Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Wild Fox Zen

Home
Buddhist
The Koan/Shikantaza Issue: Was Dogen Misguided?

The Koan/Shikantaza Issue: Was Dogen Misguided?

Last updated on: December 27, 2010 at 12:51 pm by Dosho Port

The Koan/Shikantaza Issue: Was Dogen Misguided? 2010-12-27T12:51:00-06:00 Dosho Port

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I guess there’s always more than one opinion.

@font-face { font-family: “Times New Roman”;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: “Times New Roman”; }table.MsoNormalTable { font-size: 10pt; font-family: “Times New Roman”; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; }

“k” has made several comments to a post that appeared here in October about a Dogen passage that I read as giving clear directions for doing koan introspection that featured the Boundless Way Zen teachers’ perspectives. Click here for that.

The jist of “k’s” criticism – as I understand it – is that koan introspection (particularly the “head word” technique, focusing on a single word or phrase in zazen) is a “misguided practice.” k quotes Jundo from a post at the Zen Forum International as saying that he and a couple other people Jundo respects think that Dogen viewed koan introspection in zazen to be misguided.

First, of course, I’d like to agree. On one hand, koan introspection, shikantaza, and following the breath are all quite misguided, gouging healthy flesh, wiping a perfectly clean butt.

Second and with the same hand, these practices all actualize that truth and set up the accident of awakening.

Third, I’d like to appeal for a suspension of judgments about others’ practices being “misguided.” There are, after all, many fine practitioners and Zen masters who’ve engaged in koan introspection, shikantaza and breath practice and found one or the other or all three and more to be the quintessential practice-verification of the buddhadharma.

We’re in a period now in the global culture of digesting many wonderful aspects of our human inheritance and some of us are trying to find a way for Zen to have a clear voice in choir. I don’t think anybody can see yet exactly what approach – or combination – will be the most important.

In this spirit, Dogen encouraged us not to argue about philosophical points but only inquire to see if the practice was actual (Bendowa, question 4) – especially, our own practice, of course. Awakening is the important point, not intra-sect conflict.

And what does it really matter if Dogen had the opinion that koan introspection was misguided? Despite Dogen and God having the same first three letters backwards, Zen is a path of realization, not a revealed religion. Certainly, Dogen was a brilliant, enlightened, profound practitioner and teacher. I’ve spent thousands of hours studying his teaching (really – starting with a couple thousand with Shobogenzo with Katagiri) from the time I was a young pup.

Like everybody else, he said a lot of stuff, sometimes contradictory, and was probably misguided in some ways or at least his guidance for us today, if taken literally, would be to guide us off course. Like sometimes saying that only monks could be enlightened (and by his definition of “monk” there’s only a few left). Sometimes saying lay people can too. And yes, like wiping our butts with clay balls – a Dogen endorsed practice. And to further justify the use of the visual above, I’m confident that His poop stank too, at least from time to time.

In order to be authentic dharma students and teachers, we need to devote ourselves to the way as our teachers offer(ed) it while being lanterns unto ourselves and taking responsibility without depending on others – Buddha, Dogen, Katagiri, whoever.

As for Dogen, in my view, his view was much more complex than a simple “Yes to koan introspection” or “No to koan introspection.” When he was critical of koans he was probably speaking to specific abuses he observed, maybe in his students, maybe they were doing koan introspection. He may have been giving his students guidance in what he believed was the correct way to work with koans.

He does specifically recommend taking up koan introspection in The Extensive Record of Dogen (p. 529). He sometimes says things that are precisely the “answers” to koans in the present Harada-Yasutani system, so much so that I wonder if he had access to the same material. He describes the experience of kensho in vivid and compelling ways. He often gives advice that rings true to all those I know who are engaged in koan introspection. He seems to advocate for the mu koan, for example, “Hearing Joshu’s mu the course of practice to be pursued opens up” (see Bussho, “Buddha Nature” and “Guidelines for Practicing the Way” part 8). He models the process of digesting a koan throughout the Shobogenzo. His own teacher spoke glowingly of the mu koan (see Heine’s Dogen and the Koan Tradition, p. 235). Then there are his immediate successors … and on and on.

These examples can be interpreted differently, I suppose, although it takes quite a lot of thinking. Ockham’s Razor (“the simplest of two or more competing theories is preferable”) would slice in favor of some form of koan introspection, imv.

Then there’s the unclear business of what “koan introspection” meant then and now. Dogen lived about 500 years before Hakuin cleaned up and codified the basics of the present koan system so he couldn’t have been talking exactly about what we now consider “koan introspection.”

Dogen was sometimes critical of Ta-hui, one of the key developers of the head word system, but mostly not for the system – for not breaking through himself (see Jisho-zanmai, Samadhi of the Self, Shobogenzo4, p. 41). On the other hand, he praised Ta-hui for sitting zazen even when his hemorrhoids were really severe.

When Dogen talks about shikantaza, for that matter, he doesn’t sound like most people who talk about shikantaza these days. When he talks about koans, which is about 90% of the time, he doesn’t seem to distinguish them from shikantaza. For example, in his chapter “The Healing Point of Zazen,” he uses the thinking, not-thinking, non-thinking koan to present the verified practice of zazen. He could be seen here as assigning a life koan.

In my own koan work, I sometimes focus on the key parts of a koan in zazen, the so-called head word method. I sometimes let the koan just bubble up from my belly. I sometimes call the koan to heart just as I’m falling to sleep (in bed, that is) – this is my favorite way. Sometimes the koan arises in the midst of daily life.

Like the Boundless Way teachers say in the original post, I don’t recommend any special technique to students. One of the virtues of koan introspection is how it calls for us to be creative and free – one of the central compelling characteristics of Dogen’s writing.

As both Soto master Katagiri Roshi and Rinzai master Harada Shodo Roshi taught me, “Zen practice is not something particular.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 21, 2010

Standard Observances of Soto Zen School

Next Post

December 29, 2010 Wild Fox Talk at Boundless Way Rohatsu

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 December 2016 October 2016 June 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who rebuilt the walls of Jerusalem after the exile?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Zerubbabel Nehemiah Joshua Ezra