Another New Years Eve Setback for the HHS Mandate: Sharp Industries Wins Relief

Last updated on: January 24, 2017 at 5:52 pm by Frank Weathers

Another New Years Eve Setback for the HHS Mandate: Sharp Industries Wins Relief 2017-01-24T17:52:52-05:00 Frank Weathers

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It’s time for some more bubbly. Were the courts in session yesterday, or what? Though I was on vacation, see, the answer to that question is “yes,” even if they got down to business quick, and closed down early for New Years Eve. First, we heard of Kort & Luitjohan’s good news, then an injunction handed to Tom Monaghan’s company, and now there’s another reason for a toast.

Francis J. Manion, Senior Counsel with the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) sent me a little New Year felicitation,

Late yesterday, a federal court in St. Louis granted a temporary restraining order against the HHS mandate in favor of yet another for-profit business — Sharpe Holdings, Inc., a Missouri dairy farming, creamery and cheese making company. For those keeping score at home, to date 9 for-profit companies have obtained injunctions against the mandate, 3 have been denied.

As the folks at the Becket Fund remind us, 9-3 is a pretty good record.

Here is a brief snippet from the order handed down by the court yesterday (bold highlights are mine).

Plaintiffs argue that they will suffer irreparable harm due to deprivation of First  Amendment freedoms and violations of RFRA. They have shown that they must act  immediately to implement a new employee health plan due to its January 1, 2013 renewal  date in compliance with the law. Injunctive relief will permit plaintiffs to implement a plan consistent with their religious beliefs without the threat of liabilities imposed due to failure to follow the arguably unconstitutional ACA mandate.

“The loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time,  unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.” Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976).  Violations of RFRA also can constitute irreparable harm. See Kikumura v. Hurley, 242  F.3d 950, 963 (10th Cir. 2001).

Plaintiffs further argue that any arguments that injunctive relief would harm the  government are frivolous. According to plaintiffs, the government has stayed imposition of  the ACA mandate upon thousands of employers and millions of employees, and that the  government cannot argue convincingly that injunctive relief in this case would cause it any harm. Whether or not plaintiffs’ argument in this regard is accurate, it has not been shown to be otherwise at this time. Further proceedings may contest this issue.

The court concludes that the balance of harms presented at this time tips clearly in  favor of the plaintiffs. The court is not strongly persuaded by the government’s arguments  that plaintiffs’ delay in bringing these proceedings for 16 months should work against their entitlement to short term injunctive relief. No substantial case has been shown for the government being prejudiced by this passage of time.

The court has concluded that plaintiffs are entitled to injunctive relief that  maintains the status quo until the important relevant issues have been more fully heard.

For the reasons stated above,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of plaintiffs Sharpe Holdings, Inc.,  Charles N. Sharpe, Judi Diane Schaefer, and Rita Joanne Wilson for a temporary  restraining order is sustained.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants are TEMPORARILY RESTRAINED from  enforcing the ACA Mandate regulations regarding abortifacient devices and related  counseling. See 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-13(a)(4), 26 U.S.C. § 4980D, § 4980H, and 29 U.S.C. §  1132.

Read the court order in its entirety here.

And so another small, for-profit, business has won a reprieve from the oligarchs of the Administration. Pretty quick work, for an action that was filed just a few weeks back on December 20, 2012.

Three cheers for the Separation of Powers! Huzzah! Huzzah! Huzzah!

Previous Post

January 1, 2013

Because We Could Be ONE. Maybe the Time is Right...

Next Post

January 3, 2013 Mike Huckabee on Hobby Lobby: "We will stand with them in their resistance."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog News Conversion Story Culture Learning Living Nature Prayer Uncategorized Working

Select a Month June 2016 May 2016 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Siloam mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Love Gift Received Sent