After Covid

Last updated on: May 3, 2021 at 12:16 pm by William Droel

After Covid 2021-05-03T12:16:18-06:00 William Droel

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Working Catholic: After Covid by Bill Droel

The parish’s live-stream Mass should continue. In fact, we should invest in a second camera and even consider some programming during the week. No, say other parish leaders. Live stream was helpful, but its continuation will discourage people from returning to the church building.

Similar questions are raised about parish meetings via Zoom; about the merits of investing more time and money in the parish website; about the viability of the parish bulletin; about pre-packaged religious education materials accessed on the internet; or about communicating with the entire parish by way of Listserv or Twitter.

Those parish leaders that want to make sound decisions might use these coming weeks to study and reflect upon the nature of media, particularly of satellite-dependent communication. Start with Marshall McLuhan (1911-1980). His books require patience because McLuhan was deeply learned “and he was determined to show off,” writes Adrian Daub in What Tech Calls Thinking (Farrar, Straus, 2020). “That means lots of allusions, weird digressions, examples that don’t seem to illustrate the thing they are supposed to illustrate.” But McLuhan, writing before the internet, has yet to be displaced as the foremost communication theorist. He coined common terms like global village and surfing. Yet most techies, I suspect, have never studied him.

Every parish has some leaders who are proficient with computers. Most parishes have a staff member who can maintain its website, program its roadside sign and help other staff members whose computer is nonresponsive. A parish’s computer-savvy types might meet (in cyberspace or in the parish office) to consider the future of parish communication (live-stream Mass, website, bulletin, etc.). 90% of the conversation, I predict, will be about content and hardware, not about the nature of media.

McLuhan’s basic insight is contained in his phrase, the medium is the message. The specific technology or the medium, he writes, actively “shapes and controls the scale and form of human association.” Daub explains: “McLuhan regarded those analysts who focused their attention on the content of books or TV shows as dupes… The medium is for those who get it. The content is for idiots, naifs, sheep.” Well, that’s strong language, but the point is crucial. Having a TV, for example, in one’s home, irrespective of the content of any show and regardless of its hours of use, changes the environment. The invention of TV changes human interaction. The same is true with a computer in the house or a mobile device in one’s pocket. Regardless of the software, regardless of the content of any website or any posting, the internet in itself changes human interaction.

Is the change for the better or worse? McLuhan compared media, one to another– radio, TV, magazine ads, other printed material and more. Yet his reflections were “free of value judgment,” writes Daub. Most people back in the day presumed that McLuhan was a champion of whatever is the latest. I knew that McLuhan was a traditional Catholic, uncomfortable with Vatican II liturgy. Thus I presumed he was warning against the latest. Yet as Daub insists, “What made McLuhan’s theory distinctive was that he didn’t bother to ask whether this was a good thing or a bad thing.”

Should live-stream Mass continue? Should more money go toward the parish website? Should worshipers be encouraged to bring mobile devices to church? Should a video screen be mounted near the altar? Should the weekly bulletin be abandoned?

Start with prior questions, McLuhan says. Despite its fans, don’t Facebook and other social media (regardless of content) actually individuate? Is a Mass that reaches the faithful by way of a satellite adding to inclusivity or by the nature of the medium does a broadcast Mass soon enough displace community? Is the Eucharist really present inside a church if a significant number of worshipers regularly participate remotely in the Mass? Does a printed bulletin carry the gospel deeper into the mind and behavior of a parishioner than the parish website? Is it efficient to eliminate all on-site parish meetings in favor of Zoom or does the discursiveness during in-person meetings add something to the parish? Is it better to do a little of everything or is it better to stake the gospel on the latest and slickest technology as much as possible?

Think about the medium. The content is quite secondary.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 9, 2021

Postmodernism

Next Post

May 14, 2021 NYC Honors Saints

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the first Judge of Israel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Samson Gideon Othniel Deborah