The Peculiar Logic of Robbie George

Last updated on: June 30, 2011 at 11:23 am by Morning's Minion

The Peculiar Logic of Robbie George 2011-06-30T11:23:56-05:00 Morning's Minion

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Robbie George has weighed in on gay marriage in general, and gay marriage in New York in particular. He tries to make a nuanced internally consistent argument, but it doesn’t work. Basically, George blames the “ideology of sexual liberalism”, especially in its 1960s manifestation, for paving the way for same-sex marriage. For, he holds, if you follow this path to its logical conclusion, “the reality that has traditionally been denominated as “marriage” loses all intelligibility.” As a core argument, this has a strong kernel of truth. But I contend it is George himself who does not take the argument to its logical conclusion. Consider this point:

“Devotion to “sexual freedom” had been no part of the liberalism of FDR, George Meaney, Cesar Chavez, Hubert Humphrey, or the leaders and rank-and-file members of the civil-rights movement. Today, however, allegiance to the cause of sexual freedom is the nonnegotiable price of admission to the liberal (or “progressive”) club. It is worth noting that more than a few conservatives have bought into a (more limited) version of it as well, as we see in the debate over redefining marriage”.

This mirrors I point I have made often here, as have others. The Democrats ceased being the party of the worker and the middle class, and instead became the party of more elitist interests – interests based on the core ethic of individual rights. But George misses something profound. In tracing the developing of changing sexual ethics, he misses the connection between sexual individualism and economic individualism. It is no accident that the revolution in sexual ethics in the 1960s pave the way for the revolution in economic ethics in the 1980s. It has the same philosophical foundation – downplaying the notion of a harmonic social order in favor of the supremacy of individual freedom. The satisfaction of individual needs trumps all, and the sole purpose of the social contract is to set boundaries on individual freedom. From this perspective, bringing to sexual ethics what had long been present in economic ethics was quite natural. It was bound to happen. Getting the government out of the bedroom is the same as getting the government out of the wallet.

Catholics, of course, don’t accept this philosophical foundation. They believe in a cohesive social order, where the different parts form a cohesive unity, well-balanced and bound together by solidarity and subsidiarity. From a policy perspective, everything is channeled through the prism of the common good, not individual liberty. And for a few decades after the New Deal, this outlook rose to greater prominence in the United States. There was a feeling of solidarity, an instinctive distrust in the perils of industrial capitalism. It was a stance based on the lost value of prudence, as it acknowledged the real and legitimate attractions of socialism and other forms of social upheaval. This all came to a head in the 1960s, with a younger generation rebelling against what they saw as stultifying conformity (plus some grave injustices such as war and entrenched racism). But they through the baby out with the bathwater. As they strove for social justice, their focus on individual rights paved the way for a return of the cult of the individual, both sexual and economic. Ronald Reagan is as much a child of the 1960s as High Hefner.

But George doesn’t get this for a simple reason – he himself is enthralled by the dogmas of laissez-faire liberalism, in the boardroom if not the bedroom. Just look at his American Principles Project. This is a site that twins “the sanctity of human life and the integrity of marriage and the family” with “economic freedom, limited government, private property and the free market”, completely blind to the discontinuity in these positions and completely oblivious to the disconnect between Catholic social teaching and this flawed philosophical foundation. This philosophy – which the Church refers to as the “poisoned spring” of the “evil individualist spirit” – is just as wrong in the economic spehere as in the sexual sphere. It’s actually sad for a Catholic philosopher of George’s reputation to set up an outfit that simply echoes every awful Republican talking point on economic matters – including the truly insane, unfair, imprudent, and immoral tea party positions. George himself has acted as a court theologian to Glenn Beck, a man whose views on Catholic social teaching are well-known and scandalous. Is it really any surprise that some of the biggest backers of the gay marriage initiative in New York are Wall Street firms? This clear connection seems lost on George.

Let me now tackle another core problem with George’s narrative. He says the following:

“Once one buys into the ideology of sexual liberalism, the reality that has traditionally been denominated as “marriage” loses all intelligibility…As a result, to the extent that one is in the grip of sexual-liberationist ideology, one will find no reason of moral principle why people oughtn’t to engage in sexual relations prior to marriage, cohabit in non-marital sexual partnerships, form same-sex sexual partnerships, or confine their sexual partnerships to two persons, rather than three or more in polyamorous sexual ensembles.”

As before, there is some truth to this. But George has another huge blind spot. He ties it to New York being a “socially liberal state” , where its leading political leaders – Cuomo and Bloomberg – “openly cohabit with women with whom they are not married”. He sees them as an urbane, sophisticated, elite that look down their noses at the less enlightened unwashed masses. This, of course, is a dominant theme in current American politics on the right. It serves as a useful ruse to disguise the upward distribution of income toward the real elites – those with the money. Of course, this game wouldn’t work so well if the Democrats didn’t keep playing into their hands…

But the idea that marriage is viewed differently in “socially liberal” and “socially conservative” regions is bogus. Marriage is no longer seen as a social institution, a bedrock of the social order, in any place. It is a not seen as an institution whose primarily function is the bearing and rearing of children (and this function extends beyond the narrow nuclear family). It is certainly not seen as a total self-giving of one man and one woman, bonded for life. Not even close. Instead, it is seen as romantic individual wish-fulfillment, the search for the perfect mate that can satisfy sexually, emotionally, and economically. When every little girl wants to be Princess Kate, you know the institution of marriage has been debauched. It is about the perfectly American “pursuit of happiness”. It is an individual right. If this is what marriage is, then of course it should be open to same-sex couples. Those who oppose the extension of this version of marriage are not protecting traditional marriage at all – they are just highly uncomfortable with homosexuality.

While George focuses on Cuomo and Bloomberg, he misses the point that marriage in the so-called “socially conservative” states is even more debauched. Divorce rates are higher. Out-of-wedlock births are higher. Serial monogamy is the norm. Contraception is ubiquitous. There is nothing “elitist” about the sexual revolution and the re-definition of marriage among individualist lines since the 1960s. There is nothing partisan about it either. And it has nothing to do with the gays, even if George claims that a huge proportion of gay marriages are “sexually open” (if monogamous, does that mean there are OK?). The damage has been done long ago. What George calls “counterfeit” marriage has been with us for some time. Newt Gingrich probably did more to destroy traditional marriage than Andrew Sullivan.

One more point that annoyed me – George’s smug attack on fellow Catholics:

“There are many devout Protestants and even Jews and Muslims whose moral beliefs and practices are far more closely in line with Catholic teachings than Andrew Cuomo’s are. Andrew’s father’s views and policies gave scandal (as Catholics use that term) precisely because people took him to be a serious Catholic.”

Irony is lost on George. His interviewer is Kathyrn Lopez, a known supporter of torture, which is a clear and unambiguous intrinsically and gravely evil act. He himself cavorts with Glenn Beck and holds views on economic issues that (to put it charitably) are not exactly in line with the tenor of Catholic social teaching. And there is no way a Catholic can admire Ayn Rand. Of course, he mirrors Edward “One-Note” Peters here, who is yet again calling for somebody to be denied communion under Canon 915. Yet again, this uniquely American concern wants the Eucharist to be used as a political tool in a selective and partisan fashion. That’s the real scandal.

But if George is off base, how should Catholics respond to the coming acceptance of same-sex marriage? George may carp on about “marriage” not being marriage and he has a point. But then again, what he dubs “conservative” isn’t conservative either. Let’s get past the semantics. As Catholics, we must recognize that the culture does not see marriage as Catholics do, or are supposed to. Same-sex marriage is merely a symptom of this problem, not the problem itself. If we continue to single-out same-sex-marriage, we risk looking hypocritical. Why the years of silence about the culture of serial monogamy, followed by vehement outbursts against same-sex marriage? This is presents a unique opportunity for Catholics to be countercultural – to emphasize how our approach to marriage differs from the dominant cultural norm. Let’s stay positive and let’s stay optimistic.

Previous Post

June 30, 2011

Benedict the Crafty Liberal

Next Post

June 30, 2011 Perverts Love Modesty: A Memoir

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What tax collector wrote a Gospel and was called by Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mark Luke Matthew Barnabas