Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Wild Fox Zen

Zen Students: Don’t Give Up Your Power

Last updated on: February 19, 2011 at 3:51 pm   by Dosho Port

Zen Students: Don’t Give Up Your Power 2011-02-19T15:51:00-06:00 Dosho Port

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yvonne Rand once told me about a conversation she had with Lama Govinda, a German-born guy who was one of the first dharma teachers of Western descent. He retired and lived out his last years at Green Gulch, I believe. It must have been in about 1983 and the Baker scandal was rocking San Francisco Zen Center. 

“The problem,” the lama told her, “is that you Americans are all too eager to give up responsibility for your circle of protection. Don’t do it, even to your teachers.” 

The old lama here seems to be embracing a teacher-student model where the student is an adult. That’s my view too. 

Students choose to enter into a relationship with a teacher, choose to undertake the practice, and then may choose to move on at some point. 

I remember checking out a therapist while Katagiri Roshi was still alive and in our first meeting he said, “Katagiri depends on you.” 

That was a shocker. 

The ideal is expressed by Dogen, “We attain the way together.” And also the following that he borrowed from the Lotus Sutra: “Only Buddha to Buddha.”

In many dharma circles, however, traditional power is still prevalent. From the perspective of traditional power, students are like children and the power of the teacher is absolute. 

Think feudalism with the teacher like the lord and the student like the serf. Or the Leave it to Beaver family of the 50’s with the teacher as the father, Ward Cleaver, and the student as Wally or even Beaver. Or the Pat Robertson world with men as the head of the household and women as perpetual subordinates.

One sign that you might be in that kind of relationship is if you find yourself going to the Zen Center, or taking a certain position, or doing a certain practice and doing so for the teacher. Beware. What other needs of the teacher (parent) might you be trying to meet?

Any wonder that we get into big trouble?

Usually, though, it’s more complex. Many systems have various kinds of power functioning and it can get really confusing and kinda icky feeling. Sometimes there is a big gap between what’s said and what’s practiced.  

I’m not suggesting that a teacher doesn’t have power. Of course, we do. And so do students, probably more than most students know most of the time. In my view, to really sit in the student seat, it is essential to feel and act as a profoundly empowered being, a sovereign. 

“Psychologically, a person who does not feel and act empowered may experience a sense of low self-esteem, learned helplessness, and external rather than internal locus of control,” says an article on empowerment and strengths (“The Languages of Empowerment and Strengths in Clinical Social Work: A Constructivist Perspective” by Greene, Lee, and Hoffpauir). 

How could a person in such a position sit Buddha to Buddha?

In my view, power is a multifaceted and complex thing. Age, experience, profession, emotional savvy, and wealth are just a few of the things that influence power in any relationship.

One hold-over from traditional power that is often infused with a community’s power structure comes up in how the possibility of sexual relationships between teachers and students are regarded. Click here for the perspective of Diane Musho Hamilton.

It seems to be the prevailing view that students cannot have a consensual sexual relationship with their teacher because the teacher has more power. Real and free consent is then not possible. 

Now there are many good reasons for teachers and students not to have sexual relationships, let me be clear about that. One of the most important being how sex changes a relationship and the dharma focus is then difficult to maintain. 

It is important for the teacher to encourage the student to maintain a circle of protection and if the student’s dharma interests are front and center in the teacher-student relationship, then a sexual relationship will almost always be ruled out.

And when it’s not precluded, then the interest of the community to be free from the turbulence created by a teacher and student entering a sexual relationship would need to be considered and would almost certainly rule out the relationship – especially these days.

Sometimes a student will develop a crush on the teacher when it is really the dharma that they’re wild about. This is an important part of a student’s process and the teacher needs to be consistently clear about being unavailable for a sexual relationship.

However, to suggest that a student lacks the ability to form consent is dangerous and part of the problem in the American Zen scene. It places the teacher in a power-over position that can make the relationship more about the teacher than the student and then, strangely, make a sexual relationship between teacher and student more likely, not less.  Further, it disrespects students, usually women students in this case, by depriving them of personal agency.

Moreover, there’s an internal contradiction in this view that is also disempowering in the cognitive dissonance it creates. If a student lacks the personal agency to enter into a sexual relationship (including freely choosing not to have a sexual relationship), then they would also lack the agency to enter into the teacher-student relationship. They would lack the agency to give money to the Zen Center, to take on a volunteer position, to attend sesshin, etc.  They would also lack the agency to move on.

A student without personal agency would be unable to take responsibility for their circle of protection. The door handle to their inner life would be outside and depend on the teacher’s good graces and all-knowing benevolence.

What a bad idea.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



February 18, 2011

The Sound Of One Hand

Next Post



February 24, 2011 Stand On Your Own Two Feet: Can a Post-Modern Approach Save Zen?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 December 2016 October 2016 June 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the younger brother of Moses?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Aaron David Joshua Solomon

Related posts from Wild Fox Zen

Buddhist

Throw Yourself Into the House of Buddha: The...

Wild Fox Zen

Buddhist

New Vine Ghost Site for Dosho's Creative Endeavors...

Wild Fox Zen

Buddhist

Gnawing Through Qiánfēng’s Three Illnesses and Two Lights

Wild Fox Zen

Buddhist

"Why, Oh Why, Is My Practice Not Progressing?"

Wild Fox Zen

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Buddhist

On Taking Refuge in the Dharma

(Here I continue the feature of sharing talks and essays by teachers...

Easy, Right? A Dharma Talk

(Continuing my intention to share talks and essays by other members of Empty...

The Subtle Art of Bowing: A Dharma Discourse

(This presentation was first offered by my dear friend Dharma Holder Tom...

Internal Family Systems Can Heal you Mentally &...

How IFS Helped Me Stop Fighting Myself Internal Family Systems (IFS) is...

The Bible No One Spoke About: A Family’s...

A mysterious family Bible, unspoken faith, and a journey from curiosity to...

How Uncertainty Can Transform Your Life in 2025

Embracing Uncertainty: A New Year’s Resolution for the Brave As 2025 approaches,...

view all Buddhist blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube