Dodging The Bigotry Bullet, U.S. News and World Report Hosts Sister Mary Ann Walsh

Last updated on: January 24, 2017 at 5:12 pm by Frank Weathers

Dodging The Bigotry Bullet, U.S. News and World Report Hosts Sister Mary Ann Walsh 2017-01-24T17:12:59-05:00 Frank Weathers

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday, longtime US News & World Report columnist Jamie Stiehm posted an anti-Catholic screed regarding the controversy stirred up by Justice Sotomayor’s stay protecting the Little Sisters of the Poor from the dictates of the HHS Mandate.

Today, in what I reckon is a move to not show favoritism towards Ms. Stiehm’s skewed viewpoint, they have given Sister Mary Ann Walsh, Director of Media Relations at the USCCB, a forum as well. They did so as a part of their Debate Club on the argument, “Do the Little Sisters of the Poor Have a Case Against Obamacare?”

Sister Mary Ann has the floor,

When it comes to public opinion, you can’t find a worse group to pick a fight with than the Little Sisters of the Poor. They’re an order of nuns who attend to the frail and elderly. With longstanding generosity to those in need, the Little Sisters hold moral sway.

Quality of life stands as their first concern, and so the Little Sisters run low-cost, top-flight nursing homes. People trust grandma and grandpa to their care. Those who pass to their eternal reward in these homes do so in the arms of loving nuns who have become family. People have seen the work of these nuns all across the United States and around the world. There is nothing with which to pick a fight.

Yet that is what the Department of Justice did in January when it opposed Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s New Year’s Eve decision to grant the nuns a temporary reprieve from having to pay crippling fines for refusing to sign what the Justice Department has described as a meaningless government form.

But if this self-certification form is so meaningless, why is the government fighting so hard to get the Sisters to sign it? That’s because it has plenty of meaning, as Houston-based Judge Lee Rosenthal pointed out in a case to block the mandate brought by East Texas Baptist University and Houston Baptist University.

“The act of self-certification does more than simply state the organization’s religious objection,” the judge said. The form also tells a third party that “it must provide the organization’s employees coverage that gives those employees free access” to the problematic devices and products, and that “it must notify the employees of that benefit.” He concluded that “the purpose and effect of the form is to accomplish what the organization finds religiously forbidden and protests.”

That’s the gist of the nuns’ argument, and if they were picketers (which they are not), their mantra would be “Lord Divine, we can’t sign.” The Little Sisters are letting conscience be their guide.

Read the rest.

So U.S. News dodges the bigotry bullet, by being fair and balanced, see? For the rest of the debate club, aside from Sister Mary Ann, on the “YES” side, they also host Edward Mechmann of the Archdiocise of New York, and Penny Nance (president and CEO of Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee). And Opposed? Law professor Leslie Griffen of UNLV, and Dana Singiser, VP of Public Policy for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Go check it out. You can even upvote (or downvote) the participants responses to the argument.

Debate Image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Argumentation & Debate

HHS Mandate

Little Sisters of the Poor

Public Policy

SCOTUS

US News & World Report

USSCB

Previous Post

January 8, 2014

Bigotry Watch: Chuck Norris, Or U.S. News and World Report? UPDATED

Next Post

January 11, 2014 U.S. News Didn't Dodge The Bigotry Bullet; They Loaded The Weapon, And Pulled The Trigger

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog News Conversion Story Culture Learning Living Nature Prayer Uncategorized Working

Select a Month June 2016 May 2016 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How old was David when he became king over Israel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

20 years old 25 years old 40 years old 30 years old