Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
A Study Of “On The Character of Men And the Virtuous Life”: Part XLII.

A Study Of “On The Character of Men And the Virtuous Life”: Part XLII.

Last updated on: December 19, 2011 at 8:08 am by Henry Karlson

A Study Of “On The Character of Men And the Virtuous Life”: Part XLII. 2011-12-19T08:08:46-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Introduction and Part II

“People with filthy clothes soil the coats of those who rub against them. Likewise, the immoral and the wicked, when they come into contact with the simple-minded and speak to them about evil, defile such people’s souls through their talk.”[1]

Desire is the foundation for sin and leads to its destruction.[2] “The beginning of salvation and of the heavenly kingdom for the soul is love.”[3]

The idle soul is just like copper which is left unused: it is blemished before it deteriorates. [4] “By her evil actions she deprives herself of God’s protection; and just as copper is rotted away by verdigris, so is she rotted away by the evil that idleness produces in the material body, and she becomes ugly, unserviceable and incapable of attaining salvation.”[5]

While we are alive, we must keep active. Activity indicates life. The same is true with the soul. Spiritual activity indicates a lively soul; spiritual inactivity, spiritual neglect, hinders its proper advancement and slowly makes the person blind to the spiritual reality around them. Such blindness does not just affect their spiritual life, but their daily life as well. They will not be properly grounded to the world, and so they will not understand the interdependent relationships of the world, relationships which have a spiritual element behind them. Morality is converted from a morality of love which gives meaning and value to morality to a morality of the letter which loses all meaning, and so, eventually will become something easily dispensed. This is exactly what we see in the world: those who have followed some worldly-accepted goal, such as the accumulation of wealth, are able to convince others to follow their example, even if it means undermining traditional moral claims. They are able to show their success and they will consistently use it as proof that their way is superior. Anyone who questions their behavior are merely envious of their success and not willing to do what it takes to be a success themselves; that is, their critics not only are envious, but they are lazy as well. And yet, on a spiritual level, they are the ones who have proven lazy, and so they do not see the full, real picture.

We must all struggle daily, we must all work out our own salvation with fear and trembling (Philip. 2:12). The foundation of that struggle is love. What love allows, that we can do. But if we see someone we loved suffering and we could do something for them, we would. Love, when it is put into practice, becomes universal and knows no partiality, and so the common good is promoted. As Mo Tzu points out, the suffering in the world is in part created due to this lack of universal love:

When we inquire into the cause of these various harms, what do we find has produced them? Do they come about from loving others and trying to benefit them? Surely not! They came rather from hating others and trying to injure them. And when we set out to classify and describe those men who hate and injure others, shall we say that their actions are motivated by universality or partiality? Surely we must answer, by partiality, and it is this partiality in their dealings with one another that gives rise to all the great harms in the world.[6]

Love gives of the self, while inordinate desire seeks to take to the self. The two provide two different ways in which we can live. The path of love opens up the self and so allows the grace of God enter into the soul and transform it so that the person who follows the path of love will show themselves in the image and likeness of the God who is love. Desire, on the other hand, closes off the world, objectifying the world at large and seeking to take a part of it and keep it to oneself for the benefit of the self alone. The self grows, weighing the soul down, keeping it shackled by the objects the self has grasped and taken as its own. The soul slowly perishes, and with it, the chance for the acting person to find the happiness and joy they seek; what they take for themselves through desire does not lead to everlasting happiness, but only a limited joy which, when it ends, leaves the person empty inside. They will then have the choice to abandon their desire and perhaps free the soul, or they can think they only need more of what they desire for their desire to be satisfied – the second path, of course, leading to greater imprisonment of the soul and greatest dissatisfaction when the temporary joy of attainment is gone.

To overcome the defilement of inordinate desire, we must therefore strive to follow God, loving him and our neighbor as ourselves. Love helps us overcome craving – and when we do, we will see the sorrows we have generated by acting out on our desires also vanish:

But whosoever in the world
Overcomes this childish craving, hard to get beyond,
From him, sorrows fall away,
Like drops of water from a lotus leaf.[7]

Love leads to the good, which is why it is the foundation for all morality. Love of God directs us to follow him in his goodness, which leads us to love our neighbor because God loves them. But we love them in and through God, we see them as good from good, so that in loving them, we show honor and love to God – this is why there is no discord between the commandments to love God and neighbor, for they are two aspects of the one love we are to follow. “For you could not love God unless you also loved your neighbour, because God cannot be loved with envy and hatred; yet, because in other things you were able to do this, that you wish something and not wish it with reference to your neighbour, it is clear that you understand that you must do both, although indeed you cannot do one without the other.”[8]

Those who do not follow the path of love, but only the path of desire, often lead others to follow the path of desire: they teach that one gets all one gets by oneself for oneself. They take out of the world what they desire, limiting its accessibility, causing those who do not understand the path of love to see and believe they must act the same in order to make sure they gain what they desire before it is too late. They make people afraid – they too must seek after what they want now, and the world at large slowly but surely gets eaten away by the great consumption which follows.

We have already seen the analogy of verdigris with copper to evil and the soul. Our author is repeating the theme, but now doing so in a way to encourage the reader to act so that they do not let spiritual verdigris affect their soul. The suggestion that salvation is had through love is certainly something which resonates with the Anthony of the Sayings, where Anthony is said to have no fear because he has acquired love for God.[9] It is also such a statement which also gives this text a Christian overtone – for it is such an agape that distanced the Christian from other, wise sages of the Hellenistic world. The ascetic theme of this passage is, without surprise, one which also resonates with Anthony. He also, in the Sayings, There is nothing in our text which would make us doubt an Anthonite connection.

[1] “On the Character of Men and on the Virtuous Life,” 351 (#147).

[2] “On the Character of Men and on the Virtuous Life,” 351 (#148).

[3] “On the Character of Men and on the Virtuous Life,” 351 (#148).

[4] “On the Character of Men and on the Virtuous Life,” 351 (#149).

[5] “On the Character of Men and on the Virtuous Life,” 351-2 (#149).

[6] Mo Tzu, Basic Writings. Trans. Burton Watson (New York: Columbia University Press, 1963), 39.

[7] The Dhammapada. Trans. John Ross Carter and Mahinda Palihawadana. Ed. Jaroslav Pelikan (New York: Book of the Month Club, 1992), 69.

[8] Hugh of Saint Victor, On the Sacraments of the Christian Faith, 381.

[9] See The Sayings of the Desert Fathers, 8 (#32).

Previous Post

December 16, 2011

Pleasantly Surprised

Next Post

December 19, 2011 "Responsibility to the Order of Being"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the first high priest of Israel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Levi Aaron Joshua Moses