Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Wild Garden

Home
Pagan
Greece v. Galloway: An Interfaith Opportunity

Greece v. Galloway: An Interfaith Opportunity

Last updated on: May 14, 2014 at 12:31 pm by David Dashifen Kees

Greece v. Galloway: An Interfaith Opportunity 2014-05-14T12:31:40-04:00 David Dashifen Kees

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the town of Greece, NY, sectarian prayer has been opening monthly municipal meetings since 1999. Members of that town sued it because those prayers were overwhelmingly Christian. On May 5th, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decided that case determining that sectarian prayer held prior to such meetings was not prohibited by the Constitution of the United States.

Before I continue, let me be clear: I am not a lawyer, constitutional or otherwise. But I do like lemonade, and I think that SCOTUS just handed us a bunch of lemons.

This Ruling Sucks

There’s really no other way to slice it. I think it’s even pretty poorly decided if you share the majority faith considering the decision indicates that invocations in the name of Jesus are merely traditional elements meant to “solemnize the occasion.” This minimizes these invocations putting them on the same level of, for example, the Pledge of Allegiance; the cries of “Oye! Oye!” or the action of standing that precede a judge’s entrance into a courtroom; or, as James Carroll put it in the Boston Globe: “What — invoking the holy name of Jesus makes up for, say, town officials’ habit of showing up in gym clothes?”

Regardless, the ruling is likely here to stay. Hecate Demeter, who is a lawyer, offered her initial thoughts on the ruling this past weekend at Witches & Pagans. In her article, I think she brought up a number of good points, one of which is the simple fact that this decision is unlikely to be challenged legislatively. Who wants to be described as the person who sponsored “the bill against prayer?”

Thus, it seems that the only way for those of us who want to see this ruling reversed, you know — because it sucks, is going to be to play along for the moment.

The Next Step

In the article linked above, Hecate offered this conclusion: “the only logical thing I can see to do in response is for Pagans and other members of minority and disfavored religions to begin showing up, volunteering to offer the public prayers, and making a record of the times that they are turned down.”

While I agree with her, this sucks, too. I don’t want prayer before municipal meetings. In offering her dissent to the Court’s ruling, Justice Elena Kagan discussed a variety of situations in which a person’s lack of participation in the religious invocation might bias government representatives against that person. In other words, my hopes to construct a backyard shed shouldn’t rest upon my willingness to pray. In a perfect world, representatives wouldn’t use their religion or mine (or the lack of anyone’s religion) in determining the fitness of my plans for shed-construction.

But, this is far from a perfect world.

Following the SCOTUS decision, the American Humanist Association moved to quickly provide the means for interested humanists to offer their own invocations prior to town meetings. After all, the SCOTUS decision specifically indicated that a town must maintain a policy of nondiscrimination with respect to sectarian opening prayers. The goal of this online application, according to their statement, is to provide “sample secular invocations and an interactive map to find a humanist who can deliver an invocation in one’s local area.” In short: they want to do the first and second items that Hecate described and I quoted above.

I want to do the same, and more, for Pagans.

A Policy of Nondiscrimination

The syllabus in the SCOTUS decision indicates, as mentioned above, that a policy of nondiscrimination needs to be maintained by the town. Since we’re not likely to see a legislative discussion of this ruling, that leaves the judiciary. Which means we need data and, at the moment, we don’t have it. By creating a system that would allow Pagans to offer their services to their municipalities and to record, as Hecate suggests, their experiences after doing so, we might be able to show that a pattern of discrimination does exist, If so, armed with that data, we could return to the courts.

Americans United for the Separation of Church and State is doing just that. They’re calling it Operation Inclusion. The AU maintains that “towns cannot discriminate on the basis of religion; town leaders cannot lead others in prayers or integrate worship into the legislative process; and invocations cannot proselytize or denigrate other belief systems.” If we can amass data that shows these criteria are not met, we have a way forward with respect to challenging the SCOTUS ruling.

I’ve contacted the AU to see if efforts within religious communities can be linked to Operation Inclusion, but I have not yet received a response. My next step is to contact the local Massachusetts chapter of AU; I will keep you all in the loop with respect to my efforts here.

An Interfaith Opportunity

So, that was a lot of lemons. But, there is one thing from which we can all benefit as a result of this ruling. If nothing else, it creates the opportunity for increased interfaith involvement prior to town meetings. Population statistics indicate that the majority of municipal sectarian invocations will remain Christian. This is especially true since the syllabus to the SCOTUS ruling also indicates that a town need not not search beyond its borders for “non-Christian prayer givers in an effort to achieve religious balancing.”

But, for those towns which have non-Christian members, it’s not only fair to say that the town should involvethem, but that they must. I suppose an argument could be made that without an appropriate religious authority within the town borders it may be hard to do so. But, the ruling indicated the town doesn’t have to find such authorities; it didn’t say that the a religious congregation couldn’t invite their authority to town!

From this point of view, the decision is sort of a win-win. We have the chance to share our practices with others and to engage our neighbors in learning more not only about Paganism but also about other minority faiths and about the various forms of both atheism and non-theism. And, if we find a pattern of discrimination, we also have plans in place about how to deal with it.

A Holistic Response

There’s one last thing to consider: some municipalities already have policies enforcing non-sectarian prayer (though at least one of these is now in question) or policies against prayer entirely.

These municipalities should be lauded for their stance. In addition to resources for sectarian prayer to be used in areas of the country that allow for them, I propose that we also undertake a second, complementary endeavor to celebrate, promote, and thank our towns by offering resources (e.g. form letters) that we could print, personalize, and send to our local representation. This may go some distance toward helping to shore up the wall of separation between church and state that seems to have crumbled a bit in recent times.

David Dashifen Kees posts

Previous Post

May 7, 2014

How to Do Interfaith: Basics For Pagan Beginners, Part 2

Next Post

May 14, 2014 Interfaith Update

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Aline O'Brien posts Byron Ballard posts Carol Kirk posts David Dashifen Kees posts Drea Parker posts Holli Emore posts Jess Matz posts Molly Khan posts Uncategorized Xander Folmer posts

Select a Month November 2015 September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John Paul Peter James