Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
A Study Of “On The Character of Men And the Virtuous Life”: Part XII.

A Study Of “On The Character of Men And the Virtuous Life”: Part XII.

Last updated on: March 28, 2011 at 6:00 pm by Henry Karlson

A Study Of “On The Character of Men And the Virtuous Life”: Part XII. 2011-03-28T18:00:45-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Introduction and Part II

We find ourselves once again in a series of paragraphs with related theme, that of the nature and experience of good and evil. We are in familiar territory, but we find the text once again delving into the territory with some new insight. If we took the time to explore everything contained in the next few paragraphs, and discern what is being said in them, we would find out we are dealing with a spiritual genius. But, for our purpose here, we must only highlight what is said, so we can move on to a new theme which needs be examined. Nonetheless, if the author is truly Anthony or one of his disciples, we have even more reason to recognize the genius within, because the text gives answers to the question of evil which will be used and developed by some of the greatest thinkers of the Christian tradition.

The soul is said to be naturally pure and good, and, as long as it keeps its innate goodness, it keeps its attention on God, allowing it to be enlightened by God.[1] Union with God fills the soul with good desires. As long as a soul’s will is united with God’s will, it desires heavenly things, not earthly rewards such as fame – indeed, because it lives contrary to the way of the world, it is disliked or hated, perhaps even ridiculed, without such mockery affecting it because it only cares for what is good.[2] Evil seduces, making people love it and its ways due to false promises; what it promises, it does not give. It blinds people, turning them away from God, turning them away from the one who can truly enlighten them and make them wise, making them ignorant. “Those who are full of evil and drunk with ignorance do not know God, and their soul is not watchful.”[3] Darkened by ignorance, they are easily manipulated, with their thoughts distorted by the interference of demons.[4] The relationship between good and evil, happiness and misery, is best expressed in these lines:

When the soul has come to recognize evil it hates it like the stench of a foul beast; but he who does not recognize evil loves it, and it holds him captive, making a slave of its lover. Then the unfortunate and wretched man can neither see nor understand his true interest, but imagines this evil is an adornment, and so he is happy.[5]

One of the greatest puzzles for theology is the question of evil. By its nature, that is, by the fact that it is irrational, any explanation fails to explain evil, for that explanation seeks to use reason to explain what is fundamentally irrational. We can, however, perceive, in some fashion, how we react to evil and why we follow its ways, but we cannot explain how such a distortion fully entered the world. This does not mean we have nothing to say on the matter; what it means is that, what we say, we must understand is fundamentally flawed because it over-reaches, because it seeks to explain the unexplainable; but, even if our project is doomed to failure, it is useful because, by looking into the possible causes of evil, we can then humbly examine ourselves and those impulses which lie inside us which lead us to act and “create” more evil. Knowing them, we can work against them, that is, we can purify ourselves from them, so that they do not lead us astray. The point is not that these impulses are evil, but rather, they become the means by which evil perverts our understanding and distract us, by making our focus be on them, on a part of our being, rather than being true to the fullness of ourselves and our being. Evil distorts by breaking things apart, by destroying their holistic harmony, and then having such parts it finds rearranged so that undue emphasis is put on one aspect of our being, leading to an imbalanced activity which, as long as it is followed, will never lead us to perpetual happiness. Those who see the work of evil in their soul will see how evil is distorting their lives; they will see how they have acted and reacted according to the ignorance of distorted perceptions, and so they will seek to remove any distortions which interfere with their experience in the world, so they can then experience the world as it truly is. Only then can true happiness be had, and only then can one be open for union with God.

Since we have turned away from God, our experience of God and the world is covered up, and we see the world through the lens of sin. We ignorantly follow what we think will give us happiness. With a distorted perception of the world, our mind thinks and responds to the data given it, and it comes to wrong conclusions. We reason according to an incomplete picture, with an imperfect, fallen intellect, and so we act based a fallen mode of reasoning, an act which is accomplished through a fallen mode of willing (the gnomic will). We still seek happiness, we even will for what we think is good, but, because we have fallen and turned our back on the Good, the good we seek is a lesser good, and cannot satisfy us as the Good can.

When the people of a community come together and express their shared understanding of the world, this leads to what is known as “common sense.” We cannot stand by and accept what common sense teaches, because it is an aggregate of the ideas created through false perceptions. Though it can and often does contain elements of truth, nonetheless common sense is the expression of a fallen and ignorant understanding of the world and therefore cannot be the source of our understanding of what is good. Common sense often decries what is good, and insults those who do good, or, as St Augustine points out, it often leads to a condemnation of those who do good:

But haven’t people often been condemned for good deeds? Not to refer you to any other books, recall the story that is superior to all others by virtue of its divine authority. There you will find that we must think very poorly of the apostles and martyrs if we intend to make condemnation a sure sign of wrongdoing. All of them were judged worthy of condemnation because of their confession of faith It follows that if everything that is condemned is evil, it was evil in those days to believe in Christ and to confess that faith. [6]

Evil is difficult to recognize, because it appears as good. It seeks, not only to misdirect persons, but to create structures of sin, to create an environment in which the world is perceived through distorted mental constructs, and to reify them, to make people think they are absolute truth and what is good, so that people, following them, will create (if that is the right word) more evil. Of course, people are not seeking evil, rather, they follow some good which is taken as the whole of the good. The one who sees beyond such a construct must see such a good for what it is, for a good that it is but a good misapplied and abused, taken out of its proper holistic context. This is often difficult, and why so many who oppose evil end up creating a new evil, using another distorted good to respond to a different evil. This is also why so many have difficulty seeing beyond the evil they stand for, because for them, they do not see it as evil; they see the good before them, and think that proves what they support cannot be said to be evil, ignoring, of course, how evil uses such a good as a vehicle for its justification.

When we will, we will for our happiness, for what we think is right and good. Evil traps us, because it distorts our ability to understand what is good. It turns our attention to some lesser good, to some distortion of being, leading us to act inappropriately. It might not be immediately, but the fruit of our act will come out, and negatively affect us. When we look at our life as a whole which we have made, it points to a disposition we have created for ourselves. Have we come to understand why we are not to be like gods, that we cannot create good and evil, and so open ourselves up to the fullness of the real, or will we try to become the god of our own existence, to demand the mental construct we establish is the fullness of reality, creating our existential prison in which no eternal happiness can be found? Those who see the limitations of our mental constructs will see how they create the evil which we must avoid, and they will avoid such evil – they will open themselves up by overcoming the one ultimate construct which must be destroyed, the false egotistical self, so that they can become the open person who is free to experience the world as it truly is. They will act, not according to a deliberative will that seeks to reify their own mental constructs, but according to the open nature of the world, to the true nature of everything, so that the good in all things can be shared by all without distortion.

St Augustine, after establishing that the Good is God, and that God is the one alone who can bring us happiness, points out that it is because we turn away from God, from the common source of all that is good, that we sin. We sin because we seek, not the common Good of all, but the limited good for the self:

Therefore, when the will cleaves to the common and unchangeable good, it attains the great and foremost goods for human beings, even though the will itself is only an intermediate good. But when the will turns away from the unchangeable and common good towards its own private good, or toward external or inferior things, it sins. It turns toward its own private good when it wants to be under its own control; it turns toward external things when it is keen on things that belong to others or have nothing to do with itself; it turns toward inferior beings when it takes delight in physical pleasure. In this way one becomes proud, meddlesome, and lustful; one is caught up into a life that, by comparison with the higher life, is death.[7]

This is the point. When we turn in and thing with the false concept of the self, trying to make it a god which then creates a construction of the world, seeking to turn reality into a play thing under its control, it closes in on itself, seeking happiness in itself, and, inasmuch as there is any goodness within, that is as much happiness as it will find. But the only way for eternal happiness is to transcend that shell of the self and to know God, to be united with God, because he provides, not a limited good, but unlimited good. Anything else ends up as hell.

While much of this text is in accord with what has already been seen as Anthonite, we might wonder whether or not the exposition on evil here is something which Anthony himself would have provided. That is, would Anthony, before Augustine, have a semi-Augustinian understanding of the will for evil? The answer must be yes, because asceticism is based, in part, on the pursuit of the real good instead of the apparent good. Ascetics, Anthony being one of them, understand why they need to purify their wills, for they understand the attraction of evil and why people turn to it. The wisdom they offer comes, in part, from the way they have mapped out temptation, that is, they have seen what desires lie within and how they attract us to act in error.[8] It is for this reason one must watch over oneself; watchfulness is an important concept which, without surprise, is one Anthony understood.[9]

Christian ascetics also understand that the real happiness comes from God, who they seek after in their asceticism. We find Anthony explaining in Athanasius’ Life how God works good for those who choose the good, which of course, is why we must seek after God*:*

Wherefore, children, let us hold fast our discipline, and let us not be careless. For in it the Lord is our fellow-worker, as it is written, “to all that choose the good, God worketh with them for good.”[10]

While this is not the exact same thing as saying God is the source of all that is good, and so by finding God, we find the happiness we seek, it points out, in the practical sense, how God will provide that which people seek if one seeks after the good. This can only make sense if God is that good, but that is not something Anthony would see as needing to be explained in every place he is exhorting others to seek after the good. Theological answers are important, but monks need to find the theological answers within, so as to really know the truth and not rely upon the experience of others to know it. This means, it should not be surprising that Anthony at times would exhort his audience to know the truth in themselves, to find the implications of his arguments for themselves, so as to prove for themselves their real understanding of the truth and not some bookish knowledge of it. Even if we do not find him speaking anywhere else as directly as we see written here, it is the authentic conclusion to what we do see him speak about, and so it is not surprising if he would, in some place or another, have spoken or written what we see here. Thus, what we see here is not a stretch to attribute to Anthony, but, by itself, it is not something we can show as being a way he would express himself.

[1] “On the Character of Men and on the Virtuous Life,” 337 (#52).

[2] Ibid., 337 (#53).

[3] Ibid., 337(#54).

[4] Ibid., 337 (#52).

[5] Ibid., 336-7 (#51).

[6] St Augustine, On Free Choice of the Will, 5.

[7] Ibid., 68.

[8] We have already seen how Anthony recognized virtue as what is natural to the soul, while when it turns away from this natural good, when it turns in on itself, it begins to engage vice. This is a similar kind of position as what we find here, though of course, the difference is that our passage here explains why one would engage evil: not only do we think some evil action will provide us happiness, we achieve some level of pleasure or happiness from it, vindicating (it seems) our ignorance.

[9] “And let us strive that wrath rule us not nor lust overcome us, for it is written, ‘The wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God. And lust, when it hath conceived, beareth sin, and the sin when it is full grown bringeth forth death .’ Thus living, let us keep guard carefully, and as it is written, “keep our hearts with all watchfulness,”’

Athanasius, Life of Antony, 201.

“Having summoned those who were there–they were two in number who had remained in the mountain fifteen years, practising the discipline and attending on Antony on account of his age–he said to them, ‘I, as it is written, go the way of the fathers, for I perceive that I am called by the Lord, And do you be watchful and destroy not your long discipline, but as though now making a beginning, zealously preserve your determination. For ye know the treachery of the demons, how fierce they are, but how little power they have. Where fore fear them not, but rather ever breathe Christ, and trust Him. Live as though dying daily. Give heed to yourselves, and remember the admonition you have heard from me,” ibid., 220.

[10] Ibid., 201.

Previous Post

March 28, 2011

Quote of the day: Hans Urs von Balthasar

Next Post

March 28, 2011 What about Sirte?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Whose daughter did Jesus raise from the dead in Capernaum?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jairus' daughter Mary's daughter Joseph's daughter Nicodemus' daughter