Two Sexual myths: Sex and Christianity, part 3

July 25, 2011 by Tim Muldoon

Continued from Page 1

The modern form of the Catharsis Hypothesis is a kind of utopianism: "ah, wouldn't it be great if people could have sex without hangups or consequences? How happy we would be! Boo for Christians who hate sex!" The roots of this fictional world are ancient, but an early modern example is that of the artist Paul Gauguin, a bored stockbroker who beat his wife and dreamed of escape from the middle-class ennui of industrial revolution France. His paintings of places that appeared exotic to Europeans suggested that utopia, and his writing (especially the "autobiographical" Noa Noa) told of a place where the sex was free and the living was easy.

It was all a fiction. Today we can see in Gauguin a violent, lustful, frustrated misanthrope whose dreamy painting and exaggerated writing served his own economic interests, even as it shaped the imagination of many, including later artists such as Picasso and Warhol. And never mind that he was a racist exoticist to boot.

The problem with utopias is precisely that they elicit strong desires which themselves become compass points which lead us on a journey to nowhere. Sex among human beings is mostly imagination and only partly biology, so the way we shape imagination will impact the way we behave sexually. The major problem with the Catharsis Hypothesis is that in paying attention to outcomes or behaviors (like those Husbands Behaving Badly), it does not pay attention to input: the factors which shape imagination. Utopian sex in, false sex out. Advertising or porn, anyone?

The theologian Walter Burghardt once described contemplation as "a long, loving look at the real." (Opens pdf) Christian spirituality is not utopian about sex: it is realistic, meditative, careful, reverent. It recognizes that people imbue sex with meaning by practicing it in the context of married love: the hard life's work of coming to see a person of the other sex as beautiful in spite of flaws. It does not ignore the biological roots of sex, but recognizes that like other areas of our lives rooted in biology (eating, sleeping, experiencing illness, etc.), sex is made human by the ways we orient it toward goods we share with others. Sure, there's temptation: why would cultures proscribe adultery if it weren't a constant temptation? But ultimately there is great hope in the circumscribing of sex, the hope that in cultivating its expressions in ways that benefit others, there is the opportunity to discover in another human being something of the holy.

Read more from Tim Muldoon's series on Sex and Christianity.

Part 1: Sex and Christianity
Part 2: The Sexual Divide
Part 4: My Kind of Feminism
Part 5: Why Are Catholics Obsessed With Sex?

Page: 2 of 2

7/25/2011 4:00:00 AM

Catholic

Culture at the Crossroads

Sex

Christianity

Roman Catholicism

more at patheos

Why Your Employees Feel Gen AI Fears & How to Win Them Over

Gleb Tsipursky

Christian Nationalism: Political Tool And Biased Reporting

Al Baker

Prayer Strengthens Your Marriage Daily

David Ewen

That was the river, this is the sea

Fred Clark

About Tim Muldoon

Tim Muldoon holds a Ph.D. in Catholic systematic theology and is an award-winning author and Catholic theologian of the new evangelization.

Patheos Logo Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos