Called To Inquire: The Value of PKD’s Exegesis

Last updated on: December 15, 2011 at 8:55 am by Henry Karlson

Called To Inquire: The Value of PKD’s Exegesis 2011-12-15T08:55:23-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the last entry of the Exegesis, Philip K. Dick is suggesting his work has come to an end. He has become a whole person. He now believes that a higher, unfallen aspect of himself has been helping direct his fallen, incarnated self and now that he has discerned this, the two can come together and form one whole person:

What I realized is: true existence requires experience of both Yang and Yin: I saw them as two rings, a bright one of light (Yang) and a darker one of Yin. But the latter still real and necessary. […] What was experienced last night in my vision of the dark – or darker ring – or circle – of Yin is that, as Ted Sturgeon speaks of, you voluntarily incarnate (e.g., as I did in 1928 as PKD) to deliberatively experience Yin: creatoreal, irrational existence here (as bodhisattva) in order to know and be Yin. The Yang side is the bright unfallen side in and salvador salvandus, one’s other – rational – self, who enters in order to rescue the Yin or limited or darkened, incarnated self. This is why the inbreaking of the Yang side (2-3-74) is anamnesis: recovered memory of one’s own lost true self. This is also an extricating yourself from the maze by first being outside the maze – i.e., having solved it. Otherwise, fruitless horizontal tracking goes on forever; once (voluntarily) incarnated you are stuck there (here) forever. So I am a unitary whole now, with one part as a direct antecedent from the upper realm (Thomas) and one (PKD) from the lower realm.[1]

If PKD had not said similar things before, this would be a very haunting entry, suggesting that PKD had indeed gained some sort of insight, that he had finally knew how to get out of the maze of life and, having come to know this, he exited life as proof of his discovery. But one who reads the whole Exegesis suspects that, if he had not passed out due to a stroke, he would quickly find a new avenue of exploration, a new way of trying to understand his life in relation to his 2-3-74 experience, and this “aha” moment would be just one of a series of such moments written down by PKD.

It is very difficult to properly describe, let alone explain, the significance of PKD’s Exegesis. On one level, it can be read as the babbling of someone who lost his sanity in the 1970s. I am sure many will read it this way – though, as the brief commentary in the book points out, one of the things which makes this a problematic reading of the text is PKD’s own questioning of his sanity, an action which someone who is insane would not do. Something seemed to happen to him on 2-3-74, and those around him experienced some of the oddity itself. He came to know things he should not have known, such as his son’s inguinal hernia, which suggest some level of authenticity for his experiences. But, since he had to decode those experiences, since he had to interpret them and try to find out how they would fit in with known scientific, philosophical and theological theories, his work is best to be read as several attempted explanations or exegeses, with some which are quite credible, and some which seem to be pure bunk. We are shown his thought processes, we see the sources he chooses as tools to help interpret his experiences, and, if we decide to engage the text, we end up agreeing with some of his thoughts while utterly dismissing others as absurd. There is no way one can accept everything which PKD ponders – not even PKD himself does so. The value, however, is in the exploration of ideas, to uncover the diamonds in the rough contained within the long, meandering text.

Even when he hits on ideas which seem crazy, as perhaps this last entry, if we look deeper at it, if we engage it, we can see behind it ideas which are not really so crazy, and indeed, hint at ideas which even the long-standing orthodox Christian community accepts but has difficulty in expressing. We know the original intention for every human person, as they are created by God, differs from what a person makes of themselves; the two diverge as if two different persons, though salvation is the process by which the fallen person finds themselves restored to their unfallen state through the healing grace of God. As for the deliberate decision to incarnate in a fallen manner, Sergius Bulgakov sees original sin in a way similar to PKD’s explanation:

This idea must be liked with the more general idea (see above) that man himself participates, in a certain sense, in his own origin, accepting his being from the Creator. And this acceptance is characterized not by monotonous sameness but by the individual qualifiedness of self-determination. Every person pre-enacts Adam’s fall (with differences in mode and intensity). Every person repeats this fall, as it were, by his agreement to enter into a world damaged by Adam’s sin, thus accepting the infirm human nature, the sick flesh that already bears the seeds of death. This acceptance becomes equivalent here to the acceptance of being in general, for after Adam’s fall there is no other world, no world without sin.[2]

The fall is a choice to be in the world, and thus, an acceptance of the world as it is; PKD helps give an explanation for the good behind why we do this, even if in doing so, we would end up contaminated by sin: compassion. We go into the world, get contaminated for it, but yet we find a sense of loyalty to and for the world, and we enter as “bodhisattvas” to make it better, even if we know by doing so we will sink down in its mire. God, of course, is necessary for this to work – we need him to lift us up if we are to help save the world – but, in the incarnation, and the cosmic work of the incarnation as suggested by Scripture, God is shown to approve the task and transform it into his own even as he heals us from the consequences of abandoning him for the sake of the world.[3]

When not in the midst of self-doubt, PKD demonstrates a great sense of mission – that there is some great narrative being explained by his major novels, with his Exegesis in a way becoming the key by which we are to understand them and see how they explain our world situation and the way we are to get out of it. The fallen powers – whatever they are – are onto him, and try to subvert his work. Blade Runner is a case in point; while he was fascinated with what he saw of the movie, he also saw how the film, in its own contours, changed his vision; the movie studios tried to get him to write a novelization of the film and to take out of circulation the novel the movie was based upon; if he had done so, the powers that be would have succeeded in subverting his message, but because he held out against this, Blade Runner would point people to the original and from there, they would get the message that the movie tried to blot out:

My god, this movie is the greatest defeat (what was done to the book) and victory (the Tagore kerygma promulgated); the first is ostensible, the latter cryptic. Oddly, the first appears ostensibly to be a victory but really is a defeat; nonetheless, a real victory lucks secretly under it, but it is not the victory that people will think the making of a movie from my book is.[4]

The world tempts us to follow its ways; if you get a book made into a movie, an author is to feel as if there work is a success, even if the movie radically departs from the book’s vision. PKD, however, was adamant that he would keep his original book pure – while appreciating the movie for what it was. The book explores the dangers of the artificial, and gives a semblance of a hell-like world, a black iron prison, the kind of world we need to be liberated from. The movie, however, glorifies that prison – by making Deckard a replicant, the whole story and message is turned upside-down.

There are many twists and turns in PKD’s Exegesis. There is the question of who or what contacted him; at times, he got the sense of a person (Thomas) engaging him, indeed, merging with him – who is that person? Thomas appears to be from the first century, a Christian; is it reincarnation? It is contact with someone who is dead? Someone in another universe? Each time PKD answers these questions differently, his vision changes. Did the early Christians have a sense of “time travel,” and work through the chains of DNA to engage such travel? Was this the means Thomas used to interact with him (PKD saw that if one put fish signs together, they could merge to resemble the double-helix of DNA)? Sometimes, it is clear, PKD is thinking these answers out as a way an author tries to figure out what is going on in his story, and so, it is not surprising he tosses aside answers which he himself finds unconvincing, soon after he makes them. Even when we see many such crazy answers in the work, the book is valuable because it shows that we should risk asking questions, we should risk exploring ideas which we might think are unfounded to see where they lead, because this is the kind of work we need to do if we want to come to any form of understanding of our place in the world. It shows the willingness we need to explore every notion, every idea, and the brutal honesty we need to have as we do so; for in the process, even if the initial notions are unsound, we can stumble upon some great insight, one which makes the process itself worthy of human dignity. If we can lean on his example and use it to justify our own thought experiments, we have gained much and his work is indeed a success.

[1] Philip K. Dick, Exegesis. ed. Pamela Jackson and Jonathan Lethem (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2011), 894-5.

[2] Sergius Bulgakov, The Bride of the Lamb. Trans. Boris Jakim (Grand Rapids, MI: William B Eerdman’s Publishing Company, 2002), 184. “The relation of the human spirit to its nature, which is one for all humankind, is established in him. For all humankind, all of Adam’s descendants, there is now no choice between the world in the state before Adam’s fall and the state after it. For his descendants the only choice is to be or not to be in this world, which is in a state that should not be; but this acceptance of being, this to be, includes an infinite number of individual self-determinations and gradations. This self-determination takes place not in time, as it did for Adam and Eve, but above time; however, it is directed at time and is, as it were, simultaneous with Adam, as in Adam,” ibid., 185.

[3] “Premise: the primordial Fall was caused by our – by us, not our ancestors – making the error of taking the spatiotemporal realm to be real,” Philip K. Dick, Exegesis, 624.

[4] Ibid., 825.

Books

Henry Karlson

PKD

Previous Post

December 14, 2011

True Deterrence Lies In The Path of Life, Not The Arms of Death

Next Post

December 15, 2011 US responsibility to Mexico

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city was the Apostle Paul imprisoned in for two years?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ephesus Corinth Rome Jerusalem