Those Three Little Words: "I Don't Know"

February 16, 2011 by Jonathan Fitzgerald

Continued from Page 1

At times in this process we come to an impasse. We reach a point where we either cannot uncover the meaning of seemingly disparate texts, or we cannot find agreement among a variety of interpretations. One need not go far from here—click around this site, or follow the links out to related blogs and publications that play host to theological discussions—and there are considerations that give way to debates before devolving into arguments where the underlying understanding is that the other side isn't seeing what seems so plainly there. These are often perfect opportunities to choose silence, and to admit, "I don't know."

And yet, this response is rarely received well. In 2006, Brian McLaren, writing on the leadership blog on Christianity Today's website, came to his "I don't know" moment about the church's response to "the Homosexual Question." He reached a conclusion that I echoed earlier this month. McLaren writes, "Perhaps we need a five-year moratorium on making pronouncements. In the meantime, we'll practice prayerful Christian dialogue, listening respectfully, disagreeing agreeably."

His suggestion that we cease making pronouncements was met with criticism due, mostly, to it being misunderstood. In one response, Denny Burk, from Boyce College, introduced the quote I posted above this way, "He calls, therefore, upon evangelicals to stop talking about the issue." But of course, neither McLaren nor I call for us to stop talking, but to stop pronouncing. Responding by saying "I don't know" doesn't mean we stop considering a topic, but stop acting as if we know the right answer.

See, a response like Burk's, which is representative of many similar responses to McLaren's suggestion, falters on two false assumptions. The first is that no pronouncement means no consideration, and the second is that the answer to the question is plain and the other side is just not seeing it. But, of course, this is not the case. The answer is hardly ever plain, and certainly "the Homosexual Question" has proven to be a prime example of this. Another recent example was the question over the proper Christian response to events in Egypt. In my last column here and over at Patrol, I found myself pointing out responses that did not seem appropriate. When a commenter asked me what I thought the Christian response should be, I had to admit that I just didn't know.

That God chose to reveal so much about himself in written word instead of the myriad other ways he could have done so should be enough reason for us to, like my students wrestling with Joan Didion, sit in uncomfortable silence for a while before finally raise our hands and simply admitting, "I don't know."

Page: 2 of 2

2/16/2011 5:00:00 AM

Evangelical

In Progress

Culture

literature

Sacred Texts

Sexuality

Christianity

Evangelicalism

more at patheos

Defense of 50 NT Passages Against “Faith Alone”, Pt. 5

Dave Armstrong

Ambiguity without Ambivalence in Faith

Roger E. Olson

Comments from two near-death experiencers

Dan Peterson

There Is No Scientific Consensus in Physics

Gene Veith

About Jonathan Fitzgerald

Jonathan D. Fitzgerald is the managing editor of Patrolmag.com, and writes on the various manifestations of Christianity in culture. Follow him on Twitter or at his website, www.jonathandfitzgerald.com.

Patheos Logo Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos