Some More On Progressive Evangelicals

Last updated on: August 16, 2018 at 2:21 pm by Zach Hoag

Some More On Progressive Evangelicals 2018-08-16T14:21:32-05:00 Zach Hoag

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday I shared Doug Pagitt’s list about progressive evangelicals at Onfaith. My comments may have been interpreted as critique, but that’s actually not how I intended them.

The fact is, perhaps for the first time ever, I find myself making peace with the idea of being a “progressive evangelical.” I’ve resisted it in the past because of the politicization of the word “progressive” – which, by the way, Doug does a perfect job of expressing in his piece. “Progressive” can be an uncomfortable label because:

We are seeking a progressive posture to help us engage in all the work of God in the world, not only along one set of binary political choices.

But what I felt was missing in that list, at least to my eyes, was a substantial definition of “evangelical.” In other words, I am a progressive evangelical precisely because I am not just a progressive, or even a progressive Christian more broadly. The evangelical part means something to me, and I think it needs to mean something if this category is going to have any significance or staying power.

To be honest, I think there is something incredibly powerful about combining the emphases of progressive thought with evangelical conviction. In that sense, as I’ve written before, evangelical conveys a commitment in both belief and practice to a biblical and historical Christian gospel. Instead of deifying doubt, evangelicalism clings to the hope of that belief – and welcomes the doubts that come as that which strengthen true belief. Evangelicalism does not, as my friend Karina Kreminski says, put forward a “hermeneutic of doubt.”

This is why I was asking about whether there is room for orthodoxy in Doug’s list. Orthodoxy – or put more generally, historic Christian conviction – is at the core of evangelicalism, and I didn’t see that element in Pagitt’s outline. That said, my favorite point was point 10, and maybe this is Pagitt’s way of expressing the core conviction of evangelicalism that holds even in the progressive form:

10. We still love Jesus

Really. Most of us find Jesus more compelling, more commanding, more converging than ever before. We believe Jesus and in the good news of the reign, commonwealth, or ecosystem of God, and we seek God’s will to be done on earth as it is in heaven by focusing on love — love for God and neighbor, for outsider and enemy.

Any thoughts on these clarifications or on being a progressive evangelical in general? I’d love to hear them!

progressive evangelical

Previous Post

November 11, 2015

Josh Feuerstein (Starbucks Red Cup Watchdog) Appears on CNN and It's Hilarious

Next Post

November 12, 2015 Goldilocks Theology and God’s Power - Thomas Oord

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2018 August 2018 July 2018 July 2017 May 2017 January 2017 November 2016 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 March 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz