Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
A Study Of “On The Character of Men And the Virtuous Life”: Part XXV.

A Study Of “On The Character of Men And the Virtuous Life”: Part XXV.

Last updated on: August 8, 2011 at 9:28 am by Henry Karlson

A Study Of “On The Character of Men And the Virtuous Life”: Part XXV. 2011-08-08T09:28:13-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Introduction and Part II

God is good, man wicked. There is no evil in heaven, and no goodness on earth. Therefore the intelligent man chooses the better part and acknowledges the God of all; he thanks and praises God, and before death he hates the body; and he does not allow his evil senses to carry out their desires, for he knows their destructiveness and their strength.[1]

“The wicked man delights in excess while he despises justice.”[2] A wicked person ignores the short span of life, and does not heed the uncertainty which lies before them.[3] Death cannot be stopped due to bribery.[4] “And if an old man is shameless and stupid, he is like rotten wood and no use for anything.” [5]

Our sense of pleasure is in part subjective; we get more pleasure out of an action if we have suffered its contrary affliction.[6] “One does not drink with pleasure unless one is thirsty, nor eat with pleasure unless hungry, nor sleep soundly unless very drowsy, nor feel joy without grief beforehand.”[7] In this manner, we will only be able to enjoy “eternal blessings” if we first “despise transient things.”[8]

If God created the world and saw it was good, why are we now being told that we are to hate the world because it is evil? Clearly, context is important. While there is a common theme which bring these paragraphs together to allow us to comment upon them here, we must remember the greater context in which they are found so as to prevent us from looking at these passages as dualistic and heretical. Though they might actually be thoughts stemming from a dualistic source, as we bring them together into the document as a whole, they become something else: they represent the use of exaggeration for the sake of a rhetorical argument, a kind of exaggeration we find in the Gospels: “”If any one comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple. Whoever does not bear his own cross and come after me, cannot be my disciple” (Lk. 14:26-27 RSV).

We see Jesus telling us to hate everything, from our families to our own lives, in order to be his disciples. We must be careful and understand what exactly he means. We are not expected to literally hate anyone; we know this because he has told us many times that we are to love others, even our enemies, and we are to do good for those who would persecute us. We are, however, to hate attachments which get in our way, which prevent us from following God. We are to overcome attachments, to overcome anything which would block us from following God. If our parents, spouses or children want us to do something which conflicts with the path God has put before us, we must deny their request and follow God. To some, it might appear we no longer love them, even that we hate them, when we turn them down. So many of the saints discovered this in their lives, where they were accused of being ungrateful of their parents for disobeying their unreasonable requests.

It is an undue attachment to the world which destroys our relationship with God and with each other, and it is such an undue attachment which prevents us from moving in in our spiritual journey and making ourselves ready for eternity. Jesus, we are told, promoted a transformed relationship with the world, telling us that everything which does not have a love for God as its base must be abandoned. Thus, we find in Matthew, Jesus’ demands upon us comes to us without the exaggeration found in Luke: “He who loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and he who loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; and he who does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me” (Matt. 10:37-38 RSV). It is an issue of the proper ordering of our love, and allowing God and our love of God be the source of our interaction with the world, instead of allowing our interaction with the world as being the foundation for our interaction with God.

Everything which we find ourselves attached, which we try to hold on to separate from their place in God, becomes an idol. Our body, for example, is one such idol. These idols are, of course, the false perceptions which we use to override the real, and it is such false perceptions which must be detested and overcome. Our attachments make us suffer as what we expect from them does not happen. The process of detachment, however, can also be painful, but this pain is kind of pain we find in the process of healing. Once one has finally detached themselves from their idolized self, and have opened themselves fully to God, the pain is transformed to joy and happiness, and indeed, the process of detachment itself will be looked upon as the means by which one was able to find and experience beatitude. With free will, we have abandoned God, and have attempted to become gods in this world, to create a world of illusion based upon the projection of our thoughts unto the world itself. This world, this false world, is what must be hated and rejected, because it is fundamentally unreal and seeks to corrupt and destroy what is real. This is why this kind of world is said to be evil. It doesn’t exist, and it seeks to pull the world into its non-existence, to destroy what is real and true.

Our perceptions, as long as they are mixed with our attachments to a falsely-constructed worldview, will try to reify that false world. They will help find ways we can experience limited, transient pleasures which seem to confirm the value of our attachments, but, because they are leading us away further and further into attachments with that which does not exist, they will continue to lead us further and further away from God and more and more into that unreality itself, a situation which will not bring the pleasures we seek, but more and more disaster and ruin. One day we will die, and the idolatrous world the self tries to create will come crashing down if it has not already been eliminated before our death. If we have not detached ourselves from it, if we have not formed a proper relationship with God, who is the eternal source and foundation of all that is real, then at death we will be shown to be rotten to the core, like a piece of drift wood eaten up by insects. There might be the semblance of a person left, but there will be no true life within.

Thus, we are to see every attachment which leads us astray as something hateful. Our love for God must level every falsehood:

If you truly love God and long to reach the kingdom that is to come, if you are truly pained by your failings and are mindful of punishment and of the eternal judgment, if you are truly afraid to die, then it will not be possible to have an attachment, or anxiety, or concern for money, for possessions, for family relationships, for worldly glory, for love and brotherhood, indeed for anything of earth. All worry about one’s condition, even for one’s body, will be pushed aside as hateful.[9]

It is not the person, place or thing which gets in our way, but our improper attitude toward them which must be despised. We often confuse the two, and this is why language can be employed which seems to suggest a rejection of some person or thing; but it is not a real rejection of them, but the false person or thing we have created in our mind and attributed to be them. They come back alive, in their true self, in God when we have found God, and it is why we love our neighbor in and through our love for God.

Even those who have yet attained the fullness of selflessness should be able to see and understand why detachment is necessary, because it can lead to the happiness which they seek. They should be able to see how their current concepts and attachments lead only to suffering and so they should seek to move beyond them, and indeed, to be concerned about their spiritual life because their spiritual condition will establish their own happiness and sorrow:

A man who has own best interests at heart will therefore be especially concerned for his soul and will spare no pains to keep it stainless and true to itself. If his body is wasted by hunger or by its struggles with head and cold, if it is afflicted by illness or suffers violence from anyone, he will make small account of it, and, echoing the words of Paul, he will say in each of his adversities: ‘but though our outward man is corrupted, yet the inward man is renewed day by day.’[10]

In the material world, we project all kinds of systematic constructs which we try to use as a means of controlling and manipulating the world at large. They can be useful, and they can work for a time, but they cannot last. This is especially true in relation to economic concerns. Money, and all that is involved with it, has some value to it, but it disguises that value by making it appear as if it is more than it actually is, as if it is something of eternal value. The world of illusion loves it because it uses a truth to hide the bitter reality behind that truth. But that illusion ends when our life ends. Death might be postponed, and money might help pay for medicine which will postpone death, but in the end, death will get us all. One should learn this and see through the monetary system long before one dies, so that one will not consider money and its accumulation as the goal of life. Money which gets in the way of right relationships, which gets in the way of the universal distribution of goods, will ultimately demand more and more sacrifices of its subjects until, at last, there are no sacrifices left and the idol will no longer be able to help anyone as it is toppled down. Since so many depend upon that idol and live off its benefits, its toppling creates widespread devastation, leading to the ruin of so many people. However, such a time is also a time of opportunity, where real relationships and the universal distribution of goods can be better realized, if people realize the error of their ways and avoid the pitfalls of the past. But those who are attached to their ways find themselves wanting an excess of inordinate pleasures, the excess of which leads to the halting of the universal destination of goods and prevents justice from reigning in society. When the world markets are run by greed and not justice, then the excess accumulation of money involved with greed will be the ultimate undoing of the one who follows its ways. Needless to say, if we suffer here as a result of such injustice, it is only for a time, where we will find eternity with its blessings capable of turning our sorrow into joy, and indeed, allowing us to appreciate even more the joy of eternity because we have seen and understood real suffering. Indeed, it is in part our reaction to such suffering that we prove to ourselves and to God where we stand in relation to God: “To accept every affliction as God’s will is the very embodiment of piety, for true love is tested by hostile forces.” [11]

These passages appear to be dualistic and their dualism might make us question whether an orthodox source would write them down. However, as was said above, we must not take these passages out of the context of the whole document itself in order to establish a pretext. They can be read in an orthodox manner, if they are read as rhetorical flourishes which employ exaggeration to make their point. In relation to God, everything falls short. It is very common for monks to heighten this failing of creation, to point to the evils within creation as a reminder of why we should not be attached to it and why we must make God our aim. It is not to say that God created an evil world, but that the world is experienced as evil as a result of sin. And, without surprise, Anthony was known to tell his listeners to put Christ, and the following of Christ, before all things. Thus, Athanasius wrote:

And He gave grace to Antony in speaking, so that he consoled many that were sorrowful, and set those at variance at one, exhorting all to prefer the love of Christ before all that is in the world. And while he exhorted and advised them to remember the good things to come, and the loving-kindness of God towards us, ‘Who spared not His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all’ he persuaded many to embrace the solitary life.[12]

The message in our root text, though exaggerated, is the kind of message one would give to tell people to abandon the world and all that is in it for the sake of God. We see a reminder of the good things to come to those who follow God, and we see this being used as a cause for the reader to detach themselves from the things of the world. And, just like these passages, Anthony was known to teach people to despise the body for the benefit of their soul:

And he used to say that it behoved a man to give all his time to his soul rather than his body, yet to grant a short space to the body through its necessities; but all the more earnestly to give up the whole remainder to the soul and seek its profit, that it might not be dragged down by the pleasures of the body, but, on the contrary, the body might be in subjection to the soul.[13]

We can see in these passages the kinds of statements which Anthony would have used in order to make this point. We see something similar in Anthony’s letters. In them, he uses the frailty of bodily, material nature and counters it with the eternal nature of the spirit. He wants his audience to know his love for them is not fickle, not “bodily, but transcendent, spiritual: “I want you to know that the love that is between me and you is no bodily love, but a spiritual, religious love. For bodily friendship has no firmness or stability, being moved by strange winds.”[14]

In this way, while we might be surprised with the kind of extreme rhetoric in these paragraphs, when looked within the context of the whole, and when looked within the context of what we know of Anthony’s relativizing of the body for the sake of the spirit, these passages look authentic. They show the sentiment Athanasius said Anthony held. And we should not use the extremity of the rhetoric to dismiss their authenticity, after all, Jesus is shown to use similar rhetoric, and it is likely Jesus’ employment of it would allow Anthony to do so as well.

[1] “On the Character of Men and on the Virtuous Life,” 345 (#102).

[2] “On the Character of Men and on the Virtuous Life,” 345(#103).

[3] “On the Character of Men and on the Virtuous Life,” 345 (#103).

[4] “On the Character of Men and on the Virtuous Life,” 345 (#103).

[5] “On the Character of Men and on the Virtuous Life,” 345 (#103).

[6] “On the Character of Men and on the Virtuous Life,” 345 (#104).

[7] “On the Character of Men and on the Virtuous Life,” 345 (#104).

[8] “On the Character of Men and on the Virtuous Life,” 345 (#104).

[9] St. John Climacus, The Ladder of Divine Ascent. Trans. Colm Luibheid and Norman Russell (New York: Paulist Press, 1982), 81.

[10] St Basil the Great, “On Detachment,” in Saint Basil: Ascetic Works. trans. Sister M. Monica Wagner, C.S.C. (New York: Fathers of the Church, Inc., 1950), 495.

[11] Mark the Monk, “On the Spiritual Law” in Counsels on the Spiritual Life. Trans. Tom Vivian and Augustine Casiday (Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2009), 98.

[12] Athanasius, Life of Antony, 200.

[13] Ibid, 208.

[14] Chitty, Letters of Saint Antony, 12 [Letter IV].

Previous Post

August 8, 2011

Certainty. Uncertainty? Love!

Next Post

August 8, 2011 Republicans and communists

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Ebenezer" mean, as in the stone Samuel set up?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Stone of David Stone of help Stone of God Stone of Law