Helping College Students Find Meaning

Last updated on: February 3, 2016 at 11:12 am by Opus: The Art of Work

Helping College Students Find Meaning 2016-02-03T11:12:21-05:00 Opus: The Art of Work

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This post begins a partnership with Opus: The Art of Work at Wheaton College. Opus Graduate Student Fellows are reading a whole host of interesting books, and you get to benefit from their hard work!

By Sarah DeKoekkoek

In Helping College Students Find Purpose, Robert Nash and Michele Murray address the reality that today’s college students, members of the quarterlife generation, ask questions of meaning and purpose, expecting their educational experiences to answer them. Meaning refers to the ability to make sense of life on an ongoing basis. Purpose suggests an ultimate aim or end.

According to Nash and Murray, these questions, especially those of meaning-making, need to be acknowledged across disciplines and departments on college campuses. They challenge faculty and administrators to contribute to students’ search for meaning. The book begins with a theoretical foundation, exploring the realities of the quarterlife generation and meaning-making. In Part II, the authors explore practical ways in which to engage in meaning-making across campus in teaching, leading, administering, and advising. Part III includes Nash and Murray’s personal narratives of their meaning-making journeys. The primary argument presents itself in the form of collaboration. When faculty and administrators work together to aid students in meaning-making practices, everyone benefits.

Nash and Murray correctly acknowledge that questions of meaning-making penetrate college campuses and are best answered through collaboration between faculty and professional staff members. They draw primarily upon research to support their claims, but they include student testimonies and personal narratives to provide a non-research argument for why meaning-making must take place on college campuses collaboratively.

That being said, the practical blueprint of meaning-making initiatives only goes so far. Meaning-making is not a one-size-fits-all activity. Individuals’ needs and campuses’ cultures must be taken into account before adapting the models that Nash and Murray present in the book. The authors recognize this fault, presenting the practical models as examples of how meaning-making might be carried out collaboratively on college campuses.

Professors and higher education administrators are the primary audience of this book. Faculty members benefit from the pedagogical strategies and logical rationales for implementing meaning-making into teaching within the classroom, lecture hall, or seminar setting. Administrators and staff members benefit from the discussions of how to meet students where they are and engage in conversations of meaning on campus and beyond.

The primary aim of this book, however, is not to segregate the work of meaning-making. Rather, the authors desire that faculty and staff work together, learning from one another, to further the development of meaning within the quarterlife generation. The book provides ways in which collaboration could occur on campuses.

Previous Post

January 29, 2016

Paying attention to caregiving

Next Post

February 8, 2016 I've Never Pretended I'm Not Religious

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Curriculum Reviews Discipleship Information Interviews Movie Reviews New Book Resource Lists Theology of Work Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: The first plague in Egypt turned the Nile River into blood.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE