Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
A Lament for Armistice Day, 2018

A Lament for Armistice Day, 2018

Last updated on: November 11, 2018 at 12:51 am by Esther O’Reilly

A Lament for Armistice Day, 2018 2018-11-10T00:38:17-05:00 Esther O’Reilly

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

iStock/Getty Images

Today marks the 100th Anniversary of Armistice Day: November 11th, 1918. Perhaps it’s just me, but I haven’t seen a surplus of retrospective pieces about World War I this year, despite its being the centennial of the war’s end. Maybe this is because we here in America have never remembered the first Great War like Britain and Europe remembered it. We contributed, certainly. We had a brush with the war. But we crossed the ocean to meet the war. The war could not come to us, to steal, kill and destroy. It did not shatter us. It did not lay us waste.

The British death toll alone was 995,939, and 1.6 million more wounded. For some perspective, the total population of the UK as of the 1911 census was 42,082,000. The bloodiest battle, the Battle of the Somme, was fought from July to November 1916. It claimed 418,000 of Britain’s war dead. Battalion after battalion was wiped out, each battalion often containing the young men of a whole town together. So the flower of a generation fell in its prime, cut down like wheat before the reaper’s scythe. “The glory of England,” says the Master to the new college in Chariots of Fire, “And they died for England.”

Behind a table of students, in the film, the camera pans across the memorial of names: the war list. “Name after name which I cannot read, and which those of us who are older than you cannot hear without emotion. Names which will be only names to you, the new college, but which to us summon up face after face.” “Now,” the Master continues to the young men before him, too young by a whisker, “Now, through tragic necessity, their dreams have become yours.”

Perhaps no piece of literature better captures this tragedy than R. C. Sheriff’s play Journey’s End, which follows a single battalion over several days as they brace for the devastating onslaught they know is coming. The play hits an inflection point when the high command hands down the order to raid the enemy camp in broad daylight and capture a prisoner for questioning. It’s a ghastly and foolish order, delivered by higher-ups to whom the men in the trenches are little more than cannon fodder. In one scene, we count down the minutes until the raid begins with the two officers chosen to undertake it. One is a young lieutenant who has never seen combat. The other, much older but still not an old man, is a gentle soul who serves as a father figure to the battalion. Raleigh, the young lieutenant, cannot focus. With minutes to go before they must go up and lead the men out, his adrenaline is pumping, his mind racing with questions.

What are the Boche doing over there now, he wonders?

“I don’t know,” answers Osborne, the older officer, the one the men call “Uncle.” Is Raleigh’s coffee sweet enough, he asks? Does he like coffee better than tea?

Yes, Raleigh answers. Then back to the questions: Will the smoke bombs work as a cover? Do they “make much row when they burst?”

Not much, says Osborne. Another gentle try: “Personally, I like cocoa for breakfast.”

Raleigh laughs: “I’m sorry!”

Osborne: “Why sorry? Why shouldn’t I have cocoa for breakfast?”

It’s just so hard, Raleigh says. It’s so hard not to talk about… Will they retaliate afterwards? “Bound to.” “Will there be shelling?”

I like how Saul Dibb’s recent film adaptation of the play stages this next part, as Osborne puts both hands on Raleigh’s shoulders and sits him down, sitting down with him. He begins to quote Alice in Wonderland: “The time has come, the walrus said, to talk of many things. Of ships and shoes and sealing-wax, and cabbages and kings…”

Raleigh lights up: “And why the sea is boiling-hot! And whether pigs have wings!”

“Now we’re off! Quick, let’s talk about pigs. Black pigs or white pigs?”

Raleigh prefers black. It’s the kind you’d find in the New Forest around his home, Allum Green, just outside Lyndhurst. Osborne says he knows Lyndhurst well. He likes it more than any place he knows. He used to take long walks around it. “I wish we’d known each other then!” laments Raleigh. With his brother, they could have shown Osborne such things, taken him such places. They could have followed the Highland Stream that runs straight through it, running with it for miles and miles. They could have led him to the places in the forest nobody knew about: thick, dark, cool places where you could stir up strange little creatures. They could have gone hunting together for the legendary ruins he and his brother never found. “You must come and help look one day,” he insists. Osborne assures him, “I’ll find them all right!”

Before they leave, Raleigh notices that Osborne has left his ring on the table and picks it up. “Just don’t want the risk of losing it,” says Osborne lightly. “Oh,” says Raleigh, slowly putting it back down.

Osborne does not survive the raid. In the film version, he is last seen firing his pistol to cover for Raleigh while dragging a wounded man behind him. Raleigh survives until the end of the play, when he is taken out with a bullet to the spine.

“Have you news of my boy Jack?” writes Rudyard Kipling, in his poem about a sailor which is not about a sailor, but about his son, his only son. Comes the answer: “Not this tide.” “When d’you think that he’ll come back?” “Not with this wind blowing, and this tide.”

In the heart of Edinburgh’s Old Town, under the shadow of a great hotel, flanked by tenements east and south, you may stumble upon the church of Old St. Paul’s. Alongside the chancel, you may trace the Calvary Stairs, winding up and up. Above the stairs, you may find a chapel. There, carved into the stone walls of that chapel in bronze, Roman letters, you may find another war list, and run down it.

For the building of that chapel, you may thank a man called Albert Ernest Laurie, for whom the 149 names on the wall were not only names. The faces they summoned up were the faces of the boys from that parish whom he had lost as a chaplain in the War, following them, yet unable to save them. You might have found him there, of a sleepless night, climbing Calvary’s way to light a flame and fill the chapel with a sweet fragrance.

The former Bishop of Edinburgh, Richard Holloway, paints this picture for us in Leaving Alexandria. He leads us up the stairs with Albert Ernest Laurie. He writes so vividly that we can close our eyes and see the candlelight flickering on the stone walls, smell the incense filling our nostrils. He watches Laurie from the shadows. He watches, and he wonders: Why is the priest’s heart so heavy? Why is he so bowed down with grief? Has he not heard of the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come?

Does he not remember? Does he not believe?

Perhaps he does, and does not. Perhaps he believes and does not believe. So Holloway suggests, in prose as lovely as it is cruel:

If he really believed in the resurrection of the dead, why mourn them so? Why build these stairs to tread the Calvary of the trenches again every day? Why build this chapel with its flags and lamps, yet in such a way that it became a place of sorrow rather than a trumpet blast of pride like so many other war memorials? Why make sure their names are all written down here, on this wall, if you know they are already written down in the Book of Life…? It is because he was not, could not be sure of these confident claims, and was hurt, like Dante, by the knowledge that death had undone so many, and continues, inexorably, to undo them.

…Laurie was a man of faith, but he also had to be a man of doubt to build those stairs and that chapel. Faith supreme and unconquerable would not grieve at all that dying, because it would know that dying was the gateway to more abundant life. Who could grieve over those whose dwelling was now in the heavenly Jerusalem, where all tears had been wiped away and sorrow and sighing were no more? Laurie hoped for that, but could not know it, might even have doubted it, which is why he had their names all written down.

I found this passage difficult to read when I first encountered it. I found it difficult to fathom how a man who had worn the collar of a priest and a bishop, closet apostate though he was, could fail so utterly to grasp what it means to grieve as a Christian. It seems that for the former Bishop of Edinburgh, the only alternative to not grieving at all is to grieve as those who have no hope—or little hope. Of course Albert Ernest Laurie is a man of doubt, in his mind. Self-appointed apostles of doubt must always drag figures of present and past down into doubt with them. It is their way.

We might ask the former Bishop what he makes of Christ outside Lazarus’s tomb. We might ask him how he reads the tears that started to the Master’s eyes when Mary told him “Rabbi, if you had been here, my brother would not have died.” Martha comes in anger, but Mary comes in sorrow. It is for Mary that Jesus wept.

Did Jesus not know what he himself was about to do? Had he forgotten? Had it slipped his mind?

No, he had not forgotten. And neither have we. We set the past and the future before us. We hold them together in our minds and in our hearts. We walk slowly through the New Forest of Allum Green, straining in vain for youthful voices that will never again split that air, for youthful feet that will never again crunch those leaves underfoot.

It is good to think on these things. It is good to weep, as Jesus wept. It is good to look behind us, even as we look ahead, through the glass, darkly, where we can just make out the New New Forest: that blessed plot, that earth, that realm where no good thing is destroyed, and all manner of thing is well.

History

Theology

World War I

Previous Post

November 2, 2018

5 Rules for Christian Voters On Election Day

Next Post

November 15, 2018 The Gods We Make Will Fail Us

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 3 star 3.5 star 4 star 4.5 star Anatomy of a Song Behind the Songs Blog Stuff Book Reviews CCM CCM vs. SG CD Reviews Christians in Entertainment Christmas Essential 12 Christmas Favorites Christmas Top Fives Concert Reviews Concerts Culture Devotional Thoughts Faith and Culture From the Vault Fun Gospel Singers Gospel Songs Great Music Guest Posts Harmony Master Classes History Holidays Humor Hymns Interviews Marriage in the Movies Monday Morning Humor Movie Reviews Movies Music NQC Odds and Ends Old Movies, New Eyes Old Southern Gospel News Old Stuff Open Threads Other Genres Perfect Tenor Performances Polls Questions and Answers Recently Added SG vs. The Rest of the World Sing It Again Songs Songwriting Southern Gospel Surprise Sunday The Definitive Hymns Theology Toe-to-Toe Top 10 Lists Top 5 Top 5 Lists Two Sisters Review Uncategorized Video Posts Youtube Finds

Select a Month August 2026 February 2025 August 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 October 2023 March 2023 February 2023 December 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 June 2020 March 2020 February 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 April 2018 September 2017 August 2017 May 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Ruth was from Moab and chose to stay with her mother-in-law Naomi.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE