Urban Trends

Last updated on: April 20, 2020 at 2:03 pm by William Droel

Urban Trends 2020-04-20T14:03:36-06:00 William Droel

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the latter half of the 1960s many U.S. cities experienced race riots. Plus, the exodus to suburbs that began in the 1950s accelerated in the 1960s and into the 1970s. Plus, industry left our Atlantic coast and Great Lakes cities, moving to the South or overseas. All of this made for the first urban crisis. Demographer Richard Florida details a second one in The New Urban Crisis (Basic Books, 2017). The new crisis is inequality. It is “the concentration of talent and economic activity in fewer and fewer places,” he writes. This “not only divides the world’s cities into winners and losers, but ensures that the winner cities become unaffordable for all but the most advantaged… Inequality in cities is on the rise…and in the long run urban inequality threatens economic growth.”

Florida’s list of “superstar cities” in the U.S. includes, in order, New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, Washington and San Francisco. There are some tech hubs and second-tier cities (Austin, Seattle, Portland, greater Miami etc.) that have similar characteristics (positive and negative) to the superstars, but to less degree. It is important to note that the divide between prosperous cities and the rest goes along with a divide within a superstar area. “The superstar [quality] of cities turns on a relatively small number of superstar areas within them,” Florida says.
This brings us to gentrification. This phenomenon is routinely decried for causing displacement and directly accelerating wealth inequality. It’s true, but simply denouncing gentrification is insufficient. In fact, as Florida argues, a rigid NIMBY posture makes matters worse.
Gentrification, in today’s worrisome sense, is only about 20-years old. Prior to this century downtown areas were mostly rundown. By the late 1970s young urban pioneers—artists, musicians and others—were rehabbing warehouses and lofts around the outer ring of select cities’ downtown areas. This activity was not causing massive displacement. Today the trend is more visible and it is driven more by developers than by artists. It drives up property prices in neighborhoods. For example, Florida calculates that the price of one apartment in NYC’s SoHo could buy 38 houses in Memphis, 30 in Cleveland and 26 in Cincinnati. In the 1970s I lived for a time in NYC’s Lower East Side in a walkup flat with the bathtub in the kitchen. Today, on that same block…well, “you can’t touch this.”
The “underlying motor” of this real estate trend, Florida repeatedly emphasizes, is “the clustering force.” A winner-take-all knowledge economy grows because of educated, talented, ambitious, networked people. They thrive when they cluster. Therefore, not all places can be superstar. It will not do to build a sports stadium in a place that is currently in the doldrums. It takes more than that; namely, anchor institutions like universities and research hospitals. It takes amenities like parks, river walkways, galleries, interesting bars and breweries, museums, concert venues and more. Plus to retain talented workers, it takes shopping districts, including groceries and good schools, often private or charter.
And now to the problem of inequality: Gentrifying neighborhoods in the superstar cities are often located right next door to non-gentrifying ones, Florida says. That is, the prosperity of Chicago or Seattle applies only to sections of town. The front yard looks great; the backyard is neglected. More to the problem, developers or even urban pioneers are not interested in the land occupied by the poor. Chicago’s south side and west side is about the same as it was in 1970, except that residents of those neighborhoods are relatively worse off because Chicago prospers. It’s called concentrated poverty and it is getting worse. Concentrated urban prosperity contributes to “chronic, concentrated urban poverty…which remains the most troubling issue facing our cities.”
The talented few need increasing numbers of service workers—bar tenders, grocery clerks, transport workers, grammar school teachers, janitors, women and men in the trades, clerks, nurses and more. It is in the interest of the prospering to retain good quality service workers. Though the wage gap between the creative class and the service class is wide, that gap at the moment still gives service workers more discretionary income in Boston or New York than in second-tier cities like Orlando or Norfolk. The same is true, Florida shows, for working class families. But the superstars will fall sooner or later unless they close the wage gap, retain or create some manufacturing and stimulate moderate-income housing.
To be continued with some positive examples…

Droel edits INITIATIVES (PO Box 291102, Chicago, IL 60629), a newsletter about faith and work.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 3, 2020

Hard Choices

Next Post

April 28, 2020 St. Joseph

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group uses "Meeting Houses" instead of traditional churches?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Baptists Quakers Lutherans Methodists