Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

youngfogey

The Sort-Of Christian Revival

Last updated on: May 20, 2024 at 10:04 am   by Esther O’Reilly

0 Comments

The Sort-Of Christian Revival 2024-05-20T10:04:23-04:00 Esther O’Reilly

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

L to R: Alex O’Connor, Justin Brierley, Liz Oldfield, Freddie Sayers

I enjoyed this new three-way conversation from Unherd with Justin Brierley, Liz Oldfield, and Alex O’Connor, moderated by the always capable Freddie Sayers. Justin is a friend who will be known to many of you for his work with Unbelievable?, Alex O’Connor is a young atheist with a growing Internet platform, and Liz Oldfield is a Christian communicator/coach/consultant with lots of thoughts on how to reach post-Christian “nones.” Broadly, everyone was discussing whether or not there’s a “Christian revival” percolating in a UK context, and if so, what it means. Justin thinks there is, and not just because a handful of public intellectuals are making positive noises about Christianity. Alex and Liz sort of agree and sort of don’t.

The conversation took a lot of interesting turns. Alex and Liz had a number of lively “moments” that have sparked some conversation, while Justin held down the calm, quiet center. There’s plenty to write about, but for this post, I’ll just drill down on one point Alex made a couple different times, which, in my opinion, didn’t quite receive the answer it needed. Alex has always objected to “the Tom Holland thesis,” as put forward in Holland’s book Dominion, which is that “everything is Christian,” more or less. All the nice things in our culture flow downstream of Christianity, and even things that appear to be at odds with each other share Christian roots. So, for example, people who oppose gay marriage can point to Paul, but people who advocate for gay marriage can point to nice-sounding ideas about human rights. But where did the idea of human rights come from? Uh-oh.

But Alex isn’t impressed. He’s said so before on Ben Shapiro’s show, and he reiterated the same objections for the Unherd audience last week. He doesn’t want to thank Christians for all the nice things, because he doesn’t think he needs to. He thinks secularists came up with the nice things all by themselves, and now Christians are just trying to steal the credit. You can watch the end of Glen Scrivener’s response video here, where Glen genially calls Alex’s rant a load of “tosh.” Glen offers some historical rebuttal of the notion that, for instance, “enlightened secular rationalists” were the ones who really ended slavery. Really?

I think that’s all good and needed, but Glen chose not to pick up a different strand of Alex’s rant that also merits a reply. Fundamentally, Alex is a leftist, with strong leftist views on feminism, gay marriage, and so forth. He looks at these “waves,” then looks at passages in the Bible that clearly rule out female priests, or clearly rule out homosexual romance, and says, “One of these things is not like the other.” Of course, various churches have “evolved” here, including the Church of England, which no doubt Alex approves, but he would say they “evolved” by venturing beyond the biblical text and doing mix and match with secular humanism.

That was a rather uncomfortable thing for Alex to say in this conversation. I admire his forthrightness. However, I noticed that his conversation partners chose mostly to let this point pass. I think there were a few reasons for this. One reason is that all three of them would (I’m guessing) be more or less on the same page anyway with regard to feminism. Justin’s wife is even ordained in the CofE. This of course, is a festering debate in Anglican Church of North America. A few months ago, I wrote about how Calvin Robinson came over the pond and got deplatformed at an Anglican conference in Charleston for saying the awkward bit out loud here. It might be a non-issue for the British, but in the American Anglican context, the issue isn’t going away, and it may well lead to more schism down the road.

The issue of gay affirmation—for both clergy and laity—is even touchier. The CofE has spent years, nay decades, “officially” dawdling on the issue. But functionally, the progressives took over the show long ago. I would guess that Justin leans more conservative on this issue. But based on this 2019 podcast Liz Oldfield did with lesbian “priest” Sally Hitchiner (who’s currently in a civil partnership), Liz doesn’t seem too bothered about it. I mean, here’s the episode description:

Rev Sally Hitchener is an Anglican priest and Associate Vicar of St–Martin–in–the–Fields, Trafalgar Square. She was previously co–ordinating Anglican Chaplain and inter–faith advisor at Brunel University, and is the founder of Diverse Church, a charity which supports LGBT+ Christians.

In this episode she discusses her sacred value of gift, her experiences as a gay female priest, and why sometimes being an outsider can be a blessing.

Now, maybe Liz would say that she personally has some “different convictions” than Sally on gay marriage, etc. But the point is that she clearly regards Sally as a Christian co-laborer, and she appears to be quite unconcerned about the state of Sally’s soul, or the souls of the various people Sally is guiding. As far as Liz is concerned, Sally should keep up the good work. If they disagree, their disagreement appears secondary, perhaps somewhere on the level of the credo versus pedobaptism debate. At one point in the Unherd dialogue, Oldfield refers to the “massive values gap” on sexuality that causes many “nones” to hang back from taking the leap. But there are any number of churches that would be happy to baptize them where they are, no leap required.

To be fair to Oldfield, I also saw her positively bumping this rather salty take by Theos think tank head Nick Spencer on the attempt to cancel Scottish politician Kate Forbes. Spencer mocks the people who are hounding Forbes for believing “ooh…wrong, archaic, bad things” about marriage. (Even though truthfully, Forbes isn’t much of a firebrand, and there’s probably no concrete sense in which she would get in the way of anyone on the progressive left. It’s all theater.) I’ve also seen Oldfield land on the side of Christians who would prefer not to bake gay wedding cakes, to give her some more credit. My guess is that she occupies roughly the same territory here as someone like the American Anglican writer Tish Harrison Warren: trying hard to be nice and warm to everyone on all sides of the debate, but expressing dismay when the progressive left makes it clear they don’t really believe in nice, warm things like free speech or religious liberty.

This might make Oldfield a charming dialogue partner, but it doesn’t make her a particularly strong or helpful guide when trying to answer a hard-edged question like O’Connor’s. You can sense her ambivalence when she earnestly agrees with him that yes, indeed, Christians have “squabbled and wrestled and discerned” over all this knotty stuff for a very long time. “Alex is completely right. There are many strands to this tradition,” she says, “There are Christianities, right?”

Well…wrong, actually. There’s Christianity, and then there’s heresy. Tom Holland’s thesis may hold in a loose sense, and it might be useful in what it adds to the taxonomy of heresy, so to speak. But as I’ve written before, at the end of the day all he’s really done is reinvent the mainline church wheel for a secular audience. Although, to be fair to Tom, he’s a bit complicated himself in his ideas about church. I sometimes get the sense that he would like a church which is very robust on the creeds, on all the “weird” supernatural bits, on miracles, and so on, but has a tolerant liberal view of anthropology. But of course, a church that’s “progressive” on the latter is going to “progress” on all sorts of things. Conversely, a church that takes Tom’s general advice to “stay weird” on the latter is more likely to “stay weird” on the former. I wonder why?

This is the can that won’t be kicked down the road, or nudged off the road, in serious conversations around “Christian revival.” Because as long as it’s allowed to remain a bump under the rug, so to speak, we can’t really talk about what Christian revival would really mean in a full-throated, holistic way. We can only talk about a “sort-of Christian revival.”

That’s not to say that I think every single thing that could be said about all this must be said in every single context. There’s a time and a place for everything. However, I’m inclined to think that when an honest atheist very bluntly asks, “Isn’t one of these things not like the other?” he deserves an equally blunt reply.

 

Religious Events

Faith and Culture

Previous Post



May 15, 2024

How John MacArthur Gets Mental Illness Wrong

Next Post



June 16, 2024 5 Father's Day Movies

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Really appreciated this. Your take is essentially where I stand on the issue, although I ..."

orual


How Should Christians Think About Homosexuality ..."

"Kingsnorth advertises husband ignorance with every arricle. Does he honestly believe Christ cares nothing for ..."

Roger McKinney


Paul Kingsnorth’s Erasmus Lecture, Revisited

"The reformed chjurch is Sardis. There is no new life and miracle in the "bloody" ..."

Herrnhut


How John MacArthur Gets Mental Illness ..."

"Veterans are an exception. Not all medical advice is accurate. I was diagnosed with Generalized ..."

Rose


How John MacArthur Gets Mental Illness ..."


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 3 star 3.5 star 4 star 4.5 star Anatomy of a Song Behind the Songs Blog Stuff Book Reviews CCM CCM vs. SG CD Reviews Christians in Entertainment Christmas Essential 12 Christmas Favorites Christmas Top Fives Concert Reviews Concerts Culture Devotional Thoughts Faith and Culture From the Vault Fun Gospel Singers Gospel Songs Great Music Guest Posts Harmony Master Classes History Holidays Humor Hymns Interviews Marriage in the Movies Monday Morning Humor Movie Reviews Movies Music NQC Odds and Ends Old Movies, New Eyes Old Southern Gospel News Old Stuff Open Threads Other Genres Perfect Tenor Performances Polls Questions and Answers Recently Added SG vs. The Rest of the World Sing It Again Songs Songwriting Southern Gospel Surprise Sunday The Definitive Hymns Theology Toe-to-Toe Top 10 Lists Top 5 Top 5 Lists Two Sisters Review Uncategorized Video Posts Youtube Finds

Select a Month August 2026 February 2025 August 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 October 2023 March 2023 February 2023 December 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 June 2020 March 2020 February 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 April 2018 September 2017 August 2017 May 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the high priest when Jesus was crucified?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Gamaliel Caiaphas Annas Nicodemus

Related posts from Young Fogey

Family

Should You Turn Your Testimony Into Content?

Young Fogey

Family

Paul Kingsnorth's Erasmus Lecture, Revisited

Young Fogey

Family

The Conservative Case for Sauron

Young Fogey

Family

How John MacArthur Gets Mental Illness Wrong

Young Fogey

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

How to Make a Decision When You Can't...

Main point: It’s much more valuable to stay close to God so...

Archdiocese Hosts Military Marriage Retreat in Germany

RASTATT, Germany — The transient military lifestyle, with its frequent deployments and...

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a...

Walking through History

  A new article, written by Jeff Lindsay and Gale L. Pooley,...

Swimfan: Forgotten Aughts Pleasures

This is a recovery effort. In 2002, My Big Fat Greek Wedding...

view all Evangelical blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube