Earth Day, 2012

April 21, 2012 by Gus diZerega

As Earth Day 2012 arrives it is good for we Pagans to think deeply about it's plight, both as a day, and the planet for which it is named. Along with cultural feminism, environmentalism was the greatest gift bequeathed to the country from the 60s and 70s, and Earth Day is its greatest symbolic expression. As Pagans I think we should treasure both.

Yet since that day was named America's powerful have become ever more ignorant, or perhaps simply more honest. Today the most powerful figures in our land, political, economic, and spiritual alike ignore that we are inextricably intertwined with our planet and the life that animates it. Decades after Rachel Carson demonstrated to all intellectually honest people who took the time to look that our personal boundaries were only partial, and that what we did to our environment would rebound back on us, Democrats and Republicans alike pretend her words never existed. Why?

Part of the reason is the nihilistic corruption that is so deeply entwined with corporate culture. It may yet destroy us. Americans as a people have long loved nature, and one of the corporatists greatest sins against Americans, and there are so many, is their having spent millions to convince many Americans that loving the environment is somehow anti-progress and anti-human. It is the opposite.

I have quoted Aldo Leopold's observation that what most distinguishes human beings from every other form of life is our capacity to care for other beings of no utility to us, and with whom we have no personal attachment. But there is another cause as well. Whether it is Leopold's passenger pigeon or many of us today who care about preserving the North Slope of Alaska even though we know we will never see it, our sentiments are uniquely human, unlike those of anti-environmentalists, particularly economists, who see everything, often even other people, in terms of their utility.

But there is another level to explore here. Why have so many Americans been somewhat receptive to these claims?

I think our monotheistic heritage deprives us of many insights we could rely on to come to a wiser perspective.

Even so-called secularists have incorporated transcendental monotheistic assumptions about the world into the core of their beliefs. At root most secularists believe with their monotheistic brethren that we are somehow so unique in the world that we are not truly a part of it. For example, the debate over "nature vs nurture' concerning human character accepts that nurture is not a part of nature. Nature is harsh fate, nurture is a human choice, and the distinction between them is sharp. Happily this simplemindedness is eroding, unhappily it has not eroded very much.

There is a complementary assumption. Morality must come from outside the world, either from some Creator Deity or from Abstract Reason. The world itself is amoral, whether because it is 'fallen' or because nature is "red in tooth and claw," a battle of "survival of the fittest" manipulated by "selfish genes."

Both attitudes have their roots not in observation or science, but in pre-scientific assumptions rooted in flawed theologies.

Biologists are now discovering that every dimension of who we are reflects our having arisen on this world, and done so in a long evolutionary process. Our world is reflected in our hands, our binocular vision, our skeleton, and everywhere else. The proper term for our coming into existence, as well as every other being's having done so, is "co-evolution," beginning in the earliest millennia of life's existence, when the oxygen we breath was formed by living beings. In a very real sense our world is life's creation even as we are our world's creation.

As for morality, now that they are looking biologists are finding what we would call animal moralityin many animals. Neuroscientists are discovering mirror neurons in not only human brains but animal ones as well. Empathy is hard wired into us, and people without it, no matter how high they rise in corporate America or politics, are scientifically speaking, deeply defective human beings. Darwin has been shown to have been right: morality is an evolutionary expression of life on earth. Now E. O. Wilson, who once helped popularize the "selfish gene" idea has realized it is unable to describe a great deal of what exists in life, including ourselves. His new book, The Social Conquest of Earth, turns away from Richard Dawkins, back to Darwin.

Article Continued On Next Page

Page: 1 of 2

12/2/2022 9:09:57 PM

Pagan

Pointedly Pagan

Ecology

Earth Day

Paganism

more at patheos

How to Live Simply and Give Generously

Randy Alcorn

The Gospel of Matthew: Midnight Epiphanies

Gabriel Blanchard

Top of the Country 4

Coyle Neal

Jesus & Lao Tzu: Understanding God as Tao

Gregory T. Smith

About Gus diZerega

Gus diZerega is a Gardnerian Elder with over 25 years practice, including six years close study with a Brazilian shaman. He has been active in interfaith work off and on for most of those 25 years as well. He has conducted workshops and given presentations on healing, shamanism, ecology and politics at Pagan gatherings in the United States and Canada. Follow Gus on Facebook. Gus blogs at Pointedly Pagan

Patheos Logo Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos