The Tax of Being Human: A Girardian Guest Post by Greg Mayers

Last updated on: June 14, 2011 at 11:59 pm by voxnovablog

The Tax of Being Human: A Girardian Guest Post by Greg Mayers 2011-06-14T23:59:18-05:00 voxnovablog

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Vox Nova is happy to present this guest post by Father Greg Mayers C.Ss.R. Many of us here at Vox Nova are interested in the work of Rene Girard. Father Mayers gives those unfamiliar with Girard a useful introduction in what follows.

There is a new theory out about how we became human, how the transition happen between a higher primate species and the human species. The theory is not in competition with the theory of evolution, which is a theory of genetics, of material development and which completely ignores the non-material reality of our humanness, or reduces that non-material to a function of the material dimensions of being human. In fact the new theory is a compliment to the theory of evolution we all know under the generalized term of Darwinism, a term vigorously defended or much maligned depending on one’s ideological stance. The new complimentary theory is called the Mimetic Theory, which is most closely associated with the work of Rene Girard, professor emeritus of Stanford University and his collaborators.

First a word about theory. The common misunderstanding about the word theory is that it means simply one’s opinion on a matter that has no evidence. This is the popular understanding and is used as a way to dismissed inconvenient facts, observations and effects. In other words, the word “theory” is meant as a reduction to mere personal preference and of no significance in the public sphere. In fact, within the scientific community, a theorem or theory is an assumption or principle that does explain or illuminate one or many observable and testable phenomena.

One example is the theory that the universe we live in and observe started with the Big Bang, or the Big Inflation as scientist now insist. The Big Bang theory is based on observations of the current universe and stated in mathematical language and formula which are “run back” to the “beginning” of the universe until the math reaches the point where it is no longer useful or adequate as a tool of understanding. In other words, the math works out as far as it can go, but it cannot go farther than a certain point. Thus assumptions have to be made to explain what is left unexplained by the math, which otherwise works out for the observations we now have of the universe. This is to say the obvious: that there is no direct observation of the Big Bang, and there is no way to directly validate this theory. We are unable to change this theory from a theory to a certainty, an empirically incontestable fact. Yet the theory holds up under other mathematical and empirically testable facts. The preponderance of evidence strongly suggests at this time in our scientific observations and calculations that the universe began as a Big Bang.

It is well known that the theory of the Big Bang predicts that there will be left over stuff from that event. And how that left over stuff was accidentally discovered at Bell Laboratories is part of modern scientific folklore. That evidence for the left over stuff is made famous in the well known background radiation map of the universe, oval and colorful, which everyone has seen in various presentations on modern astronomy. As the preponderance of evidence shifts in the future another theory will arise to explain the origins of the universe.

Another example is the theory of evolution, initially put for by Darwin and his contemporary Alfred Wallace, to explain the variations in nature that he observed. That theory has been greatly refined over the course of years and is validated by genetic observations, which of course, were unavailable to Darwin. By following the track left behind by our genetic make up, we can trace our material, or physical origins back in time to a certain set of conditions or circumstances lost in pre-history. We cannot go back in time and make direct observations of these alterations, which happened at a glacial pace in comparison to our sense of time bounded by a set life span. So, we have to depend upon a theory about the origins of the genetic development of the human race. The preponderance of evidence points to the justification of the theory of evolution.

The Mimetic Theory of the “humanization” of our species put forth by Rene Girard is deceptive in its simplicity. The theory states that over an unimaginable and indeterminate period of time, thousands of years or maybe even millennia, higher primates became self conscious by means of their imitation of others in their social group. His theory is simply stated this way: We desire according to the desire of the other. This theory was explicitly and almost exactly stated in a recent film, although used in the film in a cynical manner and probably without conscious reference to the work of Girard. The film is entitled the Affair of the Necklace, based on a court case that served as the spark for the French revolution. One of the characters at the court of Louis the XIV is asked how he knows what to desire amidst all the intrigue and maneuverings of court life. To which he replies: I ascertain what I desire when I learn what everyone else desires.

Girard’s theory is as deceptively simple as is Einstein’s theory of relativity and, like Einstein’s theory, it is blossoming out with enormous implications for anthropology, sociology, psychology, political science, evolution, religion and philosophy. Furthermore it is validated, like any such theory must be, in texts of literature, both secular and sacred, a validation exhaustively documented in Girard’s major works. To make very complicated scholarly research accessible to our understanding without going into it in detail, we can say that what Girard has discovered is the “left over stuff” from the first incidences of our becoming human beings. What he has found in the literary texts of human history is similar to the cosmic background radiation left over from the Big Bang. His theory is also being validated in the recent neurological observations regarding “mirror neurons” in the brains of higher primates and humans. In other words, it can be demonstrated empirically that we humans are hardwired to imitate others.

The important point to notice is the “object” of what we desire is always and everywhere, a learned desirable object. We do not have desire in us, we acquire desire from outside ourselves, from an other-than-me. The second important point to note is that without desire we do not have a self, we don’t know who or what we are until we acquire desire. Our desire, and thus the self we think is so independent, is mediated by the other. It is always a three way proposition, a triangulation. We (the subject) learn what to desire (the object) through and by the object desired by the other (the medium). This gives us a sense of self, which we don’t and cannot have alone, that is inter-dependent on the social structure, the others of our social context. In order to be, we have to be taught what to be, a teaching we acquire from another.

Just as in the genetic theory of evolution, where there is no single point at which physical stuff, genes, changed enough to support consciousness identity, that is there is no “missing link” to be discovered; so too in the mimetic theory there is no single point at which “humanization” happens. In both cases, evolution and humanization, we can say that they happened repeated in numerous favorable circumstances over the course of thousands of years, even over millennia, but the origin of both are lost in the mists of pre-history and are undiscoverable. Thus all we can rely on is a “theory” supported by the preponderance of available evidence.

There is one more important point in Girard’s theory that cannot be overlooked, although it is the most disturbing and controversial element of his theory. Human conscious identity popped into existence, or rather popped into and out of and into etc. existence, at the point of the death of another. In other words, human identity, the sense of self, is defined by death. It is impossible to discover what these foundational events actually were, but we can see traces of them in the human mythological record across cultural barriers. The foundational episodes leave behind their patterns in the stories that human tell themselves in order to make sense of their world, much as the cosmic background radiation map is the left over patterns of the original Big Bang. Although we cannot actually see it, there is a (or many such) real event that gave birth to these patterns. And that event was death. We can imagine that it started with the death of the prey in a group hunt. The animal is killed in the usual manner, a pattern learned, improved on and repeated over millennia. But one time something unheard of happens. Instead of the group falling upon the carcass of the prey in the usual social hierarchical order, perhaps the alpha individual or perhaps the group as a whole, stand back waiting for what…? Instincts would urge them to fill their hunger. But this time, instinct is abated, perhaps only momentarily, in one or many or all of the hunters. Instinct is suspended not by external circumstances or conditions which most certainly would have happened many times over in the course of pre-history. Rather instinct is abated by something internal to the hunter or hunters. Over the course of time, this suspension of instinct is learned by others in the group, following Girard’s theory: desire is learned from the desire of the other. In our imaginary story this becomes the foundational event for conscious identity, the first halting steps toward humanization, through the process of imitation.

The imitation of the other cuts two ways and both ways are simultaneous. We learn from others in our social group what to desire leading to both cooperation and competition. At some point we have to confront the documented fact of not just same species, but same social group killing – in human terms, murder. It is now a well known fact that in higher primates more individuals die at the hands of other group members than die as prey. Girard explains these “murders” as competition for the desirable object. But the significance of this particular act of taking life begs to be clarified. One individual gets tagged as the source of the group’s dis-ease by standing in the way of a desirable object, in this case group peace and order. The more agitated the group becomes, the less efficient and cooperative it becomes in hunting and survival skills. How to resolve this conflict? Remove the source of the disorder. Why the murder of another group member? It follows the logic of Girard’s insight: we acquire desire according to the desire of the other. An individual is tagged as introducing chaos in place of group order by its behavior. Once the individual is removed something miraculous and magic happens. Order and peace return. The tension is released. A condition that holds for a time until the next group disturbance, and identified scapegoat, happens. Murder is then reenacted to restore order out of the chaos. The reason the foundational murder keeps getting reenacted all the way up to this present time is that it keeps working. Get rid of the cause of the problem and the problem disappears, at least temporarily. But it also gets passed on.

This is Girard’s most arresting insight into the origins of humanization. In addition to and posterior to the foundation event for conscious identity, namely death of an other, there is also a foundational murder that gives birth to the social order and, by extension, to our sense of self. The foundational murder that gives birth to humanity in consciousness is lost to our awareness, just as the actual origin of the universe is unavailable to our observation. We have forgotten that we are individuals because of a murder or murders, the sacrificing of another individual for the sake of releasing the tension of our existence which arises out of our competition for a learned desirable object. The foundational murder gets transmuted into hero stories and religious sacrifices to appease angry gods, all of which are strategies to forget the original or foundational murder, to forget the horror of it and the weight of this horror on human consciousness.

Life is not only suffering, unsatisfactory (dukka) as Buddha taught, life is unbearable to the point where we must remove the very thing that is bearing it, namely the fragile sense of self which pops into being along with learned desire. According to Buddhist teaching anatman is the solution to the tension of life. Instead of removing the other by means of scapegoating them, or instead of sleeping in the foggy forgetfulness of our origins, which most human do most of the time, we remove the self, no-self. No-self means no desire. No desire means no tension, nothing to fight over. It is a retreat into a pre-self consciousness. Please note this is not a pre-conscious state, a primitive condition of human awareness. It is a state of consciousness without a sense of self clinging to it. Consciousness without content, and the most fundamental content of consciousness is self. That is one religious strategy for dealing with the unbearable likeness of being.

There is another religious strategy for dealing with the horrors of the origins of the fragile sense of self, a strategy that does not implicate desire as totally in cahoots with our distressed condition. And this strategy is to change the medium from which we learn what is desirable and thus gain a sense of self. Instead of desiring according to the desire of any other, and thus gambling on our sense of self in that any “other” will do, we learn to desire according to the desire of a particular other. This is the Judaeo-Christian religious tradition. The Judaeo part is called the “law” and the Christian development out of that is called the Christ, the resurrected Jesus of Nazareth. The Christian traditions says that the law didn’t work. It doesn’t absolve our complicity in the foundational murder and the resulting horror in human consciousness. We remain bound up in that trauma, and all human strategies finally fail to extract us from our complicity with it. Rather what is needed is a new start that goes back further than the foundational murder all the way to the foundational event, the enthrallment with death itself. This new start couldn’t take place until the human species evolved enough to bear it, in the Christian terminology, “in the fullness of time.”

The resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth is the cornerstone of Christianity. Without it there is no Christianity, for the resurrection redefines the story of humanity. Instead of death defining what it means to be human, an unimagined and unexpected life uncoupled from death defines what it means to be human. The new model of what it is to be human is not just an “other”, or the “law”, neither of which addresses the fatal problem of death. The new model is the One who has undergone death, physically bears the marks of his death, showing that death is both real and a hollow threat to who and what we are. If one person can undergo death and overcome that fatal condition in rising from the dead, then that fact is of enormous significant to what it means to be human.

Equally important is the fact that the one who rises from the dead appears to other humans who knew him to be dead. Their reaction to this appearance is noteworthy. They might have been in shock, or grief, or guilt after the death of their friend and teacher. But the Christian record explicitly notes that they are terrified at the appearance of the risen Jesus. Their whole sense of self is threatened by the resurrection. The very debt or tax of being human is abolished. In Christian terminology not only sin is forgiven, but what we know, and have hidden from ourselves, to be the very origins of being human is forgiven. We have been wrong from the very beginning and that is no longer a problem. So we can look the big lie in the face, eye to eye, without fear of losing our footing. The resurrection shows that being human encompasses all of that, the foundational event, the foundational murder, the fragile sense of self received from others, and outpaces it all in orders of magnitude unheard of before. Instead of getting rid of the self, Christianity seeks the truth of the self. Or perhaps the truth in the self. That truth is uncovered in the fact of the resurrection.

There is one more part to this that cannot be seen intellectually or felt emotionally or otherwise brought down to what we sense as human finitude, much less written or spoken about. This story begs for a satisfying ending, a key to finally grasping the meaning of life, the reality of the resurrection, the model of being human. But how does one close on life uncoupled from death, where death is not denied and is made unnecessary? “Not denied and made unnecessary” just don’t go together in human consciousness. This requires something different. The self we think we know cannot grasp what the new self evoked in the resurrection is. Perhaps this very conundrum is only resolved in the imitation of the new Other, rather than in just any other. Going back to Girard’s theory that we learn desire from the desire of another, perhaps we can invoke a refreshed desire by changing the mediator, the model, the medium through which desire is learned. We don’t have to change the pattern or the conditions by which we have become human through evolution. The pattern holds true, in the sense of reliable. Instead of competition for the desirable object, the resurrected life, we simply, but not easily, become like the one who already has what we desire. By taking on his vantage point, we can see what is obvious to him, but hidden from us and only revealed to us in him.
This means that in order to get what we want we have to become the medium of what we desire, instead of acquiring the object of our desire through a medium or by sacrificing the medium. The purpose of human life is just that, to be the medium of what has been uncovered in the resurrection. But in attempting to write about it this already unravels and bleaches the tension out of our quest in a way that discourages us from the adventure it is meant to encourage.

Guest Posts

Previous Post

June 14, 2011

Is "Sexual Compatibility" a Myth? Some Thoughts on Cohabitation

Next Post

June 15, 2011 On being a Franciscan

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book prophesies the destruction of Nineveh?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Zephaniah Jonah Nahum Obadiah