Santorum is the one with the “phony theology”

Last updated on: February 21, 2012 at 5:22 pm by Morning's Minion

Santorum is the one with the “phony theology” 2012-02-21T17:22:15-05:00 Morning's Minion

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A lot of people are piling on Rick Santorum for his inopportune comments about Obama’s supposed “phony theology”. But most of these critics are missing something fundamental. They assume, albeit implicitly, that Santorum is speaking from the perspective of orthodox Catholic theology, and then denounce him for seeking to impose his theological views on a secular state. But this misses the point entirely. Santorum’s theology is most certainly not an orthodox Catholic position. His worldview owes far more to American evangelicalism and exceptionalism than historic Christianity. It is no accident that Santorum’s core support comes from right-wing evangelicals.

For me, the kicker was when Santorum stated that Obama’s theology was “not based on the bible”. This, right here, is the defining Protestant sola scriptura position, where the bible is the sole source of Christians belief. Catholics don’t talk that way, and they certainly don’t think that way. Catholics believe that revelation comes from scripture and tradition. Specifically, the Church teaches that the union of sacred tradition and sacred scripture together form a “single sacred deposit of the word of God” (Dei Verbum). The deposit of faith contains the memory of Jesus, and everything that goes with it, and preserving this memory is entrusted to the Church.

This system of belief is the backbone of the Catholic faith and the key source of disagreement during the Protestant reformation. Protestants and Muslims both see themselves as “people of the book”. Not so for Catholics. We do not treat the library of writings, which are compiled as the Bible, in this way. We insist that in a primary sense, Jesus the person is God’s Word. The collection of writings labeled the Bible is the Word of God only in a secondary sense, insofar as when rightly interpreted it enables us to get to know Jesus. The true Word of God has a human face.

Rick Santorum, therefore, is talking and thinking more like an American Protestant than a global Catholic. It is no accident that Santorum was talking about environmental theology – there is no clearer example of how his thinking diverges from the Church’s thinking. Worst things first – Santorum slams the overwhelming scientific consensus on man-made global warming. He calls it a fake, and claims that God gave the planet to mankind “for our benefit not for the Earth’s benefit”.

I believe Santorum is influenced here by a number of Protestant-inspired “phony theologies”:

First, Gnosticism – the metaphysical dualism that sees the world and all of creation as evil, from which the soul seeks liberation. If creation is not fundamentally good and in need of renewal, then why should be it not exploited through violence and environmental degradation? Christians, on the other hand, believe in the essential goodness of all creation.
Second, a Calvinist-inspired American exceptionalism – the belief that the United States of America is especially chosen by God, and whose residents are granted a divine mandate to use its resources as they see fit.
Third, voluntaristic anti-intellectualism, in mocking and dismissing an overwhelming scientific consensus. Catholics have always believed in a certain intelligibility to creation, meaning that faith and reason cannot be separated. Santorum is ripping them apart.

Ironically, while Santorum parades himself as the shining knight of “conservatism”, his position on the environment tells us something different. True conservatism is about prudence and temperance, about the cultivation of virtues in all aspects of life. But Santorum, like so many American liberals of the right, takes this approach when it comes to human sexuality, but tosses it out the window when it comes to economic and social activity. On the environment, like so many on the American right, Santorum adopts an almost Saruman-esque approach of plunder for immediate gratification, far removed from real conservative notions of stewardship.

It is also far removed from the thinking of Pope Benedict XVI, who addresses head-on the “threats arising from the neglect – if not downright misuse – of the earth and the natural goods that God has given us”.

Pope Benedict uses the bible – Santorum’s principal point of reference – to make his point. Biblical revelation tells us that the earth is a gift of the Creator. The response to such a gift is to care for and cultivate creation, to become God’s co-worker. The sin at the origin of the human race broke the harmony between the Creator, mankind and the created world. As Benedict puts it: “Human beings let themselves be mastered by selfishness; they misunderstood the meaning of God’s command and exploited creation out of a desire to exercise absolute domination over it. But the true meaning of God’s original command, as the Book of Genesis clearly shows, was not a simple conferral of authority, but rather a summons to responsibility”. Santorum’s theology seems to embrace this phony notion of absolute dominion.

Santorum also seems to eschew all notions of solidarity. On the other hand, Pope Benedict reiterates the well-established Church teaching that “God has destined the earth and everything it contains for all peoples and nations”, that the goods of creation belong to humanity as a whole. And here, he is quite blunt: “Large numbers of people in different countries and areas of our planet are experiencing increased hardship because of the negligence or refusal of many others to exercise responsible stewardship over the environment..the current pace of environmental exploitation is seriously endangering the supply of certain natural resources not only for the present generation, but above all for generations yet to come”.

Here, the pope is on solid ground. Despite Santorum’s convenient denialism, global warming is not just a theory or an imagined future. It is real, and it is hitting the poorest countries hardest. Africa is already suffering from desertification, water shortages, drought, low crop yields, flooding in fastly-urbanizing cities, water stress in river basins, increased disease, a decline in fisheries, and increasing population displacement. Low-lying regions are prone to extreme flooding, and the existence of some low-lying islands is even in question.

In addressing remedies, the pope explicitly condemns the “pursuit of myopic economic interests”. Noting that “the ecological crisis shows the urgency of a solidarity which embraces time and space”, he calls for richer countries to embrace “more sober lifestyles, while reducing their energy consumption and improving its efficiency”. What’s more, we need to think not only about our individual choices, but also about our economic system as a whole: “Prudence would thus dictate a profound, long-term review of our model of development, one which would take into consideration the meaning of the economy and its goals with an eye to correcting its malfunctions and misapplications”.

It should be clear from this perspective that Santorum’s environmental theology is the real phony theology. The Catholic position on the environment runs straight into Santorum’s American exceptionalism and narrow nationalism. It runs straight into his materialism and consumerism, hallmarks of liberalism, right or left. As for Santorum’s invective against global warming, he again rebukes the pope, who has called for urgent action to reach an international agreement to halt global warming. Despite the pope’s call for greater solidarity across the globe, Santorum’s theology remains a theology of the USA.

Fundamentally, this is a moral issue. As Pope Benedict puts it, “our duties towards the environment flow from our duties towards the person, considered both individually and in relation to others”. Environmental ecology is thus intricately related to human ecology. It is entirely inconsistent to respect sexuality while taking a hedonistic approach to the exploitation of nature, and vice versa. “The book of nature is one and indivisible,” says the pope. But Santorum seeks not only to divide the book of nature, but to violently rip it apart. Is it any wonder that his theology can be twisted into disrespecting immigrants and the poor, supporting torture, and promising war and destruction on his country’s enemies?

I will end with how Pope Benedict ends his environmental message: *“*If you want to cultivate peace, protect creation”. There’s a lesson for Santorum in there somewhere. A true theological lesson.

Previous Post

February 20, 2012

Not-So-Strange Bedfellows

Next Post

February 22, 2012 Fasting for Vitality

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who became David's closest friend, even though he was Saul's son?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Shimei Abner Jonathan Ish-bosheth