Patriotism: I Do Not Think it Means What You Think it Means

Last updated on: July 5, 2013 at 6:00 am by Esther O’Reilly

Patriotism: I Do Not Think it Means What You Think it Means 2013-07-05T06:00:15-04:00 Esther O’Reilly

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve been thinking about patriotism recently, as I’m sure many of you have as well. Recently, an ostensibly conservative armchair politician and columnist named Michael Gerson really got my goat up when he wrote this smarmy piece lecturing right-wingers about “overreacting” to the recent NSA and IRS scandals. It’s not that I was surprised to see Gerson writing something smarmy. It’s that this was an especially insulting specimen of his smarminess.

On the one hand, he can’t escape the disturbing nature of what our government has been doing, even granting the “swaggering… incompetent” nature of Holder and the administration. But for some reason, he balks when people like Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin use words like (gasp!) “regime” and “police state” to describe Obama’s ideal vision for America. Now that just crosses a line:

It is one thing to oppose the policies of the administration; it is another to call for resistance against a “regime” and a “police state.” It is the difference between skepticism about government and hatred for government. And it raises the question: How is it even possible to love such an Amerika?

In other words, Gerson is hinting (and will hint more broadly later in the piece), that these right-wing opinion-makers are calling for sedition, and that this is unpatriotic. Changing “the government” to “government” is one subtle way that he manages to caricature them, as if they’re generally anti-government when of course he knows it’s the outrageous behavior of this administration that’s ringing alarm bells for them. Allowing “skepticism” about this government, Gerson wrinkles his nose at the faintest whiff of something stronger, waving around vague phrases like “call for resistance” without specifying what he even means. Armed rebellion? Marching on Washington? I doubt it.

He attempts to clarify by example in his next paragraph by bringing up Edward Snowden, the whistle-blower who defected after uncovering the scandal:

If our country is being run by a regime, then those who expose its machinations are heroes, as some on the right have called Snowden. If the U.S. government is a fallible institution doing its best to protect citizens from terrorist violence, then a libertarian loner who reveals classified material (including U.S. cyberwarfare plans) and bolts for a communist country might be viewed in a different light.

First of all, saying that Snowden revealed “classified material” as if that automatically makes him anathema is very ingenuous. The government has a habit of labeling anything “classified” that it doesn’t want to be publicized. Secondly, saying that Snowden “bolted for a communist country” as if that were significant or suspicious is frankly a low blow. It’s misleading because Hong Kong hasn’t always been considered a part of China, and it’s unsavory because we have no evidence that Snowden is in cahoots with any of our enemies anyway. He was looking for anywhere that would agree to take him in. Finally, it’s breathtakingly naive to assume, as if it were indisputable, that of course our government must always have its citizens’ best interests at heart. It may be bumbling and misguided sometimes, but its heart is in the right place… right? This is doubtful, to say the least. Gerson continues:

Some libertarians and populist conservatives are not merely attacking Obama; they are slandering U.S. intelligence services. There is no evidence, or even a serious allegation, that the NSA has made political use of data it has gathered. This is not a rogue operation. The NSA, with the permission of a court and under the supervision of Congress, built a searchable digital database. Listening in on phone calls still requires a warrant, based on probable cause.

His faith is touching, but recent developments have proven this very paragraph to be untrue (ironically, surfacing a mere two days after his article was published). The NSA has declared that they can indeed listen in on phone calls without a warrant. One order of crow for Mr. Gerson, coming up.

Gerson also makes the tedious argument that it’s just not nice or helpful to question Obama’s patriotism, since people on the left do the same thing about Bush. Not that the truth of the matter has any relevance, of course!

Finally, he ends his little tantrum with this petulant whimper:

Questioning the legitimacy of our government is the poisoning of patriotism. It is offensive for the same reasons it was offensive when elements of the left, in the 1960s and 1970s, talked of the American “regime.” Because it distorts the United States into something unrecognizable in order to advance a partisan ideology. Because this is still the “last best hope of earth,” not a police state. Because Americans have fought and died for this country, and to turn on it in this way is noxious. It is dishonest. And it is dishonorable.

Somehow, Mr. Gerson seems to have conflated love of country with devotion to its government at all times. Since when did patriotism come to be defined as never once opining that the corruptible people in charge of the government just might be corrupt? Gerson can stamp his foot and protest that Obama does NOT want to turn America into a police state until he’s blue in the face, but saying doesn’t make it so. Gerson’s own defense of the NSA has proven to be hopelessly naive. Moreover, it is no disrespect to the sacrifices of America’s military in wars past to lament the decay and corruption it is undergoing in the hands of a self-serving, mean-spirited, power-hungry administration. The people who are sounding the alarm about this corruption are, in fact, speaking out against the destruction of those good things in America for which those soldiers fought and died. It is Obama who has betrayed this country, not they. The only “dishonesty” apparent here is the self-deception of Michael Gerson and his ilk.

Faith and Culture

Previous Post

July 4, 2013

Up the Rebels, Down the British!

Next Post

July 8, 2013 Monday Morning Humor: The First Singer-Songwriter On the Moon

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 3 star 3.5 star 4 star 4.5 star Anatomy of a Song Behind the Songs Blog Stuff Book Reviews CCM CCM vs. SG CD Reviews Christians in Entertainment Christmas Essential 12 Christmas Favorites Christmas Top Fives Concert Reviews Concerts Culture Devotional Thoughts Faith and Culture From the Vault Fun Gospel Singers Gospel Songs Great Music Guest Posts Harmony Master Classes History Holidays Humor Hymns Interviews Marriage in the Movies Monday Morning Humor Movie Reviews Movies Music NQC Odds and Ends Old Movies, New Eyes Old Southern Gospel News Old Stuff Open Threads Other Genres Perfect Tenor Performances Polls Questions and Answers Recently Added SG vs. The Rest of the World Sing It Again Songs Songwriting Southern Gospel Surprise Sunday The Definitive Hymns Theology Toe-to-Toe Top 10 Lists Top 5 Top 5 Lists Two Sisters Review Uncategorized Video Posts Youtube Finds

Select a Month August 2026 February 2025 August 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 October 2023 March 2023 February 2023 December 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 June 2020 March 2020 February 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 April 2018 September 2017 August 2017 May 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does 1 John say about anyone who claims to be in the light but hates a brother or sister?

Select your answer to see how you score.

They are hypocrites They are liars They do not know God They are in darkness