Fake Catholics

Last updated on: April 26, 2017 at 11:23 am by Morning's Minion

Fake Catholics 2017-04-26T11:23:35-05:00 Morning's Minion

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

They are at it again. Instead of striving toward Catholic unity, a small but determined minority of Catholics on the American right veer toward Protestant dichotomies. Real Catholics vs. fake Catholics. Orthodox vs. heterodox. Faithful vs. dissidents. But when you delve deeper, you will find the real concern is less with core aspects of faith and morals, and more with differences in political beliefs. You will find a high tolerance for “dissent” on certain issues, but not on others.

Let me provide two examples. One of the most obnoxious is Thomas Peters. In quiet aggressive terms, he castigates people he regards as “fake Catholics”. In his parlance, “fake Catholics” can be characterized by their penchant for deceiving Catholics, taking money from George Soros (the Koch brothers are OK, I suppose?), caring about “liberal pet projects”, and frequenting “Democrat” [sic] conventions. In other words, young Peters doesn’t like their politics, so he challenges their Catholicism. Anne Hendershott of Inside Catholic is not much better. Again, the focus is on “fake Catholic” groups. And again, instead of an argument of why these groups are not sincere Catholics, we get vapid political slogans – they conspired to elect “the most pro-abortion president we have ever had”. What irks her in particular is that these Catholic groups do not see eye to eye with her on what it means to be “pro-life”.

Where’s the consistency, people? What of those Catholics who ignore core moral teachings in other areas? How about George Weigel, who still defends the wicked war in Iraq, even after hundreds of thousands have been killed or displaced? How about Michael Novak, who thinks Catholic social teaching is centered around a preferential option for the rich and what Pope Pius XI called the “evil individualistic spirit”? How about Robbie George, who thinks that the faith is underpinned by the principles of the liberal Enlightenment as interpreted by America’s founders, and who regularly pays court to Glenn Beck, a man who distorts traditional teaching on social justice and collective salvation? How about Raymond Arroyo on EWTN who invites and supports pro-torture guests, even when they distort just war teaching? How about Newt Gingrich, who not only drinks from the “poisoned spring” of individualism, but adopts an antagonistic approach to Islam (even comparing Muslims to Nazis) that is far from Church teaching? How about Thomas Peters himself, who claims that there is no right to universal healthcare, that social safety nets should weakened, and that efforts to curb global warming should be opposed vigorously? Indeed, how about all those “Catholic” groups who use the unborn to hide their real opposition to healthcare reform – a wicked individualist mentality that forsakes solidarity in favor of illusive “freedom”?

Let’s talk about this. There are at least two levels here – the underlying moral principles that must guide action, and the concrete application of these moral principles to messy and uncertain facts and circumstances. In a word, prudential judgments. As moralist Richard Gaillardetz puts it:

“..particulars, unlike the principles themselves, are fluid and changing, and one’s grasp of them is necessarily more tentative than one’s knowledge of a principle. This means that one’s certitude about the rightness or wrongness of one’s judgments diminishes the more the judgments depend on contingent empirical data. And to the degree that contingency limits our certitude, there should be a greater willingness to tolerate disagreement.”

Except that these people will often elevate their own particular prudential judgment – no matter how flawed – to the level of principle, while simultaneously giving themselves a “prudential judgment” free pass on other areas.

Let’s apply this to healthcare reform, which ended up in a very complicated piece of legislation. The principles, laid down firmly by Catholic social teaching, were that the right to life was paramount and that everybody has the right to healthcare, regardless of income or status. People applied these principles to the underlying legislation and came up with different conclusions. I happen to believe that the USCCB ultimately made the wrong call, being overly influenced by their allies in the National Right to Life movement. I believe that this messy legislative compromise was wholly worthwhile as a way to provide healthcare to millions of excluded people and prevent insurance companies from dropping or refusing coverage. At the same time, it was far more pro-life than many thought possible – prohibiting the use of federal funds to purchase plans with abortion, insisting on a strict accounting separation even for those not receiving subsidies, and making sure that every state exchange had at least one pro-life option. Indeed, the barriers were higher than even the USCCB itself had insisted on in the past – for example, the bishops supported the federal subsidization of COBRA extension in the stimulus bill, with no pro-life protections whatsoever. Others feel differently. I think they are wrong, and I think they are applying inconsistent standards, but their reasoning is still guided by noble principles.

But not always. There is a dark side to this. As I’ve noted many times – and this was a real eye-opener for me – the lay Catholic opponents of healthcare reform were not merely focused on abortion, or even primarily focused on abortion. They mixed moral issues with arguments from American liberalism in ways that were often impossible to distinguish. For too many, abortion was a smokescreen to gloss over the real objection, an objection with no real grounding in Catholic teaching. They particularly opposed the individual mandate, based on an ideology that Pius XI would deem the “poisoned spring” of the “evil individualistic spirit” – a spirit that saw health as personal responsibility and opposed all notions that the fortunate must be compelled to subsidize the unfortunate. In its blatant rejection of solidarity, it resembles Calvinism more than Catholicism.

I believe this is an unacceptable rejection of a core moral principle, rather than a practical prudential judgment. Of course, the likes of Peters would not see it that way. As noted before, Peters makes the following, extremely sophisticated (!) argument: “I believe, prudentially speaking, that this bill will result in worse care for more people. This is a prudential conclusion that, as you would, say, I am entitled to.” Of course, Peters offers no evidence of this, beyond his entitlement to believe it. As the saying goes, he is entitled to his opinions, but not his facts. What is Peters doing here? He is basically rejecting the idea of a collective right to healthcare, and pretending this is an empirically-driven conclusion. In other words, he rejects the principle, and pretends it is a prudential judgment he is entitled to make. It’s bait and switch. And it has nothing to do with abortion.

We see this elsewhere. Many who claim to uphold the just war teaching stretched it so far to defend what happened in Iraq that one really question their accpetance of the underlying principles at all. Just looking at the circumstances and “contingent empirical data”, it seems far more likely that the Iraq war was unjust than that the healthcare reform law led to an increase in abortion. And yet the self-appointed guardians of orthodoxy do not seem very active in sniffing out fake Catholics in this corner.

At the end of the way, I’ll stick with Catholic unity. Even if I believe these people are fundamentally misguided on fundamental principles, it is not for me to issue pissy personal decrees of excommunication. There is room in the Church for George Weigel and Michael Novak, and for Thomas Peters and Anne Hendershott. Living with a messy and argumentative family is part of what being Catholic is all about. If only they could feel the same way.

Catholic Social Teaching

Health Care

Healthcare

Morning's Minion

Previous Post

September 16, 2010

Pulling the pants over our eyes (or wool)

Next Post

September 18, 2010 The Cross

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Revelation, what are the names of the two cities that the two witnesses' bodies lie in?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Babylon and Jerusalem Sodom and Egypt (figuratively called) Damascus and Tyre Rome and Athens