In The Process Of The Incarnation, God Took What Was Human, And Raised It Up To Reveal Himself

Last updated on: April 3, 2012 at 10:24 am by Henry Karlson

In The Process Of The Incarnation, God Took What Was Human, And Raised It Up To Reveal Himself 2012-04-03T10:24:22-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A common theme of the prophets was that God was not pleased with, did not want, did not need, the sacrifices which were rendered to him. “What to me is the multitude of your sacrifices? says the LORD; I have had enough of burnt offerings of rams and the fat of fed beasts; I do not delight in the blood of bulls, or of lambs, or of he-goats” (Isa. 1:11 RSV). It is our hearts, minds, and souls which the Lord wants. “For I desire steadfast love and not sacrifice, the knowledge of God, rather than burnt offerings” (Hos. 6:6 RSV). The Law gave sacrificial rules, to be sure, but it was misunderstood by Israel. They loved the sacrifices, they loved what it offered them, but they didn’t turn themselves through such actions to God, which is what God wanted: “They love sacrifice; they sacrifice flesh and eat it; but the LORD has no delight in them. Now he will remember their iniquity, and punish their sins; they shall return to Egypt” (Hos. 8:13 RSV). Israel had learned to love the letter of the Law, but not the Spirit, the Spirit which would have directed them to God and given them true life. In turning away from God they found themselves imprisoned by sin, mystically represented by Egypt. The purpose of the Law and the Prophets was to point to Christ, to connect the ways of the world to Christ, to slowly educate and direct Israel (and through Israel, us). It was to move us away from mere human constructs, such as worldly sacrifices, so that we can find ourselves in the Kingdom of God.

At the Transfiguration, Moses and Elijah were seen as representatives of Moses and the Prophets. At Tabor, the Apostles who witnessed the event wanted to make booths, to restrict Moses, the Prophets and Christ to the letter of their understanding; this is common for all of us. We learn something, we experience something, we try to keep it where we are at, to form booths which restrict us from the fullness of the experience, to keep to the pattern we understand and not let the depth of the mystery out. This is very human, and explains why Israel misunderstood the Law. They became so encased with the sacrifices that they thought the sacrifices were the point. They did not understand that they were to be symbols of what lay beyond them: the cross of Christ. They were tools by which God used the understanding of the time to point to the transcendent truth of the cross.

Humanity had long come to believe in sacrifice, in the need for sacrifice, to create balance in the world. Even human sacrifice was seen as a possibility, where one could be expected to sacrifice one’s beloved to God if human sin was great. Abraham misunderstood God in the same way as the rest of humanity: he believed God wanted human sacrifice, the sacrifice of Isaac, and he was willing to accept the command as he understood it because human sacrifice was common all around him. He was a man of his time and yet a man of God. This is why he could be taught, why he could be shown the error of his understanding, and so why Isaac could be saved. Through Isaac, the whole of humanity could be saved, because humanity was shown God did not need any human sacrifice to be pleased with his creation. God used the symbol of the time, the ways in which Abraham understood divinity, but took them and transformed them, helping to reveal a little of the spiritual truth contained in them. Isaac was saved and a ram was killed, showing that God is willing to move beyond human constructs, human expectations, and that what was important was the symbol contained in them. “But when the ram was killed, and Isaac was not killed, it happened thus because Isaac was a figure and not the reality; for in him was designated what was later fulfilled in Christ.”[1] With Abraham, humanity had moved a step forward; but there was still a sense that sacrifice of some sort was important and needed, so the kind of sacrifice changed, though this too, was not what God wanted. He wanted a contrite heart, a person sacrificing their ego, their false perception of the world, so to be open to him. But God was willing to show this through symbol, through the slow education of humanity. It would move forward with the Law of Moses, where one finds much spiritual truth and power. The truth was there, so that Israel contained the message of the truth, but it was rare for the truth to be understood in its fullness, to see the Spirit which was manifested by the Law. The whole of human history, even outside of Israel, contained movements of the Spirit to direct and guide it to the Kingdom of God. Spiritual truths are found throughout the world encased by all kinds of worldly systems and misunderstanding, similar to, but not to the same level, as the truths contained in Israel and its Covenant.

It is in Christ that the fullness of revelation came to the world. As the expectation of the nations, all the spiritual truths of the world, wherever they were found, were fulfilled and shown their proper end. This is not to say they are no longer useful, no longer have value. For such truths always have value, but how they are understood has been transformed. Israel and the Temple represent the world and all that is within it: Jesus is the true high priest who offers the one true sacrifice, himself, on the cross. All the sacrifices, all the sin offerings of the Law, merely point to and typify something of Christ, and their power and strength came not from themselves, but from Christ. The physical sacrifices were not, of themselves, anything; the spirit of the sacrifices is what rendered them to be of benefit, and it was the Spirit which connected them to Christ, to let them prefigure Christ, and to allow grace flow through Israel. But their value remains, and this is why we still read of the Law and what it taught. We can be directed by the Spirit to see beyond them, to show universal truths in them, such as how they show different ways in which we can gain grace, as Origen explains the sacrifices for sins in Leviticus:

And you, therefore, when you come to the grace of baptism, offer a ‘calf,’ for ‘you are baptizes into Christ’s death.’ But when you are let to martyrdom, you offer a ‘he-goat,’ because you kill the devil, the originator of sins. When you give alms and bestow the love of mercy moved by pity toward those in need, you load the sacred altar with fat goats. For ‘if you should forgive your brother’s sin from your heart’ and, having laid aside the tumor of your rage, gather within you a mild and simple spirit, be assured, you have killed your ram or offered your sheep in a sacrifice. Furthermore, if, instructed in the divine readings ‘by meditating as a dove’ and by keeping watch in ‘the Law’ of the Lord ‘day and night,’ you should convert the sinner from his error and call him back from worthless wickedness to the innocence of a dove; and if, by clinging to the saints, you should make him imitate the fellowship of a dove, you offered to the Lord ‘a pair of turtledoves or two young pigeons.’[2]

God used what humanity had given, but did not want humanity to be stuck in the way of destruction: God wanted humanity to see the foolishness of it, so that we can instead follow him in spirit and in truth. The Spirit provided the means, the power, by which many were led to the good through such human means, but the Spirit then also directed them (as we saw in the prophets) to understand the true meaning of the act. We are to circumcise our hearts to have true circumcision, we are to render ourselves in love to God to render God a true sacrifice, one which he is pleased with, one which he will take, one which he will merge with Christ so as to bring us to the resurrection in glory. The Law points to the truth, and so has the truth in it, but it is not the fullness of truth. The Law cannot be kept to the letter and have life, because the letter of the Law cuts one off from the Spirit which uses the Law for an end beyond the Law itself. And, yet, the Law, or the human constructs in which God desired to show himself, is engraced so that humanity can be led to higher and higher truths until we can be free in Christ. Thus, we are shown, in salvation history, three different eras to help show us the movement we are to take: from nature to the Law to Christ, where each level gives knowledge and grace greater than the last. Thus, Hugh of St. Victor talks about how God instituted sacraments, not just in the Church, but in all of human history:

Sacraments were instituted from the beginning for the restoration and guardianship of man, some under the natural law, some under the written law, some under grace. And among these those which have been posterior in time are always found more worthy of the effect of spiritual grace. For all of those sacraments of earlier times, whether under the natural law or under the written, were signs, as it were, and figures of those which now have been set forth under grace. And the spiritual effect which they operated in their own time when placed before these, they operated by that virtue and sanctification which they assume from these.[3]

To properly understand the Law, to properly be directed by it, we must understand the Spirit of the Law, to understand what God saw he could use in it to direct to the fullness of truth. We must not be caught, as so many, in the letter, to think it was the sacrifices, the rules and regulations, are what mattered – in and of themselves. It was what they pointed to, Christ, which mattered, and how Christ was able to encompass them and lead us through them to eternal life. God takes what is human in the incarnation and makes it his own; the process of the incarnation is not started with the yes of Mary, but with the history of creation – God slowly incarnated himself, taking in the human condition, taking in what humanity offered and giving a conditional yes to it if he can use it to represent his incarnation. It is not because he always wanted what humanity gave, but he liked that humanity sought to give to him – sought to make itself one with him, and through that self-giving of humanity, perfectly manifested in Mary, God became man and the whole of creation was given a mediator who could properly render it to God, not through nihilistic destruction (as the way of the past), but in transformation, where what is good and true can be given eternal life.

[1] St. Caesarius of Arles, Sermon 84, in St. Caesarius of Arles: Sermons 81 – 186. Trans. Sister Mary Magdeleine Mueller, O.S.F. (Washington, DC: CUA Press, 1964). 18.

[2] Origen, Homilies on Leviticus. Trans. Gary Wayne Barkley (Washington, DC: CUA Press, 1990), 48. Origen continues with other ways our actions can be seen prefigured in the sacrifices of the Law, showing in the end, that the Christian has as much access to grace as the Law, and that we should not feel as if the Law had more ways to deal with sin.

[3] Hugh of St. Victor, On the Sacraments of the Christian Faith. Trans. Roy J. Deferrari (Cambridge: The Medievael Academy of America, 1951), 182.

Grace

Henry Karlson

Sacraments

Previous Post

April 2, 2012

Holy Week is the School of Humility

Next Post

April 4, 2012 Is This What Christ Died For?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Paul tell the Ephesians not to let the sun go down on?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Your anger Your disputes Your sin Your unforgiveness