Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

The Semi-Official Blog of Zack Hunt

The (Other) Obvious Reason Churches Won’t Be Forced To Marry Anyone

Last updated on: July 1, 2015 at 10:54 am   by Zack Hunt

The (Other) Obvious Reason Churches Won’t Be Forced To Marry Anyone 2015-07-01T10:54:17-06:00 Zack Hunt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Screen Shot 2015-07-01 at 10.31.37 AM(Credit: CNN, Twitter)

It’s been 5 days since the Supreme Court’s historic decision that struck down same-sex marriage bans across the country and panic levels in conservative Christian circles are still high.

On Monday, I joined the chorus of countless others trying to assuage the fears of my conservative neighbors by calling attention to the fact that in states like mine where same-sex marriage has been legal for years, churches haven’t been forced to marry anyone they didn’t want to marry and civilization itself has yet to crumble.

The chorus fell on deaf ears.

I understand that anecdotal information isn’t always that persuasive (and shouldn’t be), even when it’s riddled with things like indisputable facts and historical reality. So, in a perhaps vain hope of calming fears, I want to offer two other, admittedly obvious, reasons churches need not fear Uncle Sam showing up at their door to force them to marry folks they don’t want to.

First up, the First Amendment.

The fear-mongering rhetoric the flowed freely Friday (even from the dissenters on the Supreme Court) declared that the Court had completely ignored the Constitution, created a new law whole cloth, and would eventually ignore the First Amendment as well to start forcing churches to perform same-sex weddings.

It’s hard to know where to start with everything that’s wrong with the misinformation being spread in recent days, but this issue of ignoring the Constitution seems to be a consistent theme, so let’s start there.

No, the majority of the Supreme Court did not ignore the Constitution. In fact, their opinion was based explicitly and specifically on their interpretation of the Constitution, in particular the 14th Amendment. Obviously, not everyone agrees with their interpretation (thus the reason it’s called an opinion), but it’s nonsensical to claim they ignored the Constitution to create a new law when the complete opposite is true: they interpreted the Constitution to strike down laws that were unconstitutional.

Also, unconstitutional: telling people how to practice their faith.

The First Amendment has and continues to do a pretty stellar job of protecting churches, synagogues, mosques, temples, etc. from the government stepping in and telling them how to practice their faith. No Supreme Court decision that I can’t think of – including this one – has made any headway in the government’s supposed effort to infringe upon those freedoms.

It’s true the Supreme Court redefined marriage, but they redefined marriage for the State, not the Church. Unfortunately, since the days of the Moral Majority (though probably even further back), American Christianity has been deeply wedded to the State. So much so that it often forgets where one begins and the other ends. And so we’ve reached a point where it’s assumed that what is true for one, must be true for the other and vice versa.

Nothing could be further from the truth, both for the United States and for the Christian faith. In the United States, the Constitution separates church from state. In Christianity, Jesus is Lord, not Caesar.

But regardless of how we got here, it’s this ideological quagmire that sparks irrational panic that overlooks a simple, but important fact: the Supreme Court ruled on the actions of the state, not the theology of the Church. States issues marriage licenses. Churches perform marriage ceremonies. Neither actually needs the other, which is why the Court’s ruling on laws affecting state issued marriage licenses has no affect whatsoever on the marriage ceremonies performed by churches or any other religious institution.

Under the protection of the First Amendment, churches can continue to refuse to marry same-sex couples or anyone else they don’t want to marry because they’re not in the business of issuing marriage licenses, the state is. It’s no different than a church refusing to baptize someone or allow someone to participate in the Eucharist. Why a church would ever do either is beyond me, but like marriage, these things are rites of the Church, they’re part of practicing the faith which is protected by the First Amendment. Which means Churches can continue deciding who participates in the life of the Church and who doesn’t just like they always have.

Which leads us to the other obvious reason churches won’t be forced to marry anyone.

People generally don’t ask people who don’t like them to be involved in their wedding.

You see, there’s a certain arrogance in the panic of certain churches over the Supreme Court decision, namely the assumption that same-sex couples will inherently want to be married by theses simply by virtue of who they are. It’s kind of ridiculous when you think about it. If same-sex folks aren’t showing up at these churches already (because they’re clearly not welcome), it’s highly unlikely they’re going to suddenly appear out of thin air and demand that a pastor who neither knows them nor “approves of their lifestyle” will conduct a ceremony of such profound personal significance in their lives.

Weddings just don’t work that way, at least not usually.

When I got married, my wife and I were very intentional about who we asked to perform the ceremony. We asked two people to officiate together: our pastor at the time and my wife’s grandfather (who was/is a minister). Both men had/have played important roles in our lives and meant/mean a lot to us. It made perfect sense for to ask them to oversee such an important moment in our lives.

Likewise, when I had the honor of officiating a wedding just a few months ago, the bride asked me and everyone else in the ceremony to be involved in the wedding because of how much we all meant to her and vice versa. She was our Sunday School teacher growing up and as such it was an amazing and humbling opportunity to give back to someone who had given us so much.

That’s how weddings tend to work. The people getting married (regardless of gender) invite people they love and care about to be involved and if it’s a religious ceremony, they tend to ask pastors they love and care about who also love and care about them to conduct the ceremony.

A couple might hire an officiant they don’t know if they’re not particularly religious, but even in that case, couples don’t tend to seek out people who don’t like them, who treat them like second class citizens undeserving of equal rights, who damn them to hell for not loving the right people to perform their wedding.

It just doesn’t happen.

I know, I know. Even though you “disagree with their lifestyle” (Please stop staying that, by the way. It makes no sense.) you love them anyway. I’m sure you do, but denying them equal opportunities at church (to say nothing of equal rights), freaking out on Facebook about the downfall of civilization after the SCOTUS decision last Friday, and damning the LGBT community to hell because of who they are kinda, sorta sends a different message. Which means whatever sincerity there is in those claims of love gets lost in a whirlwind of rhetoric and actions that sends a very different message, one that makes most LGBT couples decidedly less interested in having your church officiate their wedding.

In other words, legal arguments aside, churches worried about being forced to marry same-sex couples need not fear.

They’ve already done a great job of making it crystal clear LGBT couples aren’t welcome at their church to begin with.

And people usually don’t like to get married where they’re not welcome.

 

[READ THIS BEFORE YOU LEAVE A COMMENT: “But I heard about this person being sued for refusing to perform a wedding!!” I’m sure you did. 3 things: 1)Anybody can try to sue anybody for anything in this country. That doesn’t mean the plaintiff will win or that the lawsuit will even be heard by the court and not tossed out immediately…2)For-profit officiants are not the same thing as pastors. The former is open to discrimination lawsuits because they are conducting business, not practicing their faith. If you can’t see the difference between the two, I can’t help you…3)If it happened in another country, it’s irrelevant to the discussion here for a litany of reasons.]

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



June 29, 2015

A Word Of Warning To My Fellow Christians About Same-Sex Marriage

Next Post



July 7, 2015 This Guy Found Jesus At A Walmart


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Review Classifieds Commentary Fundie Friday Funny Pictures Music Video News Prophecy Technology Televangelist Throwback Thursday Tract Tuesday Tracts Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 June 2018 May 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 September 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who opposed the rebuilding of the Temple and tried to discourage the Jews?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Philistines Amalekites Moabites Their enemies/Samaritans

Related posts from The Semi-Official Blog of Zack Hunt

Progressive Christian

The End Is Nigh! Get Your Rapture Survival...

The Semi-Official Blog of Zack Hunt

Progressive Christian

Is It Really Well With My Soul?

The Semi-Official Blog of Zack Hunt

Progressive Christian

Daddy, Is Your Friend Going To Come Back...

The Semi-Official Blog of Zack Hunt

Progressive Christian

I Want To Speak At Your Event And...

The Semi-Official Blog of Zack Hunt

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube