Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Why I Am Catholic

Home
Your Blogger is on the Wrong Side of Public Opinion, Just Like G.K. Chesterton

Your Blogger is on the Wrong Side of Public Opinion, Just Like G.K. Chesterton

Last updated on: January 24, 2017 at 5:20 pm by Frank Weathers

Your Blogger is on the Wrong Side of Public Opinion, Just Like G.K. Chesterton 2017-01-24T17:20:53-05:00 Frank Weathers

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Just an F.Y.I. Good news, though. The Church is on the right side of history. She always has been, and always will be. Of course, that is because the Church is like Noah’s Ark, and therefore constructed to ensure our salvation.

Salvation history, then, is what She is all about. Saving folks from their sins is why Christ came into the world, and it’s why He said the things he said, which consequently were so unpopular that they led to his execution.

To be saved, see, is why I signed up to be a member of His ship’s company. By doing so, I knew that this would be unpopular, as being against error is what Christians must be, even when we ourselves are error-prone. And since Christ handed the Keys to St. Peter, fighting error, while throwing the lifeline to many, is what the Church is all about.

It’s what G.K. Chesterton was all about too. I’ve been reading his biography of St. Thomas Aquinas as Lenten reading, and as penitential activities go it has been too enjoyable to call it a penance. As cartographer of the mind of St. Thomas, I would argue that Chesterton cannot be equaled. His map makes the mind of the genius understandable.

The genius saint himself is entirely accessible, too, as my reading of his commentaries on scriptures, and his Lenten homilies have shown to be the case. Not sure you’re ready to dive in to Thomism? No problem. Read St. Thomas’ theological stuff instead. You can find it up yonder in the Cool Links page on the toolbar beneath the banner.

Back to the title of this post. The above was a long winded introduction to a post I saw on Crisis, written by Dale Alquist of The American Chesterton Society. The piece is about something that isn’t gay, and that isn’t marriage, though it does seem quite popular in an Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds sort of way.

The title of the piece is, if not subtle, not duplicitous either. Have a look.

G. K. Chesterton: It’s Not Gay, and It’s Not Marriage

One of the pressing issues of Chesterton’s time was “birth control.” He not only objected to the idea, he objected to the very term because it meant the opposite of what it said. It meant no birth and no control. I can only imagine he would have the same objections about “gay marriage.” The idea is wrong, but so is the name. It is not gay and it is not marriage.

Chesterton was so consistently right in his pronouncements and prophecies because he understood that anything that attacked the family was bad for society. That is why he spoke out against eugenics and contraception, against divorce and “free love” (another term he disliked because of its dishonesty), but also against wage slavery and compulsory state-sponsored education and mothers hiring other people to do what mothers were designed to do themselves. It is safe to say that Chesterton stood up against every trend and fad that plagues us today because every one of those trends and fads undermines the family. Big Government tries to replace the family’s authority, and Big Business tries to replace the family’s autonomy. There is a constant commercial and cultural pressure on father, mother, and child. They are minimized and marginalized and, yes, mocked. But as Chesterton says, “This triangle of truisms, of father, mother and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it.”

This latest attack on the family is neither the latest nor the worst. But it has a shock value to it, in spite of the process of de-sensitization that the information and entertainment industries have been putting us through the past several years. Those who have tried to speak out against the normalization of the abnormal have been met with “either slanging or silence,” as Chesterton was when he attempted to argue against the faddish philosophies that were promoted by the major newspapers in his day. In 1926, he warned, “The next great heresy will be an attack on morality, especially sexual morality.” His warning has gone unheeded, and sexual morality has decayed progressively. But let us remember that it began with birth control, which is an attempt to create sex for sex’s sake, changing the act of love into an act of selfishness. The promotion and acceptance of lifeless, barren, selfish sex has logically progressed to homosexuality.

You’ll want to read the whole piece, as it is sweeping, while being pleasantly brief. Barren sex for the sake of pleasure, Oscar Wildes’ fall (and redemption), and thoughts about “highly civilized” sins are discussed with clarity, and charity. Alquist ends his piece with words that sting us all in their prophetic truth: we Christians have made a mockery of marriage.

Marriage is between a man and a woman. That is the order. And the Catholic Church teaches that it is a sacramental order, with divine implications. The world has made a mockery of marriage that has now culminated with homosexual unions. But it was heterosexual men and women who paved the way to this decay. Divorce, which is an abnormal thing, is now treated as normal. Contraception, another abnormal thing, is now treated as normal. Abortion is still not normal, but it is legal. Making homosexual “marriage” legal will not make it normal, but it will add to the confusion of the times. And it will add to the downward spiral of our civilization. But Chesterton’s prophecy remains: We will not be able to destroy the family. We will merely destroy ourselves by disregarding the family.

This reminds me of that time I was on the wrong side of Stephen Colbert. You know, because Jesus said plenty about marriage, and other inconvenient stuff too. That is what lifesavers do.

Previous Post

February 20, 2013

Nine U.S. Senators Say Hobby Lobby Is Protected from the HHS Mandate By Law

Next Post

February 21, 2013 German Bishops: Emergency Contraception in Case of Rape is Licit if the Pill Doesn't Induce Abortion UPDATED

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog News Conversion Story Culture Learning Living Nature Prayer Uncategorized Working

Select a Month June 2016 May 2016 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How old was David when he became king over Israel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

20 years old 25 years old 40 years old 30 years old