Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Latter-day Saint

Women's Voices, Women's Prayers

October 05, 2011 by Rosalynde Welch

Continued from Page 1

For all its usefulness, the distinction between doctrine and policy has its explanatory limit, and one reaches it rather quickly. For one thing, it's impossible to make an a priori judgment on whether a particular practice is a doctrine or policy; they all look the same in the present, and it's not until something changes that we apply a post hoc "policy" label. How, for instance, can we tell that the restriction on women's praying in Conference is just policy? If anything, there probably is a decent scriptural case against women's praying in public. On a philosophical level, it has been argued that Mormonism as a system of ideas effectively demolishes the series of binaries on which the doctrine/policy split is based. Time and eternity, human and divine, sacred and mundane: Joseph's restoration proved these contraries and found their most fruitful expression in radical juxtaposition. If this is so, then a heuristic that relies on rigid binary distinction, like the doctrine/policy split, probably will not provide the deepest insight into Mormon experience.

Despite these limitations, the distinction between doctrine and policy has one great virtue: it allows Latter-day Saints to extend the scope of their teachings and practices in the modern world while maintaining the vital connection to our rich history. For Mormons, history is the first draft of theology: we mine our past for insights into God's will and nature, for tools of social organization, for answers to vexing personal and institutional problems. By explaining the eddies and by-ways of our history as mere "policy," we preserve our collective trust in core "doctrine" and, crucially, we look back in love to the Saints who came before us and the institutions and practices they put in place. To poison our relationship with our past would be to irreparably impoverish Mormon experience.

So even if the doctrine/policy distinction has its limitations, it nevertheless does good work in certain LDS conversations, and I think that Cynthia's is one of those. In any case, Cynthia's suggestion to invite women to pray in General Conference seems perfectly suited to Church leaders' preferred style of forward motion since President Hinckley: it is incremental, it is more symbolic than structural, and it is humanely inclusive whenever possible. I think it's a great idea, and I would certainly welcome that invocation.

Page: 2 of 2

10/5/2011 4:00:00 AM

Mormon

Salt and Seed

gender

General Conference

History

Mormonism

more at patheos

1

Jesus and Lao Tzu: Seven Striking Parallels

Gregory T. Smith

2

Muhammad's Youngest Bride: Challenging Muhammad's Character

Todd Weller

3

How Does Ḥēn Connect Tiger Woods & Palm Sunday?

Martin Thomas Johnson

4

Historic Mysterious Rosslyn Chapel

Alice Murray

Rosalynde Welch

About Rosalynde Welch

Rosalynde Welch is an independent scholar who makes her home in St. Louis, Missouri, with her husband and four children.

Patheos Logo Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube