Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Why I Am Catholic

Home
The Truth About S. 2578 From A Career Politician, With An Assist From Malcolm Muggeridge and James Madison

The Truth About S. 2578 From A Career Politician, With An Assist From Malcolm Muggeridge and James Madison

Last updated on: January 24, 2017 at 5:12 pm by Frank Weathers

The Truth About S. 2578 From A Career Politician, With An Assist From Malcolm Muggeridge and James Madison 2017-01-24T17:12:06-05:00 Frank Weathers

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It didn’t fail. Rebecca Hamilton, my blog neighbor, and soon to be retired Democrat pol, explains it simply, and succinctly.

The article says the S 2578 “failed” yesterday.

Wrong.

It did not “fail.” The vote was on cloture, not the bill. A vote on cloture is a vote on whether or not to stop a filibuster. In pragmatic terms, the failure of this vote allows opponents of the legislation to mount a filibuster if they so choose (everyone assumes they will so choose) which could and probably would keep the bill from coming to a vote.

Cloture requires 60 votes. Even though supporters of the bill fell short by 4 votes, they got a clear majority of the Senate to vote for cloture, which was, in essence a vote for the bill. Also, Majority Leader Reid set it up so that he could call another vote on cloture later.

The story is all over the internet that the bill “failed.” Not true.

Read her entire post.

I’ve been paying more attention to the prayers at Mass lately, and this past Sunday, as well as at Mass today, these words were prayed.

Give us the grace to reject all that is contrary to Christ.

Amen.

A popularly elected government that tries to use power to intimidate, and suppress religious liberty, is one of those contrary things. In this short clip, Malcolm Muggeridge is a bit harsh, but right on the money with the need for checks on power.

These checks were built into our Constitution, much to the chagrin of many politicians we seem to have elected recently. Recall James Madison’s thoughts in Federalist Paper #51,

It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices [checks and balances] should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.

Go read Rebecca’s post.

Previous Post

July 17, 2014

The Bishops Respond To The Fear Mongering Of The Administration Over Religious Liberty

Next Post

July 19, 2014 Praying For All Aboard Malaysia Flight 17, And Mourning Their Loss, In My Own, Feeble, Way

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog News Conversion Story Culture Learning Living Nature Prayer Uncategorized Working

Select a Month June 2016 May 2016 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was Paul's native language?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Aramaic Hebrew Greek Latin