Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Book Review: Letters to an American Christian

Book Review: Letters to an American Christian

Last updated on: July 28, 2018 at 2:06 pm by Esther O’Reilly

Book Review: Letters to an American Christian 2018-07-28T14:06:17-04:00 Esther O’Reilly

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Bruce Ashford of Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary enters the thick of the cultural conversation on religion and politics with this fresh collection of essays, structured as letters to a hypothetical Gen Z Christian. Spanning the gamut of hot-button issues, Ashford breathes new life into a brand of conservatism that has fallen out of fashion in post-Trump America.

Let me start with a bit of personal history: I am the child of Reagan conservatives. Our house was a library filled with books by Antonin Scalia, Thomas Sowell, Milton Friedman, and many more conservative thinkers. My earliest memories are bound up with dinner-table discussions of religion, politics and public policy. (As a very young child, I took particular relish in observing and creating object lessons in free market capitalism.) By day, I was being home-schooled. By night, I was reading. Particular works stand out in memory as watershed moments in my civic education. There’s the day I first pulled Witness off the shelf at age eleven, the book that made me feel what communism was beyond mere knowing. There’s the high school year I studied Sowell’s Vision of the Anointed and learned one of the fundamental principles of public policy—indeed, of life: There are no solutions. There are only trade-offs and compromises.

World events stick in the mind as well, but not necessarily all the same ones that stick in everyone else’s mind. It’s not every millennial for whom the memory of Terry Schiavo’s slow murder by dehydration is as fresh as the memory of 9/11. Suffice it to say, my parents paid attention. They paid attention to things that mattered. And they taught me to pay attention too.

All this to say, the past couple of years have been weird for me to watch. To put it mildly. The rule books are gone. Categories that used to be sharply delineated are blurring and switching before my eyes. People I once counted on to deliver reliable news seem to have been invaded by body-snatchers. People of my parents’ generation have been seized with confusion and naivete while their young people—my peers—try to offer loving correction. (My own parents are as savvy as ever, happily.)

I didn’t vote in the last presidential election. I don’t plan to vote in the next. To some people, this signals that I have washed my hands of my country’s future. I don’t vote, therefore I must not care. I must be a detached observer. But I can assure them this is far from the case. As a nation, we have forgotten that there is far more to politics than the presidency. Consequently, there is still much to care about. To paraphrase Charles Krauthammer, I care about politics not because it is the thing of greatest interest to me, but because as politics goes, so goes everything else with it.

But how to walk this tightrope? How to be politically homeless, yet political? How to be a Christian in America, but not of it?

Letters to an American Christian doesn’t do a perfect job of explaining how. But it’s a welcome reminder that if you’re feeling politically homeless right now, you’re not alone.

Ashford’s imaginary correspondent is a relatively new Christian with a budding career in political journalism. We get the impression that he starts off as something of a smart-alecky Young Turk, but a Young Turk with his heart in the right place. Ashford imagines how a typical Gen Z-er might push back on conservative arguments in areas like immigration and gun control, then articulates the classical conservative rebuttals in systematic form. For people who didn’t grow up learning conservative principles alongside their ABC’s, this will be a handy reference aid.

Particularly gratifying is Ashford’s robust and repeated defense of constitutional originalism. My Scalia-loving heart was warmed as he emphasized that judicial overreaches like Roe and Obergefell were not merely moral abominations, but legal abominations. Conservatives should not be shy about hammering home this point, even as we also vigorously make the moral case for life and the preservation of marriage.

Fiscal conservatism gets some space to shine as well, including an I, Pencil-like explanation of how price reflects market value. Ashford seeks to reclaim the “compassionate conservative” moniker, encouraging Christians to be unapologetic in affirming that the rising tide of capitalism will lift all boats while privately seeking what struggling seamen they may save in the meantime. It has been suggested in recent days that we need the yin and yang of reasonable right and reasonable left in our political discourse, so that the dispossessed classes are assured of a representative voice. Ashford shrewdly challenges the assumption that the left represent the dispossessed in principle, though public perception may be a different story.

In one of the weaker sections of the book, Ashford also touches on environmental politics. Granted, he acknowledges that aggressively “green” policies can have anti-human ripple effects (and that however America fusses and navel-gazes over its greenness, continents like Asia are unlikely to do anything of the sort). But he still automatically accepts that the various rituals of the environmentalists’ substitute religion are just “good stewardship” (reusing shopping bags, driving greener cars, recycling, etc.) He also indicates that our default position on anthropogenic global warming should be agnosticism, when in fact the evidence of skewed data and poor models is publicly available.

In the spirit of works like C. S. Lewis’s Letters to Malcom, Ashford has some fun with the format–too much fun, in some places. In addition to “Christian,” we also “meet” some of his colorful friends and relations, including the archetypal crudely right-wing “Uncle John.” To Ashford’s credit, he encourages Christian to be gracious to his elders and seek common ground instead of sweeping them into a basket of deplorables. Unfortunately, he still can’t resist some snide jabs of his own. In the (largely sensible) section on sexual politics, Ashford takes time to scold “Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve”-style rhetoric from Christian’s Uncle John, leaving his specific “demeaning” comments to the readers’ imagination but assuring us that Uncle John is “a man, it seems, in whom the milk of human kindness has curdled.” It struck this reader as an exercise in self-congratulation, and a peculiarly pointless one at that: “Oh God, I thank thee that I am not like this hypothetical Gen Z’er’s hypothetical Uncle John.” I’d quite like to meet Uncle John, myself. We’d probably like the same bands.

A running theme throughout is the call for a return to civility in our political discourse. This is certainly welcome in the age of Trump and has been modeled by writers such as David French. “If you want to be strong,” Ashford writes, “be civil. Show the strength that few possess—the power of self-control. Civility, in a phrase, is strength under control.” Ashford includes some welcome criticism of the alt-right in particular, briefly explaining the nature of the movement and its tactics. (For those who may have seen the word “cuck” floating about and wondered what in the world this term meant, Ashford gives you the sordid etymology thereof.) This is a perilous pit that we certainly should avoid at all costs.

Yet Ashford occasionally tilts too far in the other direction, as when he states that there is no place for mockery. I would ask him what the Babylon Bee is if not mockery appropriately exercised. I would also be curious to know if he thinks it “belittling” to suggest that in a reasonable country, a woman who has woken up every morning in tears since Trump’s win (true story) would be encouraged to seek psychiatric help. Like many writers, Ashford lapses into the well-worn trope of urging that we “respect” all our political opponents. Certainly, we should recognize that our political opponents are made in the image of God, and thus afford them the basic decency we would afford to any human being we should pass in the street. This, however, is not equivalent to respect. Respect is an earned quantity. To grant it indiscriminately is to devalue the currency.

In the end, however, Ashford finishes with a strong reminder that no matter how we temper our speech, to some it will always be the aroma of death. This, we cannot help. We can only keep speaking and acting properly. Far from the false hope of “making America great again,” Ashford offers the more modest but far more practical hope of making our individual corners of America better. He encourages the reader, “You might be surprised how little power you actually need to create life-giving culture. Perhaps you won’t transform the entirety of the American political system. But you can build something of cultural beauty and value.”

That’s a sentiment that may not win elections. But it just might win hearts.

Previous Post

July 16, 2018

Larry Norman, Jesus and the Devil: A Conversation With Greg Thornbury

Next Post

July 23, 2018 Sam Harris Asks Questions Jordan Peterson Can't Answer

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 3 star 3.5 star 4 star 4.5 star Anatomy of a Song Behind the Songs Blog Stuff Book Reviews CCM CCM vs. SG CD Reviews Christians in Entertainment Christmas Essential 12 Christmas Favorites Christmas Top Fives Concert Reviews Concerts Culture Devotional Thoughts Faith and Culture From the Vault Fun Gospel Singers Gospel Songs Great Music Guest Posts Harmony Master Classes History Holidays Humor Hymns Interviews Marriage in the Movies Monday Morning Humor Movie Reviews Movies Music NQC Odds and Ends Old Movies, New Eyes Old Southern Gospel News Old Stuff Open Threads Other Genres Perfect Tenor Performances Polls Questions and Answers Recently Added SG vs. The Rest of the World Sing It Again Songs Songwriting Southern Gospel Surprise Sunday The Definitive Hymns Theology Toe-to-Toe Top 10 Lists Top 5 Top 5 Lists Two Sisters Review Uncategorized Video Posts Youtube Finds

Select a Month August 2026 February 2025 August 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 October 2023 March 2023 February 2023 December 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 June 2020 March 2020 February 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 April 2018 September 2017 August 2017 May 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was known as "the disciple whom Jesus loved"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

James Thomas John Peter