The Nihilism of "Falling Skies"

July 17, 2011 by J. E. Dyer

Continued from Page 1

This passivity is of a piece with the third dimension in which Falling Skies misses an important facet of the human character: that is, its appreciation, when in crisis, for leadership, discipline, and order. In the story, the only dynamic in which this aspect of human nature appears is the tension between Mason and Weaver. We are invited to sympathize with Mason, the bookish hero bringing historical insight to Captain Weaver's militarily conventional approach.

But the existence of command authority is at once taken for granted and vaguely resented in the narrative, as if there is nothing to explore here beyond the annoyance it sometimes presents to Tom Mason. This is an oddly adolescent perspective for a story premise as ambitious as that of Falling Skies. Certainly it's unrealistic.

In an hour-long weekly drama, screenwriters can't address everything. But what has been left out of Falling Skies leaves it feeling thin, unfamiliar, and insignificant. It makes an interesting—even a poignant—study in what the producers considered unimportant in telling the tale of an existential crisis for humanity. The story has revolved so far around Tom Mason's effort to rescue his son from enslavement by the aliens, but the narrative's case for why we should care is not so much formulaic as non-existent. The characters who band together in the Massachusetts resistance are uncompelling; they seem to have no meaningful aspirations beyond killing "skitters," foraging, and eating.

This minimalist cycle of existence isn't a subtly revealed "truth" about the human condition; it is anti-truth. It's profoundly revealing that a series like Falling Skies, presented by some of the premier names in the entertainment industry, has chosen to tell its story on this essentially nihilist basis. The cultural divide this implies between entertainment executives and average Americans seems remarkably wide.

Millions and millions of Americans do believe, without embarrassment, that human life has transcendent meaning, and that God is a real presence and refuge in times of trouble. They regard a particular, empowering form of political organization as important to the success of human endeavors. In crisis conditions, they would be more likely, not less, to mull and hone these ideas. They appreciate effective leadership because they care unashamedly about the future.

Yet in the philosophical void implied by the narrative of Falling Skies, no one would care if the giant spiders won. It is as if America's most creative minds have written themselves into a corner from which the rules of their philosophy offer no way out.

Page: 2 of 2

7/17/2011 4:00:00 AM

Evangelical

The Optimistic Christian

Falling Skies

politics

Christianity

Evangelicalism

more at patheos

Palm Sunday Counters the Violence of Christian Nationalism

Leah D. Schade

Building a Little Ark in a Frightening World

Kelley Rouland

Pay Attention to Your Impressisons

Frank Viola

What Is Christian Zionism and Why Is It So Complex?

Richard Ostling

About J. E. Dyer

J.E. Dyer is a retired Naval intelligence officer and evangelical Christian. She retired in 2004 and blogs from the Inland Empire of southern California. She writes for Commentary's CONTENTIONS blog, Hot Air's Green Room, and her own blog, The Optimistic Conservative. Follow her on Facebook and Twitter.

Patheos Logo Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos