Natural Family Planning Apples to Artificial Contraception Oranges

Last updated on: May 3, 2017 at 7:02 pm by Brett Salkeld

Natural Family Planning Apples to Artificial Contraception Oranges 2017-05-03T19:02:56-05:00 Brett Salkeld

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Longtime Vox Nova readers will be familiar with my habit of writing about Natural Family Planning from a supportive yet self-critical point of view. I seem to have found a kindred spirit. Over at Roma Locuta Est, Jake Tawney has recently published a post called The Effectiveness of Natural Family Planning. In it he dismantles the idea that NFP is 99% effective.

Now, before you get your dander up you need to know two things. First of all, Jake is supportive of Church teaching and is, in fact, a certified NFP teacher. Second, you need to have a look at his math. As far as I can tell, he is spot on when he argues that, in practice, NFP is something closer to 67% effective over the full course of a couple’s fertile time together.

This may look somewhat alarming at first glance, but it is important to note that Jake’s observations apply almost as well to artificial methods and that none of them approach the advertised 99% effectiveness either. (I have, in previous posts, suggested NFP is as effective as most other methods, but without resorting to numbers.) In fact, when I give talks to young people I often ask them to put up their hands if they know anyone who got pregnant while using a condom or the pill. Even among younger audiences, a significant number – I’d guess a large minority – of hands go up.

The fact is that both those who would sell you artificial contraceptives and those who would “sell” you NFP are happy with statistical models that give them effectiveness ratings well above what your own empirical experience is likely to indicate. And both can blame poorer than expected performance on “user failure.”

I don’t want to go into this too much more here. Jake does a nice job of it himself and I recommend you go check out his post as well as the comments following it, in which he gives more detail on his mathematical model in response to queries from his readers. His basic conclusion is that we should not use its supposed 99% effectiveness as a selling point, or at the very least not as the primary selling point, of NFP. Such a tactic is bound to backfire when people actually live in the 67% world. Rather, Jake says, we should do it because it is what we believe to be right.

I agree with Jake, but what I do want to do here is take the opportunity to highlight one other reason why I feel that comparing NFP to artificial contraception statistically is not particularly productive. I have noted before that NFP differs from artificial contraception because it consists in, basically, not doing something. Now, from a statistical point of view, it is tricky to compare the effects of not doing something with the effects of doing something.

Of course, NFP can be used to 100% effectiveness. One can totally abstain and one will not get pregnant. But the fact that it is not 100% effective means that the people using it actually do engage in “pregnancy-causing behavior” on occasion. This behavior is, for NFP users, different than for artificial contraception users. Let me try to explain.

AC users are either using AC or they are not. If you didn’t take your pill or didn’t use your condom, then you weren’t using your AC. User failure is very easy to identify. There is no equivalent here for NFP users. There is nothing to point to in order to say, “Oh, we didn’t use our NFP that night.” All that means is that we didn’t abstain (something which the AC users also didn’t do).

But if not abstaining is tantamount to user failure then NFP becomes, by definition, 100% effective! Every single pregnancy is the result of user failure.

No, in order for NFP to be usefully compared to AC in terms of effectiveness rates there must be an equivalent kind of method failure. If NFP is not to be 100% effective by definition there must be cases where people who are absolutely sure of their infertility make love and get pregnant. But is this actually possible? Can you be as certain of your infertility as of the fact that you took your pill consistently or that you are wearing a condom? I think not.

The thing about using NFP is that you are conscious of the fact that, even with the best information you can gather, you are never 100% sure about the state of your fertility. You can be fairly certain, and less certain, but you can’t be 100% sure. You yourself have to decide just how certain you need to be before deciding whether or not to make love. A couple that is in a drastic situation (e.g., if pregnancy threatens the life of the woman) may feel that they are almost never certain enough. But if individual couples have to decide how certain is certain enough for them, how can this be reflected in studies comparing effectiveness rates? I, for one, don’t think it can be.

This means at least two things. First of all, it means that much of the time NFP couples are in a kind of “yellow-light” phase in which they are uncertain about the status of their fertility, a phase that has no equivalent for AC couples. And without such an equivalent, statistical comparisons mean less than they seem to on the surface. Secondly, it means that typical NFP users, unlike typical AC users, are conscious that pregnancy-causing behavior always has the chance of causing pregnancy. Armed with such knowledge, NFP users are much better equipped to deal with method or user failure, no matter how common or rare, than those who have been tricked into believing that sex doesn’t make babies.

Brett Salkeld is a doctoral student in theology at Regis College in Toronto. He is a father of two (so far) and husband of one. He is the co-author of How Far Can We Go? A Catholic Guide to Sex and Dating.

Previous Post

March 7, 2011

A Study Of “On The Character of Men And the Virtuous Life”: Part VII

Next Post

March 8, 2011 Bracketing the Truth

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

My hair held my strength, but a woman's betrayal led to my capture and blindness. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Absalom Samson Gideon Saul