Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Wild Fox Zen

Home
Buddhist
On Shikantaza

On Shikantaza

Last updated on: October 8, 2008 at 1:17 pm by Dosho Port

On Shikantaza 2008-10-08T13:17:00-06:00 Dosho Port

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Here’s an email from a Zen teacher that I deeply respect, Barry Magid (a successor of Joko Beck) and my long-winded response. We had exchanged emails about my book and some concerns about “wholeheartedness.”

I highly recommend his recent book, Ending the Pursuit of Happiness: A Zen Guide. Barry’s psychoanalytic training has given him an extremely valuable perspective and fitting language especially suited to clarifying barriers that many modern practitioners face, including our “secret practice.”

Dosho – so here’s a question for you about being “wholehearted.”

Some folks who say shikantaza is nothing in particular & can’t be identified with any “state” that can be done right or wrong, and is not to be identified with concentration or samadhi – turn around and use wholeheartedness to mean a particular state of absorption or non-separation with the activity at hand. So instead of emphasizing a particular state of mind on the cushion, they kick it upstairs to a particular state of mind during activity…..You don’t do that do you? How do you prevent your students from falling into this mistaken assumption?

Me, I just quote Woody Allen about showing up. If anxious, bow anxiously, if tired bow tired. Don’t try to be “mindful” or anything else. Be what you are; stay aware of what/who you are moment to moment; just do it with the mind/body you already have….

Do you know Carolyn Atkinson? she’s a teacher in Kobun’s lineage. She wrote a book – Quiet Mind, Open Heart – I enjoyed very much but which challenged my usual sense of the meaning of “shikantaza.” In it she talks about shitantaza as a concentration practice – explicitly cultivating a state of thought-free silence & depth – and contrasts this with vipassana – which she also teaches – which she says is a wide-focussed awareness of the arising & disappearing of thought….Her description of vipassana actually sounds more like Uchiyama’s version of (Opening the Hand of Thought) Shikantaza – her shikantaza, more like my experience of MU……..You been around alot – is “shikantaza” used both ways out there in Soto-land? And is there any basis for calling one or the other “authentic?”

Barry

Barry,

I appreciate you raising the issues but (oh my god) in my limited experience I find an enormous range of actual practices under the single term “shikantaza” from following the breath (much of SF Zen from Suzuki’s lifetime practice) to mindfulness of body (the rest of SF Zen w/ Reb) to a samadhi practice (Tangen Harada’s version) to just spacing out (often those without a teacher) to mindfulness of mind (apparently part of the White Plum – at least Daido’s version – and even Uchiyama and Shohaku’s in the sense that opening the hand of thought is about mind).

Katagiri used to say shikantaza isn’t anything in particular and that also fits for the Soto school’s lack of single view on the issue – and it is pretty “Japanese” too in that they might talk politely about shikantaza publicly and mean very different things privately which wouldn’t be discussed much ’cause it is rude to raise differences and soil the harmony.

Katagiri also called following the breath shikantaza but once I could follow the breath, told me to not attach to anything. At least several of his successors, though, just teach following the breath as shikantaza.

So a few more rambling thoughts on something that is a subject dear to me….

My understanding of history is that prior to Dogen the Caodong school did silent illumination meditation which was severely criticized for sinking into quietism – a fitting criticism because it leads to a zombie kind of practitioner, imv, that still pops up today. Dogen’s brilliant reframe on this practice and reconstruction of the tradition was based on adding “wholeheartedness” which changed silent illumination into “earnest vivid sitting” (literal trans. of shikantaza).

I’m not familiar with Carolyn Atkinson’s book and am kinda surprised because my limited acquaintance with Kobun and what he taught is not at all so clean and tidy shamata/vipassana that you describe. So even within lineage, in just a generation, the core practice moves a lot. I think this is one of the poisons/medicines in Soto.

By the way, I’m of the persuasion that American Soto would be served by consciously identifying Dogen’s work as source texts of the tradition (although I grant that there are a lot of problems with that) because at least it would give us a clearer starting point for discussion and we might also better understand when we’re adapting the tradition and when we’re not.

RE: “wholeheartedness,” what I encourage is full devotion to no particular thing. That’s a little different from seeing wholeheartedness as a state. For one thing, I emphasize the “whole” and “heart” parts of wholehearted – nothing left out, including the flowing emotions. Nothing left out includes samadhi states, dhyanic states, and insight/realization as well. But like a falling maple leaf, showing front, showing back.

Recently when a student talked about seeing his practice washing the dishes as a particular mind state (traditional mindfulness with Puritanical overtones) I told him that his approach didn’t seem very loving – excluded spacing out, resistance, etc. Since then I’ve been talking with others in this way. I see wholeheartedness as very much like love – not any particular state but including the swoons of early romantic attraction and then all the rest of the emotional array including dislike – but still we love.

It seems to me that the universe has this wholehearted quality and that when we step back, that’s what we become too, rather than holding back and posturing in some way, trying to freeze the flow of being/nonbeing. Posturing, of course, is also not the enemy.

I see sitting on the cushion as one form of “doing.”

I just looked up the characters for “wholehearted” in the Fukanzazengi, like the part when Dogen says “Although they say that there are ten thousand distinctions and a thousand variations, they just wholeheartedly engage the way of zazen.” That last phrase literally is something like “only hit seat diligently.” In other places too, “wholeheartedly” seems to be used for “only” and “diligently.”

Dogen doesn’t give a specific set of appropriate objects – like the breath – (or lack thereof) for his wholeheartedness. The only time I know that he mentions the breath is in the Extensive Record where it isn’t at all like we talk about following the breath.

Anywho, this nonspecific object leaves the door wide open in this practice, imv, to include cultural developments in awareness – which is what I think you are doing by including your “analytic training to uncover the latent gaining ideas.”

Maybe more than enough. Such a simple thing and yet so much to say.

Dosho

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 7, 2008

Work World Koan

Next Post

October 11, 2008 What Can We Do?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 December 2016 October 2016 June 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the main language spoken by Jews during Jesus’ time?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Aramaic Latin Greek Hebrew