Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Wild Fox Zen

Home
Buddhist
A Snapper on the Road and Big Mind

A Snapper on the Road and Big Mind

Last updated on: June 21, 2009 at 3:14 pm by Dosho Port

A Snapper on the Road and Big Mind 2009-06-21T15:14:00-06:00 Dosho Port

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This morning I sipped coffee on the deck and waited for the kids to get up to make Fathers’ Day breakfast. I picked up the Summer 2009 issue of Tricycle

that a student had left for me. There I found a couple interesting letters to the editor about Big Mind, one from Seigaku Kigen Ekeson Osho and a response from Genpo Merzel.

In about 1990, I participated in a week-long priest training with Maezumi Roshi at Dogen’s original temple, Koshoji, near Kyoto. Genpo also attended. He and I hit it off and snuck off grounds at least once for a beer, sharing and comparing our experiences training with our teachers. Complaining about them too – although Katagiri Roshi had died recently so I wasn’t too whiney. Anyway, Genpo ain’t no sock monkey (readers of Brad Warner’s blog know what I mean).

To simplify the arguments in the Tricycle letters, Seigaku voices the traditionalist view that doubts Big Mind can lead to the same enlightenment as our Zen ancestors “…who sweated blood for decades before realizing its truths.”

Genpo, the innovator voice, says that students using Big Mind “…have shown more openness and compassion in their daily life as well as less of the rigidness that often occurs in traditional Zen training.”

Sounds better than sweating blood, no?

Big Mind comes from the

Voice Dialogue

process of Hal and Sidra Stone. Genpo and others in the White Plum lineage worked with them and have modified- or perhaps gone beyond – Voice Dialogue and applied it to Zen work. The method is quite controversial in Zen circles and my sense is that a majority of teachers (including at least some in the White Plum) are critical.

Genpo argues that the Big Mind experience creates the same kind of kensho experiences (

see this video on the Big Mind site, for example

) as does years of zazen.

Several years ago I attended a weekend workshop in this process (although they didn’t call it Big Mind) at Great Vow Zen Monastery, led by Chozen and Hogen Bays. The hub of the practice as I understood it is that each of us

are

different voices – the skeptic, the lover, the critic, the spiritual seeker, the witness, etc. When we regard each of these voices as “not me, not mine, not the self,” we are not suckered by them and they can all drop off more easily.

I found it to be a helpful way of communicating about nonattachment – and experiencing it. To say, even in our inner dialogue, “I notice a critical voice that says…,” helps provide breathing room between subject and subject.

Further, I was impressed at the workshop at the number of people – at least 1/3 of those participating – who reported what Hogen and Chozen called “Buddha Mind” after just a day or so of practicing this method, including a Zen priest who said she’d been practicing about 10 years and never had this depth of experience, sitting up late into the night with it. This seemed like really rapid settling down, much more so than the usual sesshin experience where after a day of zazen, most people are “very crabby at self and others,” according to my stages (see

Keep Me in Your Heart Awhile

Here’s the “what I think” part. First, I welcome Big Mind on to the Zen scene. A creative redesign of the process of Zen is really important, as important for the traditionalists as for the creatives. It gives both predispositions something to rub up against and wrestle with.

I have two major concerns. First, the method (especially the way Genpo talks about it in the video linked above) views zazen as a means to an end, a way to “…open the lens of the mind and look around,” as he puts it.

Encouraging this orientation to practice, undermines and obscures “…that there is absolutely nothing to be attained,” and puts off practicing as such until some other magical day when the camera lens opens completely.

Second, what Genpo seems to be describing and what people at the workshop I attended seemed to be experiencing were “boon experiences.” Genpo says that in these experiences subject and object are still separate, that Big Mind opens the lens so that the person can look around.

The self is chasing after objects rather than being confirmed by the 10,000 things advancing.

Here’s what I say in my book about boon experiences:

The “Ahhhh!” of Zen is not limited to the boon experiences, sometimes called “Big Mind” in some strands of contemporary Zen, that many students crave. Boon experiences are private mental incidents characterized by bliss, clarity, and non-conceptuality. They are like passing clouds and are neither samadhi (which is characterized by stability) nor realization (characterized by nondual insight). Boon experiences do not reach the standard of the ancient way nor reveal the meaning of Katagiri Roshi’s “Ahhh!” Throw them away as any deluded human sentiment.

Summary: If Big Mind encourages the means-ends drama that we’re using to chew up the earth (and each other), then I’m concerned that this way of making peace will lead to more war. And if the Big Mind process is mislabeling boon experiences as kensho, then I share Seigaku’s point above, “to learn takes effort,” and a short cut may be a detour.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 21, 2009

Whitewater Rafting

Next Post

June 24, 2009 Big Mind: Does Size Really Matter?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 December 2016 October 2016 June 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "It is finished"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jesus John Paul Peter