Unravelling the Thought: More on the Illusion of the Coast Moving

Last updated on: July 19, 2009 at 11:22 pm by Dosho Port

Unravelling the Thought: More on the Illusion of the Coast Moving 2009-07-19T23:22:00-06:00 Dosho Port

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A full weekend with a family reunion – the Polish side of the family – and a day at my brother’s cabin. In-between I’ve been nibbling on Jeffrey Hopkin’s Emptiness in the Mind-Only School of Buddhism.

It has a lot to say, and oh those Tibetan Buddhists can say it so! clearly, about the Genjokoan passage that we’re working with in the Dogen Study Group.

…When we conceive our body and mind in a confused way and grasp all things with discriminating mind, we mistakenly think that the self-nature of our own mind is permanent. When we intimately practice and return right here, it is clear that all things have no self.

A couple question might come up here. First, why is it that we’re confused and cling to confusion when practicing intimately is so sweet? Second, specifically how is the discrimination mind mistaken?

Here’s a longish piece from Hopkin’s work that addresses the second question with the three natures: imputational, other-power, and thoroughly established. You might have to take a deep breath and read this a couple three times or so.

The Sutra of Unravelling the Thought attributes this process in the past as creating and reinforcing misperception. That’s one way to address the first question.

Here it is (p. 26-27):

In Buddhism in general, suffering is viewed as being induced by actions motivated by afflictive emotions, which in turn, are grounded in misperception of the nature of phenomena. More specifically, the Sutra of Unraveling the Thought … frames this process as stemming from the superimposition of a false status – called and imputational nature – on impermanent phenomena.

These phenomena are called “other-powered natures because they are objects under the influence of something other than themselves – that is, under the influence of causes and conditions. Other-powered natures do not have the power to stay for a second moment. No matter what they are – bodies, minds, tables, chairs, houses – most beings see them falsely, as if they were solid and could remain, as if they were under their own power, whereas actually they cannot remain even for a second moment since they are under the influence of the force of causes and conditions outside themselves.

More specifically, those causes and conditions are predispositions, internal seeds, etchings on the mind by former perceptions that, when activated, produce an appearance of an object and a consciousness for pays attention to it. The same seed causes the appearance of the object and the appearance of the subject, much as in a dream. …Contrary to such superimpositions, the final mode of being of other-powered natures, their emptiness of these imputational natures, is called the “thoroughly established natures.” The distinguishing feature of a thoroughly established nature is that it is a final object of observation by a path of purification. It must be something cognizance of which will remove obstructions built on unfounded misperceptions with respect to phenomena.

Although dense, this clearly points to the study of the self that is the Buddha Way. We’ll work through this during the class on Monday night and I may have more for you Tuesday.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 17, 2009

Simple Zazen: What is the Hara?

Next Post

July 21, 2009 The Moon Reflected In the Water: 100 Day Practice Announcement

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 December 2016 October 2016 June 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was known for his great strength and long hair?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Elijah David Peter Samson