Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Semi-Official Blog of Zack Hunt

Home
Progressive Christian
An Open Challenge To Ken Ham

An Open Challenge To Ken Ham

Last updated on: April 8, 2016 at 10:04 am by Zack Hunt

An Open Challenge To Ken Ham 2016-04-08T10:04:37-06:00 Zack Hunt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

ark encounter2 (Credit: Ark Encounter, Facebook)

I can’t remember the last time I wrote anything about Ken Ham.

I remember live tweeting his “debate” with Bill Nye, but other than that I can’t think of the last time I gave much thought to Ken Ham and his fundamentalist wonderland in Kentucky.

That said, I do remember the last time Ken Ham wrote something about me.

A few years ago, I wrote an anti-inerrancy post entitled “The Bible Isn’t Perfect And It Says So Itself.” It created enough of a stir that it managed to gain the attention of Ken and his cohorts at Answers In Genesis who felt it their Christian duty to warn their readers not to be duped by my heretical rantings.

But I don’t hold a grudge. I really don’t. Mostly because I don’t take Ken Ham’s theological (or scientific) opinions seriously enough to care if thinks I’m a heretic leading people straight to hell.

Sadly, there are far too many people who do care what Ken Ham thinks and believe him to be an authority on both faith and science even though he as exactly zero credentials to back up his “expertise.”

Like most charlatans, Ham’s lack of actual expertise hasn’t stopped him from successfully peddling his wares to the masses, most notably in the form of The Creation Museum. Unfortunately, one affront to science and good taste wasn’t enough for Ken. For the past few years, he has been working at The Ark Encounter, a biblically accurate, life-size replica of Noah’s Ark that will serve as giant wooden middle finger to all of Ken’s critics who thought it couldn’t be built.

Despite the numerous challenges that go along with any endeavor of this size (like whether or not to issue junk bonds), Ken Ham has soldiered on and is preparing to welcome the public onto his ark this summer.

But before that happens, I have a challenge for Ken.

Ham’s entire theology is founded on a literal interpretation of Genesis. Without a literal interpretation of the creation account, the Flood, etc., he argues, all other theology crumbles. This, of course, is absurdly untrue, but that’s what Ken believes and that’s, in part, why Ken has built this life-size replica of Noah’s Ark. He believes it’s history come to life. Physical proof, so to speak, that the biblical story literally happened as described in Genesis.

So, I say prove it, Ken.

Obviously, Ken can’t recreate a worldwide flood…thankfully because honestly, I kinda think he would try if he could just to prove his point. But Ken does have the ability to prove whether or not Noah could have actually fit 2 (or 7 depending on which chapter you’re reading) of every kind of animal on earth on the ark.

Now, Ken claims to have already done a bunch of fancy math proving there was more than enough space for all of the animals, their food supply, and Noah’s family. It should be noted, however, that this math is based on a rather self-serving interpretation of the text that reads “kind” of animals as the taxonomic category of “family” instead of “species,” while conspicuously ignoring the fact that the first command in the text is an unqualified “all living creatures,” not just “kind.” By hiding behind “kind” instead of “species,” Ham & Co. can claim there was a radically smaller amount of animals on the ark than one would typically assume.

What that exact number is, however, isn’t clear as Ham’s Answers in Genesis site put it at somewhere around 16,000 animals, while the Ark Encounter site conveniently claims the number was more like 7,000. Ham doesn’t include aquatic creatures, isn’t particularly clear about insects, and dismisses the dinosaur problem (because they were still alive according to Ham) by making all the ark dinosaurs, baby dinosaurs. Which is, admittedly, a rather creative solution.

Ham claims to have done the fancy math and maybe he has, but math is for scientists and as Ken Ham has proven time and time again, science is an evil tool of Satan meant to deceive the world and lead all of its inhabitants straight to hell.

So, before the Ark Encounter is fully completed and filled up with all the various pseudo-historical exhibits Ken plans to fill it with, I think he should take advantage of this once in a lifetime opportunity and prove once and for all that the Noah’s ark really could have fit 2 of every “kind” of animal on earth (and, of course, 7 pairs of every clean animal).

I realize this would be a costly affair and there are only so many junk bonds you can issue, so I’ll cut Ken a break and let him fill up the ark with cardboard cut-outs instead of the real thing, so long as he leaves enough room to account for the space their real life, three dimensional counterparts would take up.

Lest you think this is one giant sarcastic post, let me be clear: I’m being completely serious.

For years now, Ken Ham has denounced as heretics anyone and everyone that doesn’t subscribe to his brand of fundamentalism. He now has the chance to definitively prove that he’s right and the rest of us are wrong.

I, for one, want to see him do it.

Come up with a non-Answers In Genesis supplied, i.e. actually authoritative, total number of taxonomic animal families in the world, mock up their stand-ins (don’t forget the insects!), and fill the Ark Encounter with them, making sure to leave the space their real world counterparts would need to move around as well as the space needed for their food supply and living compartments for Noah and his family.

If all of that fits in the ark, then I will publicly apologize to Ken Ham for doubting him and his literal interpretation of the Flood story.

If it doesn’t, then Ken should apologize to everyone he’s branded a heretic and immediately cease his crusade to deceive the Church into believing our options are fundamentalism or hell.

Obviously, I won’t be holding my breath waiting for that apology, but if Ken really does believe what he preaches, he’ll take this unique opportunity to silence the doubters once and for all.

The fact that he hasn’t already planned a stunt like this is enough to make one wonder if somewhere deep down even Ken Ham knows Ken Ham is nothing more than the P.T. Barnum of Christian fundamentalism.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 6, 2016

Religious Freedom Is Nothing More Than A Euphemism For Legalized Discrimination

Next Post

April 19, 2016 12 Marks Of Progressive Evangelical Christianity - By Morgan Guyton

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Review Classifieds Commentary Fundie Friday Funny Pictures Music Video News Prophecy Technology Televangelist Throwback Thursday Tract Tuesday Tracts Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 June 2018 May 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 September 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz