Over-Simplicity is the Foundation of Heresy

Last updated on: February 29, 2012 at 11:17 am by Henry Karlson

Over-Simplicity is the Foundation of Heresy 2012-02-29T11:17:44-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The proper reading of text is often much more difficult to accomplish than the average person assumes. There is a belief that if one just reads a text, unless it is purposefully created to be a riddle, one just can pick up a text, read it and understand it. The questions which are required for proper exegesis do not cross the mind of the average reader, and so they do not understand what they read with any depth. They can come out of their reading misunderstanding the point of the text itself. This is especially true with religious texts. The fact that how one reads the text, with the assumptions one brings to the text, might lead to what one gets out of the text does not cross their mind. This can be seen in how people will overlook criticism they give to scriptures of religious traditions which are not their own while they find a way to overlook such criticism from their own text. Can they not at least consider that the way they overlook the problem from their own tradition might also apply to other traditions as well?[1]

Christians should be very concerned when someone says that the Bible is a simple text and one just picks it up, reads it, and follows it as if its meaning is obvious when one reads it. The fact that many pick up the Bible and come out with differing interpretations should suggest that this is not the case. But people don’t consider that. They have been raised to believe that it is written just for them and they will simply understand it once they read it. It’s a cultural phenomenon in the United States, leading person after person telling others that they don’t really follow the Bible all because the other person understands it differently. Now, the Bible is not a free-for-all book, but the way it is treated in society makes it such, so that the Bible is often the foundation for theological relativism and not its counter. Everyone reads it, everyone believes their reading is valid, and there really is no one to tell them to the contrary because, of course, if someone did it just means they were the ones not following the Bible. Politicians who like to call out other politicians for not following the Bible, acting as if the Bible is a simple text and its meaning is obvious to all readers, are a danger to Christianity because they want to use the Bible for their own pretext instead of dealing with the contextual questions one might raise in order to proper employ the Bible for one’s life. Historically, this is how many great heresies formed. Someone took their own ideology, read it into the Bible, and believed that what they got out of the Bible based upon their ideological reading is honest, simple reading of the text which must be followed. And because they could find passages which, on a simple, unexamined level seem to support their ideology, they proclaimed themselves the teachers of the truth when they were anything but it.[2]

We can look, for example, at how one is to understand God according to the Christian Scripture. A simple approach makes God very human. For a simple reading of God in Scripture will come out with a vision of God quite different from the Christian tradition: he repents, he has to ask questions to gather information, he lets his passions get the best of him, he had bodily parts, et. al. A simple by the letter reading of the text will not get to the meaning of the text. To ask if a text contains metaphor requires one to move beyond a simple reading of the text. But once one understands the Bible uses metaphor, that it discusses God with words coming from human experience but which do not really represent the divine reality, one begins to understand the difficulty in interpreting the Bible. How does one understand these metaphors, what exactly are they telling us about God? They say something rightfully fits and yet – it can’t be the way they fit for a human person. St. Augustine makes this point clear when analyzing the words of a critic of the way God is presented in the Old Testament:

God does not repent as a human being does, but as God. So too, he is not angry as a human being is or merciful as a human being is or jealous as a human being is, but does all things as God. God’s repentance does not follow upon a mistake, and the wrath of God does not include the agitation of a mind in turmoil. The mercy of God does not involve the unhappiness of heart of one who is compassionate, as the Latin etymology would have it, and the jealousy of God does not imply a mind full of spite. Rather, God’s repentance is what we call the humanly unexpected change of those things that lie in his power. The wrath of God is the punishment of sin; the mercy of God is his goodness in providing help. The jealousy of God is his providence in accord with which he does not allow his subjects to love without penalty what he forbids. […] And human beings judge these things by human standards; scarcely a few spiritual persons understand them, as they should be understood of God. For this reason, when the holy scripture speaks of the Ineffable, it most providentially descends to certain words that seem absurd and unworthy, even to human beings and carnal ones at that, for speaking of God.[3]

Scripture often presents history as it appears to the people involved with it; thus, if God seems to change his way, it seems as if he repents. His eternal decision has not changed: his eternal act is one and the same. What changed is the human condition. This is exactly how we are to understand the book of Jonah. It tells us that God’s universal act will condemn us for our sins, but will save us if we repent and follow him. What God does to and with us changes according to what we do, but God does not change. We can understand God with metaphors, but we must appreciate that such metaphor must not be pushed too far, because if we do, a monster is made out of God and heresy is the result.

[1] To determine this one should see how people from other religious traditions comment on their own scriptural texts.

[2] All one has to do is read the text of the early heretics, and this is a common feature of their writings. Those who opposed them had to go into more depth in explaining Scriptural passages than the heretic, showing the true depth required in interpreting a text. However, because of the simplicity of the heretic, it is also obvious why they attracted followers. People want such simplicity, they seek it, though the truth is rarely so simple, no matter what Occam says.

[3] St. Augustine, “Answer to an Enemy of the Law and the Prophets” in Arianism and Other Heresies. Trans. Roland J. Teske, S.J. (Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 1995), 384-5.

Bible

Henry Karlson

Heresy

Previous Post

February 29, 2012

Dogmatism at the Journal of Medical Ethics

Next Post

February 29, 2012 "Ashes in a Flash"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your ____.

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mind Actions Spirit Heart