Thoughts Based Upon a Reading of a Speech by Badshah Khan.

Last updated on: January 11, 2011 at 4:26 pm by Henry Karlson

Thoughts Based Upon a Reading of a Speech by Badshah Khan. 2011-01-11T16:26:37-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In a different time, and a different place, a peace maker saw the rise of violence in his homeland. He understood the cause of the violence, and found that those in government, with their policies were collectively at fault. What he said, though based upon a particular situation, nonetheless has some universal value. How would you adapt these words to fit the violence which we have seen rising in various parts of the world?

I now take up the ticklish question of the riots in East Pakistan. It is extremely embarrassing to speak out one’s mind while dealing with this subject. I am a believer in non-violence and hold that violence never pays. It only serves to evoke hatred and makes the confusion more confounded. Nevertheless, I cannot help remarking that the said happenings in East Pakistan are the direct outcome of the policy you had been following in that part of the country for the last seven years. You gagged public opinion and imprisoned people without trial. You did not care to fill the vacant seats in the provincial legislature and proceeded with the governance of the province in an arbitrary manner without paying any heed to the aspirations of the people, whose goodwill you took for granted. The masses were ruthlessly persecuted and oppressed. Their needs were overlooked and they were subjected to extreme hardships and oppressions. The cumulative effect of all these factors was that a Muslim League could secure no more than a mere nine percent of the seats in a provincial election and the people of East Pakistan returned a decisive verdict of no-confidence in the Muslim League and its government. But then even this lesson seems to have fallen flat on you, and you are still pursuing the policies calculated to embitter the feelings of the people and creating conditions which are sure to engender mutual suspicion and bickering amongst the various classes. You suppress the legitimate aspirations of the people in general and play off one section against another, and when the matters come to a head, a scapegoat is readily seized and declared responsible for all the troubles. I am afraid the direction in which the events are now drifting in West Pakistan too, points to the results not much happier than what we have recently experienced in the eastern wing of the country…

Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, “After Riots in East Pakistan: Speech in Constituent Assembly. 8 April, 1954” in Words of Freedom: Ideas of a Nation. Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan (New Delhi: Penguin Books, 2010), 89-91.

In reading this speech, I can see partisans in the United States looking at how their opponents meet what Badshah Khan points as the problem in the Pakistan of his day. All sides of the political landscape can bring out examples of what their opponents have done to make things worse. Certainly this is true, but we must look more deeply to the changes happening in our society, and the desperation which we see forming in the American people. Fear and confusion rules the landscape, and it is easy to create enough fear, that even good plans and policies are dismissed by the people who need them. Those who have helped to create such fear, those who have helped make people feel like there is no value left to living, from whatever side of the political debate they find themselves in, have been helping to build the culture of death, a culture which is about far more than abortion. As long as the human person is not seen as dignified in their own right, no matter how bad the moral character of the person, the culture of death will be allowed to continue.

At the basis of our current culture is the depersonalization of the person, turning them into objects: they are turned to mere ciphers, objectified examples of virtues or vices we like or despise, while the person as a whole is rejected – the person is no longer seen as necessary or valuable, and so easily dismissed. It is easy to create automatons, it is more difficult to accept persons, persons with real imperfections, and to let them come to realize themselves in the midst of their imperfections instead of as an object to control, an object we see must suit some universal social norm. We treat people according to the dictates of economics, not the dictates of the heart.

As an example of what I mean, all we need to do is look at how some people in the United States feel about those who are jobless; about the homeless living on the streets: such people are described with all kinds of negative characterizations: they are lazy, worthless, not deserving social help. They are criminals who would rather steal than work. They have no concerns about morality and something must be done to stop them. Are there no prisons, no work camps? They are, in the end, no longer considered as people worthy of respect. They are no longer seen as humans striving to find themselves and improve themselves in situations which often are beyond their control. More often than not, they need not only help to live day to day, but also people to befriend them: without such friends, most of them end up lost and incapable of raising themselves out of the mire they have found themselves in (whether or not it was their fault for the situation). This, of course, is not new. All one has to do is look at the way vagabonds were seen in medieval Europe, and the kinds of stigma placed on them. Various medieval saints tried to help change that situation, some doing so more than others, but despite their efforts, in the end, social stigma more often won out and the impoverished were not understood. They were every bit the outcast as we outcastes in India; many were seen to be punished by their sins, and so deserved their horrible state in life.

We must remember that the poor are not tools which we need in order to prove how charitable we are. Those who look to charity in this fashion show they have no sense of charity: they don’t understand charity is to be an act of love. To them, it is an act of self- justification, where the poor are their tools for salvation. I cannot but feel that many people who contend that social justice must be accomplished merely by personal charity do so because they have no real heart for charity, rather, they look to keep the poor, poor, so they can feel good about the pittance they do for the sake of the poor. If they truly cared, they would seek to find the causes for poverty and change them. Social justice seeks out those structures, and aims to remove them, or put in new structures when necessary. There is no way society can live without structures, the question is, which structures. Those who have a heart for the people will care, and will seek such changes, even if it causes them to not be so well off in the end of their work. It doesn’t have to mean people will lose out on their social status, nor that everyone has to be equal: what it means is people have to respect each other, and work for the common good, so that no one is left without basic human needs. These needs are far more than food, shelter and clothing. These needs are spiritual, these needs are emotional, these needs are social needs, where someone is respected as a person who has something to offer others by their mere existence. This is why, even if the social structures are changed, and the basic material needs are met, there will not be an end to charity: rather, even if the material needs are met, emotional and spiritual needs will always be needs, and true charity seeks to give them as much as the material needs. Everyone needs to feel as if they have a place in the world, and accepted for who they are. As long as people see the poor as impersonal tools to make oneself righteous, true charity will never be understood. How can one deem themselves as caring for their neighbor if they ridicule them for being “welfare moms?” How can one be pro-life and ridicule those who have kept their children. Despising them and demeaning them demonstrates that the human person is not valuable; are you surprised they end up believing it and take the life of a person? But whose fault is it, since you have, in many respects, taken their life away first?

This gets back to our national situation. The poor are desperate, but their desperation tends to be limited and their actions limited in dealing with it. But their crimes cause more desperation. Desperation leads to more desperation, like violence leads to more violence. The cycle of desperation is all before us. Rhetoric, from all sides of the culture of death, has helped inspire desperation and acts of violence. All who add to the rhetoric are guilty. Politicians speak words because they want to influence people by them; do not let them convince you that their words have no impact. Even if their desire is to have people act one way with their rhetoric, this is not to say they are not responsible for other actions which can follow through with that same rhetoric, either directly, or indirectly. Violent rhetoric, like desperation, corrupts many in its path, until at last, somewhere down the chain of succession, someone, someone who has been made desperate, hears the words and responds. Those who are in control, those who have been in charge of society, are, collectively, to blame. We must, like Badshah Khan, keep speaking out against violence, but we must, like him do more than that; we must accept the collective, cultural responsibility, and have, as a society, a change of heart before it is too late.

Just because we were raised to believe some things were good because they are what our founding fathers thought were good does not mean they are; we cannot just go masking our own violence, our own desires for manipulation and control and justify it on the founding fathers. We are alive now; it is our duty to fix the social climate, even if it means repudiating the mistakes of the past. The law should be for man, not man for the law. The time is now. Let us receive the violence which have come before us as a sign of where our society is heading. We must change before it is too late.

America

Catholic Social Teaching

Previous Post

January 11, 2011

The Hunger Games Trilogy

Next Post

January 12, 2011 The anger is the argument

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Solomon Moses Paul