Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Wild Fox Zen

Home
Buddhist
Two Shores of Zen: Are Western Sanghas All of That?

Two Shores of Zen: Are Western Sanghas All of That?

Last updated on: January 5, 2010 at 6:52 pm by Dosho Port

Two Shores of Zen: Are Western Sanghas All of That? 2010-01-05T18:52:00-06:00 Dosho Port

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve been reading Two Shores of Zen: An American Monk’s Japan, by Jiryu Mark Rutschman-Byler. I’d stumbled upon the book while doing some late-night poking around the web last week and then the next day I received an email from Jiryu (who I haven’t yet had the pleasure of meeting) asking if I’d review it.

I said I would but because there are several themes that his book brings up for me, I’m thinking I might put up a few posts inspired by his book – less reviews and more of a series of responses to various issues that Jiryu raises.

Chapter 2, “No Zen in the West,” for example, deserves more of a response than I could do justice in a review so I’ll write something up sometime soon on that topic. Today I want give some general sense of what’s going on in the book and then address the issue of “sangha” and “harmony” and “not making yourself better than others.” In this post, I get controversial at the end so you might gird your attention loins and stick it out until the end (or, yeah, scroll away) if you are attracted to such things.

Jiryu is a young priest (about 30) – an anomaly in American Soto Zen where the average age of a priest with dharma transmission is 65 and the average age of priests-in-training like Jiryu is 58 (yes, thems the real “reliable” numbers – crunched em myself – and we could be in deep trouble with the Last of the Mohicans soundtrack about to become our very own if things don’t change). If this tradition is going to survive with any strength, I’m praying for more like him in age and spunk!

Looks like we believe that 60 is the new 40. Well, 53 doesn’t feel like 40 to me!

Anyway, Jiryu is a priest in the San Francisco Zen system who isn’t averse to cussing, at least in print – and I like that. After some years of practice, including at Tassajara, Jiryu became concerned with what he saw going on around him, struggled to be nice, but had to admit that he found the practice lacking the intensity and single-mindedness that he’d found in Zen lore, so off he went to Japan, looking for the real deal.

Jiryu trained both at a traditional monastery with a history going back to one of Dogen’s students, Hokyoji, and a not-so-traditional monastery, Bukkokuji (pictured above), with Harada Tangen Roshi – the only surviving direct discendent of Harada Diun Roshi (of the Yasutani-Harada lineage and thus the White Plum, Diamond Sangha, and Kapleau Roshi lineages to name just a few).

I too trained at Bukkokuji in 1990-91 and find Jiryu’s descriptions of his experiences very evocative and quite similar to my own. Harada Tangen Roshi is the real deal. Everyplace is different but if you want a clear view of Bukkokuji and get a sense of practice in Japan, read this book.

However, I find that my own interest piques in his descriptions of San Francisco Zen Center. I’ve visited their various centers a few times, had friends that were high up in the organization, even helped foil their attempts in about ’85 to make Katagiri Roshi abbot after Baker Roshi left (another story!) but am very much an outsider, an interested onlooker. Katagiri Roshi helped get the place started afterall and Zen Mind Beginner’s Mind, Crooked Cucumber and Shoes Outside the Door have all been important books for me in very different ways – all three are really important contributions to American Zen, imv.

So I’ve watched from afar, usually living in the fly-over, far from one of the shores of Zen. Okay, that’s one minor beef I have with the book – “two shores” is so Californiacentric, so Californicationish, forgetting perhaps that there’s more to Zen than what’s going on in the altered state and the old country.

So Jiryu struggled with priests living comfortably with spouses and kids, the lack of zazen zeal, organizational priorities, etc., and told his SF teacher that this was all “bullshit.”

His teacher’s response included the following, “A disciple of Buddha does not disparage the triple treasure. Please be careful. Don’t make yourself better than the rest of us. I think you know that’s the furthest thing from our practice.”

Jiryu’s comments here summarize much of his perspective: I do know that; I have heard it many times anyway. But I’m frustrated, and I’m tired, and it’s dawning on me, like a slow, unstoppable train, that if I’m really serious about this Buddhism thing, I may well need to abandon this California imitation of it. I don’t mean to disparage the Sangha, my peers and my teachers, but I have vowed to end all suffering, my own and others’. And I’ve glimpsed the possibility of that kind of salvation, but the lifestyle here is not pushing me to take the plunge, to realize the one final truth that will shatter all delusions and liberate all beings.

Now that’s all well and good. I’d say, “What’s holding you back? Sit until you break through your zafu, etc.”

What concerns me is Jiryu’s teacher’s response, “Don’t make yourself better than the rest of us.” On the one hand, “making” yourself better than others really isn’t possible (what’s the measure?) so what’s the point of saying it? And on the other hand, is it a violation of the tenth of the ten grave precepts, “not disparage the triple treasure,” by suggesting that your co-practitioners are engaged in some bullshit?

In order to disparge the sangha, the community of San Francisco Zen Center, or any Zen Center (I could say dharma center but rather stay closer to home), would have to be a “sangha” in the triple treasures of buddha, dharma and sangha.

The value of the triple treasures lies in how they are reliable refuges in the ocean of suffering like the old buddha or the dharma teachings and practices. What constitutes a sangha, a community of practitioners, whom we can rely on?

According to the Buddha, the sangha was composed of people who had become home-leavers, following all the hundreds of precepts (which we mostly do not in Zen) and/or those who had attained stream entry (a kensho-esque initial breakthrough). Following all those precepts restricts activity to the point that it makes sense to me that a person would be reliable – at least on the surface – because they couldn’t even tickle anyone without having to confess it. Breakthrough experiences … well, I’m less convinced (and am speaking about myself too, just to be clear).

In the Mahayana, especially in China, the definition of sangha expanded to include birds and trees, tiles, rocks and pebbles. This was an important expansion of our tribe to no boundaries. And yet … the definition also collapses any practical utility. A bird is really reliably a bird and doesn’t much care if a priest calls his/her lifestyle bullshit.

Maybe it’s just me being presumptuous, but I find using the “sangha” word a bit presumptuous and call myself and those who practice here a practice community because, let me be clear, I am unreliable.

And I haven’t found others reliable either, including Katagiri Roshi – that’s either one of the wonderful qualities of humans that I usually enjoy or is a cynical song of experience or both.

My view that people are unreliability, btw, includes people who are members at Zen Centers, enlightened teachers, and myself as I said. Even if only finally, in death, everybody is unreliable.

In other words, the reliable thing about people is their unreliability. To assert that anybody who wanders through the doors of a Zen Center and pays dues is sangha (in any sense other than birds and trees) and therefore a reliable refuge is really idealistic and doesn’t really prepare a community for the hard parts of the journey. It’s like cutting out the horrific dragons and witches from fairy stories.

My first sesshin with Daido Roshi, I said to him, “Seems like a really good group of practitioners.”

“Aa,” he said, “they’re just barely alright.”

Anyway, if someone were sangha, shouldn’t we honor them by meeting them completely, playing full out, with whatever can be said fairly and kindly? This is part of the “mutual polishing” (more about that in the future for our online practice community) practice of the Japanese monastic system that we don’t do much of here in the US. “Ugly potatoes in potato peeler,” said Katagiri Roshi, “all become shiny and beautiful.”

Anyway, the importance of reliability is overstated, especially when we need incredible creativity and boldness to establish Zen practice in such a way that it can be transmitted to future generations.

Therefore, to suggest that Jiryu’s earnest-sounding doubts about San Francisco Zen Center (and American Zen generally) – maybe like the kid who saw that the emperor had no clothes and was willing to call out – should not be raised because he’s breaking the precepts seems like both a way of repressing investigation in order to maintain the organizational status-quo and a missed opportunity for a full-out meeting.

Comments welcome, of course. Let’s explore this more together.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 2, 2010

Zen and Service

Next Post

January 9, 2010 What is Great Practice?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 December 2016 October 2016 June 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the shortest verse in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

"Rejoice always." "I am." "Jesus wept." "God is love."