Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

welcometable

The Judge – Part 3: Meeting with the Public Defender

Last updated on: August 5, 2020 at 9:07 am   by Margaret Blair Young

The Judge – Part 3: Meeting with the Public Defender 2020-08-05T09:07:50-07:00 Margaret Blair Young

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is the note I sent to Maye’s support team just after she was jailed: “The situation is serious. If [she] is convicted, she could spend 25 years in prison.” She was twenty-four years old at the time. Such a sentence would’ve kept her behind bars until she was forty-nine. If all twenty-seven charges had been answered with additional prison time, she could well have been looking at life in prison.

In the bail reduction hearing, the public defenders chose not to reveal an important fact.  Maye was pregnant. A few weeks after her incarceration, she had realized this. Her morning sickness was severe and kept her in the jail’s medical unit for long stretches of time. (I’m certain that the trauma she was enduring was also a part of her medical needs.)

Since I was aware of these facts, I was surprised that the two public defenders didn’t mention her pregnancy and its complications at the hearing. I met with them three days later. This is my record from my affidavit:

“I met with the public defenders on October 22nd, 2015, three days after the hearing, to voice my concerns. They explained to me that they had not mentioned Maye’s pregnancy nor her time in the jail’s medical unit because they feared that the judge would assume that a pregnant, black, single woman was probably also on drugs.”

Consider that. The public defenders had thought that the judge would assume stereotypes about Maye if her pregnancy were revealed. I asked flat out, “Are you telling me that the judge is racist?”

One of the public defenders responded, “Let’s just say he’s  very conservative.” I’ll let the readers interpret what he meant by that.

I met again with the public defenders after I purchased the recording of the preliminary hearing and recognized that it had been altered. I asked the head public defender (RT) if he remembered saying, “Your honor? Innocent until proven guilty?” He answered that he did indeed remember and then asked, “Isn’t it in there?” I told him that it was not. He shook his head. I remember the look on his face vividly and his grim half-smile. It was not a surprised look but one of powerless acknowledgment, a “Yes, this happens and there’s nothing I can do about it” look. I still wonder how often he had seen the sort of misconduct I was pointing out.

My affidavit states this:

The judge’s words, which I heard him repeat at least twice (it is my impression that he repeated them four times, but I am testifying only to what I can be completely certain of) were, “In my court, she is guilty.”  After the public defender, XXXXX, said, “Your Honor?  Innocent until proven guilty?” the judge changed his inflection but not his words.  He said, “In MY court, she is guilty.”  After a few moments, the judge said, “Let me revise myself.”  He then introduced the concept of “probable cause.”  In the audio transcription, the entire portion of his declaring Maykela guilty has been editd out, as well as XXX’s reminder of the judicial standard.  We hear [the judge] come in at point 8.14 saying, “We’re not presuming guilt, I changed my statement, but there is probable cause.”  When he says, “I changed my statement,” he is referring to his statement, “In my court, she is guilty.” The context and reference were unmistakable in court, though not so clear in the audio recording as it stands now after editing.

The defendant was not up against only the charges, but against systemic racism itself.

I was in some mild state of shock after what I saw in the courthouse, and could only imagine what Maye was going through. As I looked at the judge, I had important but unvoiced questions for him. I will voice them now.

  1. Have you always lived in a predominantly white society? How do you prepare to treat members of a minority group fairly? What do you do to learn to love and respect those with darker skin than yours? (I will mention here that I have a close friend who serves as a judge in the same courthouse and who has learned Spanish in order to better serve Latino defendants. He has often written to people he has found guilty of particular charges and has followed their lives with encouragement, sending them notes of congratulations when they have reached an educational goal or gotten married. He has also faithfully attended Martin Luther King Day commemorations and supported Civil Rights causes.)
  2. Since you are a judge in Utah and in your sixties, you are either a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or are familiar with the details of Church history and culture. Did you ever believe or teach that Blacks were cursed or that they were “less valliant” in a pre-mortal life than those born white? If you once believed such false doctrine (see the official repudiation in this  essay). what steps have you taken to re-train your heart to see clearly?
    (Since I will be copying this text and the link will not carry over, these are the words of the disavowal from the Church’s Race and Priesthood essay:
    “Today, the Church disavows the theories advanced in the past that black skin is a sign of divine disfavor or curse, or that it reflects unrighteous actions in a premortal life; that mixed-race marriages are a sin; or that blacks or people of any other race or ethnicity are inferior in any way to anyone else. Church leaders today unequivocally condemn all racism, past and present, in any form.”)
  3. When you notice racism in your thoughts or actions, how do you address it? How do you repent of it?
  4. What actions do you take to diversify your world so that your actions reflect equal and universal respect for all humans?

I have done some often painful self-reflection since the events I’m recording here happened. My conclusions about myself are that I still need to watch my words, actions, and thoughts for arrogance, self-centeredness, and any sense of entitlement. It is a daily challenge for me as I press forward. My personal scriptural theme is Isaiah 58: 12:

“Thou shalt raise up the foundations of many generations; and thou shalt be called, The repairer of the breach, The restorer of paths to dwell in.”

For all of us who want to “repair the breach” within the human family, there is simply no time for self-pity, self-justification, or procrastination. The day is far spent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I

.

 

 

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



August 4, 2020

The Judge, Part 2: Silencing

Next Post



August 6, 2020 The Judge - Part 4: The Plea Deal


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Ancestors family conflict in the scriptures race and religion Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 July 2025 April 2025 March 2025 January 2025 November 2024 May 2024 April 2024 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 June 2023 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 October 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 March 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 June 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 September 2018 August 2018 May 2018 March 2018 January 2018 November 2017 October 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 March 2017 February 2017 November 2016 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 November 2015 August 2015 July 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What happened to the prison doors when Paul and Silas were praying and singing hymns?

Select your answer to see how you score.

An earthquake shook the prison and the doors flew open An angel opened them They miraculously unlocked A guard opened them

Related posts from The Welcome Table

Latter-day Saint

I Revised Section 132

The Welcome Table

Latter-day Saint

See Trump for Who He Is

The Welcome Table

Latter-day Saint

Church Ball and the Genesis Team

The Welcome Table

Latter-day Saint

False Revelation,1969

The Welcome Table

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Did Prayer Cure His Cancer? Or Was It...

At 4 AM one morning, Joshua W. Brown’s wife awoke to a...

8 Ways a Near-Death Experience Rewires the Soul

Does Consciousness Survive Physical Death? After 50 Years of Research, Dr. Raymond...

Holy Longing: What Our Restlessness Is Telling Us

“One can find so many pains when the rain is falling.” -John...

The Making of a Dumbass

  What this is NOT about.  This blog is definitely not about...

Who Told You That?

Who said the Israelites were God’s chosen? That’s right, they did. Who...

The Spirit World Is the Real World: God...

A Monk’s Wisdom on Body and Spirit I sit with Brother Martin...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube