Hillel vs. History at Chanukah

December 21, 2011 by Anna Batler

On the eve of Chanukah, I remember the Maccabees who waged a war against Hellenized Jews, only to then violate both the letter and spirit of Jewish law by seizing control of both the priesthood and the monarchy, and colluding with Rome. Chanukah is often understood as the celebration of the military triumphs of Maccabee guerilla fighters who recaptured the temple and restored its operation, allowing the Menorah to be lit once again. However, the laws of lighting the Menorah echo a different cause for celebration.

There is debate between the House of Hillel and the House of Shammaion the specifics of lighting the Menorah. Both Hillel and Shammai were great Tannaim, or Rabbinic leaders from the Mishnaic Era, famous for their consistently opposing views. Hillel taught that, on the first day of Chanukah, one candle ought to be lit and then one additional candle should be lit per day, until eight candles are lit on the final day. Shammai taught the opposite view. He said that on the first day, eight candles ought to be lit, decreasing by a candle a day, until the last day, when only a single candle is lit.

Shammai's opinion is grounded in the historic Chanukah. The first Chanukah, was in fact celebrated as Sukkot, to make up for the Sukkot missed during the fighting, and thus the Chanukah ritual had to reflect Sukkot observance. On Sukkot, the number of sacrifices brought at the Temple decreased each day, and so we decreased the amount of candles we light.

Hillel argued that decreasing the candles is simply too depressing—instead, we should strive to increase the light and the observance of this sacred ritual: "In sacred matters we elevate, and do not lower." One must strive to be always lighting one more candle. The law was settled according to Hillel's opinion (as is generally the case), even though his argument is based on the spiritual needs of the people and not on commemoration of that first Chanukah.

In siding with Hillel and by choosing to commemorate by not commemorating the war, the Talmudic tradition distances itself from that first holiday and the Maccabees. Rather, through teaching the Hillel and Shammai Chanukah debate, we remember that battles over ideas are best waged in the halls of study. Hillel and Shammai are the anti-Maccabees/Hellenists. Their intellectual disagreements remained intellectual. Their authority rested on the quality of their arguments, not the strength of their swords. When they were not debating, Hillel and Shammai were friends.

The real miracle and triumph of the Chanukah story is the willful forgetting of the historic Maccabees and their holy war. The primary religious observance of Chanukah focuses on peaceful holiness—lighting the Menorah, we remember the miracle of a single bottle of oil that lasted for eight days. Judaism, since the end of the Maccabees, has become a religion where disagreement is woven in the fabric of tradition, perhaps in the self-conscious effort to never again be the Maccabees.

12/21/2011 5:00:00 AM

Jewish

The Girl and the Drash

Chanukah

gender

Maccabees

Sacred Texts

Sexuality

Judaism

more at patheos

Restoring, Resurrecting, Reflecting

Sherry Antonetti

A Zen teacher writes a novel describing the Spiritual life

James Ford

Progressive Christianity Tries for a Comeback

Gene Veith

Gospel-Centered Service Develops Holiness

Michele Howe

About Anna Batler

Anna Batler is a writer and an attorney based out of Washington, D.C. She writes about faith, feminism, spirituality, and religious identity at Sotah.net. She also writes a weekly feminist Bible commentary at GatherTheJews.com.

Patheos Logo Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos