Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Word of the Day

Grammar Lesson of the Day: genitive of time

Last updated on: December 29, 2013 at 4:44 pm   by Anthony Esolen

Grammar Lesson of the Day: genitive of time 2013-12-29T16:44:18-05:00 Anthony Esolen

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Grammar Lesson of the Day: Genitive of Time

 

What part of speech is the first word of the following sentence?

 

Mornings I walk over to the church for early Mass, then I have breakfast at The Gentleman Farmer.

 

Almost everybody would say, “Noun!” And you could make a case for it. You could say, “It’s short for in-the-morning, and ‘morning’ is a noun.” Well, ‘morning’ is a noun, but ‘mornings’ here isn’t. It answers the question, “When?” It modifies the verb “walk.” It is an adverb.
So what’s an adverb doing with a plural on it? Don’t take that tone of voice with me, dear reader. That ain’t a plural, that s. It’s a genitive: the case for denoting possession or characteristic. It means “of a morning,” which is also a possible opening for that sentence:

 

Of a morning I walk over to the church.

 

It means that it is characteristic of my morning, it belongs to the morning, that I walk over to the church. If I were German, I’d say it this way:

 

Morgens gehe ich zur Kirche.

 

“Well,” you say, “there it is again! There’s the plural!” Ah, but Germans don’t use the s to make plurals, unless the word has been borrowed from modern English. The s is a genitive, like our ’s.

 

Do we have other genitives of time? Sure: days, nights, evenings, afternoons, nowadays.

 

When I say that my students have never been taught English grammar, I don’t exactly mean that they’ve never been taught genitives of time. I do mean that they’ve never been taught grammar as a coherent and fascinating whole, even supposing that they don’t get around, in the early years, to such subtleties as this one. So, when they see an -s on the end of a word, they are apt to think straightaway that it is a plural noun, not because most such things are plural nouns, but because grammar for them is a set of arbitrary terms and prescriptions. A thing with an -s on it is a plural, so they suppose; so the verb “thinks” is plural, and the noun “acrobatics” is plural, and the name “Fats” is plural, and the adverbial “nights” is plural, when none of them is plural.

 

One of the slogans of the modern teacher is that we do not teach students what to think, but how to think. Whenever you hear that, dear reader, reach for your wallet and your child. The most corrupt courses in grammar schools, high schools, and colleges are those without a solid foundational what to be learned (the geography of Europe, the poetry of the Renaissance), to which the teacher must humbly submit himself. Without that what, the teacher can range at his pleasure, whereupon teaching a student how to think can grow indistinguishable from teaching him not how to think as Shakespeare or Donne thinks, but as I think.

 

But if we really wanted to help young students to sort out their thoughts and place them in order, we would instill in them a love for the order of language itself, that is, grammar. Yes, reader, a love for grammar – and what is so strange about that? I take for granted that teachers whose eyes do not light up when they find odd shortcuts in arithmetic should not be teaching arithmetic, and teachers whose hearts do not skip a beat when they learn of a new tense should not be teaching grammar. And if they do love these fine things, they should feel no shame at all in showing students that they might well love them too.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



December 28, 2013

Word of the Day: twelve

Next Post



December 30, 2013 Word of the Day: buxom


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Daily Word Uncategorized

Select a Month January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Jabez" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Lord Saves Strength Sorrow Victory

Related posts from Word of the Day

Catholic

Grammar Lesson of the Day: The Phrasal Possessive

Word of the Day

Catholic

Word of the Day: brethren

Word of the Day

Catholic

Word of the Day: methinks

Word of the Day

Catholic

Grammar Lesson of the Day: Deponent Verbs

Word of the Day

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Parable Of The Sower And The Word...

One of Christ’s most famous parables is that of the sower who...

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube