Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Evangelical

Tripping on Libya

March 23, 2011 by David Sessions

Continued from Page 1

In an even further upheaval of the status quo, many in the upper echelons of political commentary have admitted that the arguments against their own position are compelling. One blogger put it frankly: "There are so many good reasons on both sides, so many different possible outcomes, that my only sure conclusion is that I'm glad I don't have to make a decision."

That's exactly right. Even the most studied expert cannot know how much force will be required for Gaddafi to cave, whether Arab sentiment will turn against us, and how many civilians and coalition troops will end up dead before the job is finished. If things go well, we'll have done an incredibly powerful and benevolent deed; if not, we may end up prolonging the current bloodshed or killing even more innocent people. On this side of the action, who's to say?

Such is the persistent, thankless dilemma of policymaking and the harsh reality of life itself. Rarely do preconceived categories fit, rarely are future events foreseeable, rarely do paths of action come without the possibility of tragic unintended consequences. Most of America's foreign policy disasters have come when leaders have forgotten the painful limits of intervention. Often, we do not realize whether our choices will have been for good or for ill until we have made them—and sometimes not even then.

With the lessons of Iraq and Afghanistan still hanging over us, I lean toward skepticism about taking on a third military engagement in a Muslim nation, particularly one that has so little influence on its neighbors and so little impact on our national security. The divided coalition, the weak Arab support, and the disorganized rebels are all ominous signs that this mission may be more ill-advised than it first appeared. But it's reassuring to have a president who is slow to intervene, even if he eventually does, and to see the country's commentariat so openly unsure of its own positions. To be deeply torn is a place that, in both politics and life, most of us find ourselves more often than we like to admit. Maybe if enough of us admit it this time, we will be empowered to weigh the options more productively.

Page: 2 of 2

3/23/2011 4:00:00 AM

Evangelical

Sessions on American Culture

Libya

Media

Military

Christianity

Evangelicalism

more at patheos

1

4 Gospel Stories That Seem Unfair — and What They Teach

Dennis McIntyre

2

Fremde, etranger, stranger

Fred Clark

3

America at 250: Independence Was Actually July 2

Olapeju Simoyan

4

10 Things I Wish Older Christians Told Me

Frank Viola

David Sessions

About David Sessions

David Sessions is the founding editor of Patrol. His writing has appeared in Slate, New York, Politics Daily, and others. Follow him on Twitter.

Patheos Logo Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube