Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Additional resources

What Would Jesus Cut?

March 10, 2011 by Greg Garrett

Continued from Page 1

Most of the arguments, such as they are, are invective, and political invective at that.

For his part, when Mark Tooley argued in The American Spectator last week that the What Would Jesus Cut? movement is wrong, he too simply attacked the people behind it or reminded his readers of their own common passions for national defense and hatred for "the huge entitlement welfare state [that] is the Religious Left's primary cherished temple."

Again, Tooley, who is a Christian intellectual, offers no engagement with the theology informing Wallis, McLaren, et. al., only a conservative species of ad hominem attacks (Brian McLaren is a liberal; Jim Wallis is a pacifist) and straw man arguments. This Christian on the so-called "religious left" has one "temple": my love of God. I have no desire for an entitlement state; what I seek is justice, because God tells us to pursue it.

I support government programs that might draw us closer to that goal. If I thought church bake sales or operating a soup kitchen out of my kitchen window were the best remedies, I'd support them instead.

When Speaker of the House John Boehner spoke on the budget February 27 in front of the National Religious Broadcasters, he used the word "moral" over a dozen times and spoke passionately about America's children, so I thought maybe here at last we'd find some pertinent theology. Boehner didn't mention education cuts, substandard medical care, or any other pressing issue facing American children except for one: the national deficit.

We are now at risk of losing a much more potent source of capital. That is the moral capital we gain from having a society that honors freedom and opportunity, and protects these values for our children and grandchildren.

Consider that a child born on this night will immediately inherit a $45,000 share of our national debt. By the time that newborn is getting ready to visit colleges, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and the interest on our debt will consume all government revenues.

Here we must speak the truth. Yes, this level of debt is unsustainable. It is also immoral.

Yes, this debt is a mortal threat to our country. It is also a moral threat.

It is immoral to bind our children to as leeching and destructive a force as debt. It is immoral to rob our children's future and make them beholden to China.

No society is worthy that treats its children so shabbily.

"A good man leaves an inheritance for his children's children," Proverbs reminds us. For too long, Washington has been ignoring this time-honored principle.

Can we tease a theological argument out of all this talk of morality? Can we hear the voice of Jesus speaking somewhere in these moral concerns about the budget?

A good man leaves an inheritance for his children's children.

No. With all respect to Proverbs (which is just that, a collection of wisdom sayings that may or may not apply to all of us in a given situation), the narrative of the entire Bible informs us that a good man is a just man who makes it possible for all children to survive and thrive.

We gain moral capital from having a society that honors freedom and opportunity.

No. Amos, Jeremiah, and Jesus tell us that we gain moral capital from doing what is right. A society where people have the opportunity to get rich can (and often does) dishonor God (see Jeremiah 7, among many other passages). As we've discussed for the past month, freedom and opportunity, wonderful as they are, are largely secular goods, and thus secondary to compassion and responsibility. Making freedom, acquisition, and security our highest goods diminishes our ability to respond faithfully to the needs of the world. The freedom to make and keep money is not Jesus-y.

So what about the big argument? Do we derive moral capital from balancing our budget and rescuing our children from debt?

Forgive me if I disagree with the Speaker of the House and our friends having Tea Parties: the deficit is not the most important moral issue being discussed in Washington and the state capitals. Nobel Prize Laureate Paul Krugman has been saying for some time that the deficit is less important than using public funding to provide jobs and help our citizens take care of themselves and their families so that we can fully emerge from the recession. Mr. Krugman says that he and many other economists are not worried, and that this deficit fetish is an issue turned into a partisan political ultimatum. Until there's a consensus among economists, I'm not going to worry about the deficit.

Now, those that do worry about children generations from now show a praiseworthy inclination toward compassion. But to allow children today to wallow in poverty, die of preventable diseases, and suffer substandard educations seems, somehow, less praiseworthy.

What would Jesus cut?

I think I know. But what do you think?

I pray for our leaders and legislators, I pray that we might have the wisdom to discern God's will in all things, and I ask God's blessings on all of us until we meet again.

Page: 2 of 2

3/10/2011 5:00:00 AM

Mainline Protestant

Faithful Citizenship

Budget

Economics

Ethics

Mainline Protestantism

politics

Christianity

more at patheos

Leisure Doesn't Make Us Happy

Gene Veith

To Love Like Christ: Working For Mercy And Justice For All

Henry Karlson

A note on some (rather atypical) recent reading

Dan Peterson

'Spider-Man Brand New Day' Review: A Lonely Hero’s Hope

DeWayne Hamby

About Greg Garrett

Greg Garrett is (according to BBC Radio) one of America's leading voices on religion and culture. He is the author or co-author of over twenty books of fiction, theology, cultural criticism, and spiritual autobiography. His most recent books are The Prodigal, written with the legendary Brennan Manning, Entertaining Judgment: The Afterlife in Popular Imagination, and My Church Is Not Dying: Episcopalians in the 21st Century. A contributor to Patheos since 2010, Greg also writes for the Huffington Post, Salon.com, OnFaith, The Tablet, Reform, and other web and print publications in the US and UK.

Patheos Logo Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos