Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Why I Am Catholic

Home
To Be Frank, Part 3, “What the Blazes, Blaise?!”

To Be Frank, Part 3, “What the Blazes, Blaise?!”

Last updated on: January 3, 2015 at 5:37 pm by Webster Bull

To Be Frank, Part 3, “What the Blazes, Blaise?!” 2015-01-03T17:37:21-05:00 Webster Bull

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’m a baseball fan. I love the game! I never really played it that well as a kid, but my oldest son is pretty good. He didn’t play ball on an official team until he was seven years old, but I started pitching Wiffle Balls to him when he was three or four.

I played softball in the Marines a bit, but my son’s ability, along with normal “dad” tendencies, led to a love affair with this game that has become a big part of my life. Our whole family bleeds Dodger Blue! And having been taught to hit the ball by a grizzled “old salt” of a Marine Master Sergeant (in Cairo, Egypt of all places), and having taught my son to switch-hit, I am of the mind that I can hit the ball pretty well.

In my previous post, I introduced you to my buddy Blaise Pascal. Blaise never got the opportunity to play baseball because, heck, it’s an American game, and he was dead long before it was developed. But he knew how to play tennis, and I believe this because he said so right there in Pensée (Thought) #22.

Let no one say that I have said nothing new; the arrangement of the subject is new. When we play tennis, we both play with the same ball, but one of us places it better.

I know that he loved sports in general because of Pensée (Thought) #141. Lookee, here ladies!

Men spend their time in following a ball or a hare; it is the pleasure even of kings.

And he said that way before radio or television came around! Did I mention I like this guy?! But wow, I was completely unprepared for the 100 mph fastballs of “thought” that Blaise could hurl when he was alive. Like this zinger from last week’s post:

How I hate these follies of not believing in the Eucharist, etc.! If the Gospel be true, if Jesus Christ be God, what difficulty is there?

What the WHAP! (ball hits the catcher mitt) WHIFF! (me swinging like a seventh-grader) was that?! Strike One.

We haven’t even talked about Pascal’s Wager, which prompts a person with no belief in God to consider the possibility that “reason alone” isn’t enough to disprove God’s existence. I’m not going to waste time on the Wager on these grounds: a) I was already a baptized Christian when I first read it, and I believe in God, so what’s to argue? and b) Blaise can throw a whole series of 100-mph thoughts so accurately that even a determined skeptic would never have a chance to get a hit. Blaise is a lot like Nolan Ryan in that regard.

If you need to check out the Wager, a full explanation of it is here .

From Thought 184 through Thought 241, you will find 57 pitches that will leave you swinging for the fences—and coming up empty every time—if you are in the God “is not” camp. In the game of baseball, throwing 57 straight strikes would be phenomenal. Maybe Blaise couldn’t throw a complete nine-inning game, but if he pitched that many strikes in a game and did it regularly, he would be a household name. And I know he would make one heck of a closer.

The next section of Pensees is entitled “Of the Means of Belief.” It starts with a thorough skewering of those who worship the god or goddess of Nature. Blaise flatly states that “seeing” all that is created is “not believing.” One doesn’t find God in every little created thing that surrounds us:

It is not after this manner that Scripture speaks, which has a better knowledge of the things that are of God. It says, on the contrary, that God is a hidden God, and that, since the corruption of nature, He has left men in a darkness from which they can only escape through Jesus Christ, without whom all communion with God is cut off. “Neither knoweth any man the Father, save the son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him.” (Matthew 11:27)

This is what Scripture points out to us, when it says in so many places that those who seek God find Him. It is not of that light, “like the noonday sun” that this is said. We do not say that those who seek the noonday sun, or water in the sea, shall find them; and hence the evidence of God must not be of this nature. So it tells us elsewhere: “Verily, thou art a God that hidest thyself.” (Isaiah 45:15)

So let me get this straight.Using knowledge of scripture, which everyone knows Catholic Christians are ignorant of, Blaise starts sawing off another leg of the stool I sat on until Easter 2008, when I became a Catholic, a stool I had been sitting on for 30+ years—the stool of my “superior” knowledge of the Bible.

Ever become friends with somebody who laid you low first? You know: They punched you in the mouth or knocked you on your keister when you crossed them with your alleged superiority—and then became your friend? Taking my swings against Blaise Pascal was a lot like that.

Semper Fidelis

Next time: Blaise shows me the way to the second most published book on the planet (after the Bible).

Conversion Story

2BFrank

Pascal

Previous Post

December 6, 2009

Because the Real Santa Story is Amazing Enough

Next Post

December 7, 2009 Because “The Test of All Happiness is Gratitude”

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog News Conversion Story Culture Learning Living Nature Prayer Uncategorized Working

Select a Month June 2016 May 2016 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Deborah's husband?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lapidoth Jephthah Gideon Barak