Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Why I Am Catholic

Home
Mr. Obama? Beware the Lee Shore…And the Rock UPDATED

Mr. Obama? Beware the Lee Shore…And the Rock UPDATED

Last updated on: January 24, 2017 at 5:57 pm by Frank Weathers

Mr. Obama? Beware the Lee Shore…And the Rock UPDATED 2017-01-24T17:57:44-05:00 Frank Weathers

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Do you know where political careers go to die? Upon the rock that is the Church. God Himself said that, “upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it.” So if anyone needs to blink in this game of chicken the President and his Administration are playing, it is the Administration, and not the Church.

Maybe in another country, see, one without a strong tradition of the rule of law, or one where cults of personality and the “strongman” were honored instead of “government of the people, by the people, for the people,” this would take a very long time to play out. But this isn’t another country like that; this is the United States of America. As Gerald Russello notes in his article at the National Catholic Register this morning, it is highly likely that the Founding Fathers would be supportive of the US Bishops in the fight against the HHS Mandate.

Some critics lament that the US Bishops are playing partisan politics, and therefore their stance is lamentable. Such a belief flies in the face of the Christian tradition the Church proclaims and protects, as well as the reality of the current situation. Our shepherds have not deviated from the course that the Church has plotted, because the Church is a lighthouse on the issue of religious liberty.

This isn’t top-secret information, or anything, because it is all laid out in the Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, published back in 2004. If the Administration would like to adopt policies that provide an “integral and solidary humanism” for the polis, that would be a great place for them to start coming up with ideas.

Skipping up to Chapter 8, we find exactly the thoughts that provide the foundation for the fight against the HHS Mandate. Thoughts like,

-The failure of kingship on the historical level does not lead to the disappearance of the ideal of a king who, in fidelity to Yahweh, will govern with wisdom and act in justice.

-Jesus refuses the oppressive and despotic power wielded by the rulers of the nations (cf. Mk 10:42) and rejects their pretension in having themselves called benefactors (cf. Lk 22:25), but he does not directly oppose the authorities of his time.

-Jesus, the promised Messiah, fought against and overcame the temptation of a political messianism, characterized by the subjection of the nations (cf. Mt 4:8-11; Lk 4:5-8).

– Submission, not passive but “for the sake of conscience” (Rom 13:5), to legitimate authority responds to the order established by God.

-When human authority goes beyond the limits willed by God, it makes itself a deity and demands absolute submission; it becomes the Beast of the Apocalypse, an image of the power of the imperial persecutor “drunk with the blood of the saints and the blood of the martyrs of Jesus” (Rev 17:6).

-The biblical message provides endless inspiration for Christian reflection on political power, recalling that it comes from God and is an integral part of the order that he created. This order is perceived by the human conscience and, in social life, finds its fulfilment in the truth, justice, freedom and solidarity that bring peace.

Those are just a few of the highlights from the first section of that chapter, but already a picture should be forming in your mind as to why we, as a pilgrim people, must fight the gross injustice that the President is attempting to bring down upon us, and our posterity, for the sake of his own narrow, opportunistic, agenda. For as the Bishops made clear yesterday,

This is not about access to contraception, which is ubiquitous and inexpensive. . . . This is not about the religious freedom of Catholics only, but also of those who recognize that their cherished beliefs may be next on the block. This is not about the bishops’ somehow ‘banning contraception,’ when the U.S. Supreme Court took that issue off the table two generations ago. Indeed, this is not about the Church wanting to force anybody to do anything; it is, instead, about the federal government forcing the Church . . . to act against Church teachings. This is not a matter of opposition to universal health care, which has been a concern of the Bishops’ Conference since 1919, virtually at its founding. This is not a fight we want or asked for, but one forced upon us by government on its own timing. Finally, this is not a Republican or Democratic, a conservative or liberal issue; it is an American issue.

And since it is an American issue we, and our shepherds, have every right to use every means available to us as citizens to resist this mandate. Turn back to the Compendium and you find the following information that will explain this further.

-Authority must be guided by the moral law. All of its dignity derives from its being exercised within the context of the moral order,“which in turn has God for its first source and final end”.

-Authority must recognize, respect and promote essential human and moral values.

-Authority must enact just laws, that is, laws that correspond to the dignity of the human person and to what is required by right reason.

And when it doesn’t? We have the right to object conscientiously. Which is the whole enchilada with the HHS Mandate, and several other provisions of Obamacare, that strike at the conscience protections of both the Church as an institution, and the Church as a home for the faithful.

c. The right to conscientious objection

Citizens are not obligated in conscience to follow the prescriptions of civil authorities if their precepts are contrary to the demands of the moral order, to the fundamental rights of persons or to the teachings of the Gospel. Unjust laws pose dramatic problems of conscience for morally upright people: when they are called to cooperate in morally evil acts they must refuse. Besides being a moral duty, such a refusal is also a basic human right which, precisely as such, civil law itself is obliged to recognize and protect. “Those who have recourse to conscientious objection must be protected not only from legal penalties but also from any negative effects on the legal, disciplinary, financial and professional plane”.

It is a grave duty of conscience not to cooperate, not even formally, in practices which, although permitted by civil legislation, are contrary to the Law of God. Such cooperation in fact can never be justified, not by invoking respect for the freedom of others nor by appealing to the fact that it is foreseen and required by civil law. No one can escape the moral responsibility for actions taken, and all will be judged by God himself based on this responsibility (cf. Rom 2:6; 14:12).

That was my use of the bold there. And that duty to not cooperate is why the Church, as guided by our Bishops, will not budge from this matter. It is also why we are actively resisting the mandate, see? Because we must. Again, this isn’t classified information,

c. The right to resist

Recognizing that natural law is the basis for and places limits on positive law means admitting that it is legitimate to resist authority should it violate in a serious or repeated manner the essential principles of natural law. Saint Thomas Aquinas writes that “one is obliged to obey … insofar as it is required by the order of justice”.[823] Natural law is therefore the basis of the right to resistance.

There can be many different concrete ways this right may be exercised; there are also many different ends that may be pursued. Resistance to authority is meant to attest to the validity of a different way of looking at things, whether the intent is to achieve partial change, for example, modifying certain laws, or to fight for a radical change in the situation.

And so, on this 15th of March, immortalized by William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar as the pinnacle of the ill portent, “Beware the Ides of March,” I’ll end this little post with what I call the Parable of the Prideful Sea Captain, also known as the “The Lighthouse Joke.” Here it is, brought to life courtesy of YouTube

p.s. I know that the “parable” above is a tall-tale that has been discounted, and discredited as false long ago. But the likeness between the Obama Administration (the USS Montana), and the USCCB (the lighthouse) is too good to pass up. Here’s a memo the White House will be sending soon though:

(· · · — — — · · ·)

Update: Academics on the HHS Mandate .

Social Doctrine of the Church

Truth

USCCB

Previous Post

March 14, 2012

The Bishops Decide to Fight On...

Next Post

March 15, 2012 Jon Stewart Muses About What Happens...

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog News Conversion Story Culture Learning Living Nature Prayer Uncategorized Working

Select a Month June 2016 May 2016 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "The battle is not yours, but God's"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jehoshaphat Moses Joshua David