Bostock Tells Christian Conservatives What We Already Knew

Last updated on: June 16, 2020 at 12:38 pm by Esther O’Reilly

Bostock Tells Christian Conservatives What We Already Knew 2020-06-16T12:38:14-04:00 Esther O’Reilly

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This week’s 6-3 SCOTUS ruling to make sexual minorities a protected class has come as a shock to many American conservatives. With a majority opinion penned by Neil Gorsuch, the ruling is a blatant legal retcon that would have Justice Scalia rolling over in his grave. As a piece of bench legislation, it will have damaging ramifications not only for Christians, but for anyone under pressure to accept the full suite of increasingly unhinged demands in the LGBT+ agenda. It’s already been pointed out that this is a death knell for women’s sports, as “trans women” now have legal cover to infiltrate and dominate. Such legislation also brings with it the treacherously fluid concept of a “hostile work environment,” which can be weaponized to curtail not only the free expression of an employer, but the speech of other employees who might have conscience reservations about (say) using preferred pronouns.

For conservatives who agonized over and eventually cast a Trump vote based largely or solely on hopes for SCOTUS, this is a bitter pill to swallow. Memes mocking the line “but Gorsuch” are thick on the ground right now, and rightly so. One faint silver lining is that Kavanaugh voted with the minority. Having been fairly cynical about Kavanaugh myself, I gladly admit that I was pleasantly surprised by this, and I hope to be pleasantly surprised again in the future. However, as a general philosophy of SCOTUS judges, I feel vindicated in keeping my expectations low. While others are reeling in shock, I give a weary sigh and say “I tried to tell you so.”

However, it might surprise some that I don’t pin the blame for this on President Trump. Trump was never my champion and never will be, but as far as I can see, he did make a good-faith effort to appoint originalist judges. To the extent that he was able to seek advice and make inquiries, it seems to me that Trump did about as well as he could. The truth is that the President is limited in how deeply he can inquire about a prospective SCOTUS appointee. Trump did no worse than Ronald Reagan, or either of the Bushes. Conservatives sometimes forget that while it was Reagan who gave us Scalia, it was also Reagan who gave us O’Connor and Kennedy.

Here, someone could fairly point out that we would have been guaranteed bad justices under a Democrat president. I don’t contest this point. Nobody denies that things could be even worse. But Bostock should be a wake-up call that at best, a Republican vote is a dice roll. I deeply sympathize with my Christian conservative friends who have held out hope for a turning of the tide. I would like to submit, respectfully, that it is a false hope, and always has been.

This is a painful admission. Hope dies hard. Dreams die hard. The pro-life movement has to some extent been animated by such hope and such dreams. To admit that there is a sense in which the Christian conservative’s cause has been a lost cause for decades is difficult to say out loud without simply being crushed. “What is the goal then?” one could fairly ask. “What are we trying to fight for?”

I have no easy answers for this, except to say don’t put your trust in princes, or presidents, or SCOTUS judges. Don’t sell your vote for a mess of pottage. If you pin your hopes on the political process, you are going to be disappointed—bruisingly and repeatedly. So don’t.

At the same time, this is not a call to blanket cynicism. There is still much to be hopeful and thankful for in this country. There are still gardens to tend, children to raise, and small victories to be won, if you look for them. And there is the assurance that whether or not we are “winning,” we’re standing for something that’s true. As Alexandra DeSanctis writes at National Review, echoing Ryan Anderson, now is the time to remind ourselves that Christian conservatism has never been about pleading for exemptions to exercise religious bigotry in the public square. It’s about a vision for the best good of the nation, the family, and the human individual. We may be on the losing side. But we are still on the right side. To quote Gandalf, that is an encouraging thought.

Faith and Culture

homosexuality

politics

Previous Post

March 13, 2020

As Schools Close, Stay-At-Home Parents Should Count Their Blessings

Next Post

June 20, 2020 Christians Must Resist Woke Gaslighting

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 3 star 3.5 star 4 star 4.5 star Anatomy of a Song Behind the Songs Blog Stuff Book Reviews CCM CCM vs. SG CD Reviews Christians in Entertainment Christmas Essential 12 Christmas Favorites Christmas Top Fives Concert Reviews Concerts Culture Devotional Thoughts Faith and Culture From the Vault Fun Gospel Singers Gospel Songs Great Music Guest Posts Harmony Master Classes History Holidays Humor Hymns Interviews Marriage in the Movies Monday Morning Humor Movie Reviews Movies Music NQC Odds and Ends Old Movies, New Eyes Old Southern Gospel News Old Stuff Open Threads Other Genres Perfect Tenor Performances Polls Questions and Answers Recently Added SG vs. The Rest of the World Sing It Again Songs Songwriting Southern Gospel Surprise Sunday The Definitive Hymns Theology Toe-to-Toe Top 10 Lists Top 5 Top 5 Lists Two Sisters Review Uncategorized Video Posts Youtube Finds

Select a Month August 2026 February 2025 August 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 October 2023 March 2023 February 2023 December 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 June 2020 March 2020 February 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 April 2018 September 2017 August 2017 May 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which tribe first accepted David as king after Saul's death?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Benjamin Judah Ephraim Dan