Review of Mixing Minds: The Power of Relationship in Psychoanalysis and Buddhism

Last updated on: January 15, 2011 at 3:10 pm by Dosho Port

Review of Mixing Minds: The Power of Relationship in Psychoanalysis and Buddhism 2011-01-15T15:10:00-06:00 Dosho Port

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is a new book by Pilar Jennings, a psychoanalyst who has studied Buddhism mostly in the Tibetan tradition. A friend mentioned it to me and it grabbed my attention.

The chapter that interested me most is “Asian Monastic Teachers and the Western Psyche” which is about how Asian teachers and Western students tend to misinterpret each other based on our world views. Having studied with Japanese teachers for years, I resonated with a lot of what Jennings says. For example,

“It is not uncommon for Western students to bring a pervasive psychological narrative to their Buddhist teachers, who will in turn respond through a karmic narrative…or with an emphasis on morally based choices specific to the more communal cultures from which they come.”

Like this:

Reminded me of an old Katagiri story. Someone who had been in therapy for years but was still deeply suffering with his life came to Katagiri Roshi and shared his churning psychological stew for about 30 minutes. The fellow then asked what Katagiri had to say about it.

“Well,” said Roshi, “the most important thing is that it really is no problem.”

The man later reported that he left the meeting relieved. That’s not so much an example of coming from a karmic or moral perspective, though, but more like seeing things from a different, perhaps broader perspective.

Most Zen students these days, however, like maybe 90% in the US, study with Euro-Americans. I’d say even most of the teachers had Euro teachers. But that doesn’t matter so much – the dharma is coming from a couple thousand years in so-called Asian culture (which is hardly a monolith but anyway…) so we’ve got to deal with that where ever our teacher is coming from.

One miss is how the Western psyche is about the I-me-mine ego and the Asian perspective is much more a “we-go,” as Jennings cleverly puts it. The communal “we” is more important than the individual. Much has been written and said about all that and there may be ways in which empathy and a sense of interconnectedness are more accessible from the we-go organization of self.

But maybe not. Seems to me to be more of a alternate organization than a step up. We Western’s often idealize the “we-go” and try to play that we have that organization when we don’t. So its just another false self.

Better is to see what the self is, any way one organizes that bugger, than replace it with somebody else’s way. That can be a mask on top of a mask. But that could be just me.

Jennings also tells an interesting story of Joseph Goldstein doing koan work and her last chapter, “Healing Goals in Buddhism and Psychoanalysis: Enlightenment and Integration” that I haven’t gotten around to writing about yet and this is already too long and I’ve got to go and get my son.

So I may have more blogslop on this topic later.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 10, 2011

Next Post

January 19, 2011 Happy Shobogenzo!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 December 2016 October 2016 June 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was known for interpreting dreams in Babylon?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Daniel Joseph Moses David