Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

voxnova

A Prolegomena to Prayer. Part IV-1.

Last updated on: June 9, 2010 at 4:00 am   by Henry Karlson

A Prolegomena to Prayer. Part IV-1. 2010-06-09T04:00:05-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Part III

Petitionary prayer, which is the kind of prayer most people are accustomed to, is perhaps the one which raises the most questions. The first, which we have mentioned a few times already, is the one which asks why God doesn’t just act, that is, why does God wait for our prayer to act? Others ask, why should I have to repeat a prayer, that is, why do I have to keep praying for the same thing before I get a response from God? Similarly, many ask, why don’t I always get what I pray for, since I see nothing wrong with what I ask and it would benefit me if I got it? And finally, like C.S. Lewis, we must wonder at the role of faith in relation to our prayer. On the one hand, we are told to pray for God’s will be done, and to ask for God to do something if it is within his will, on the other hand, we are told if we don’t believe God will give what we ask, our lack of faith itself might result in God not providing what we pray for — how exactly are we to reconcile the two? How are we believe we will get what we ask for, if we know it will only be done if God wills it, and if God wills it, then, once again, we return to the question, why exactly do we have to ask for it?

To begin, we must remember what has already been said about prayer. It is a dialogue with God, granted to us by his love. Prayer must always be seen within the sphere of God’s love for us, and our loving response back to God. Our love is capable of being of different kinds, and so it is capable of bringing different kinds of responses to God. Petitions are one such kind of response we can bring to God, and indeed, it is one of the first kinds we give to God. It is even used by people who normally do not pray when they find themselves in a time of great need and desperation.[1]This shows how rooted it is in us, that when we find ourselves in a fix, we immediately feel the need to cry out to God for help.

It is because God loves us that he has given us free will, but it is also because God loves us that he does not require us to act entirely on our own. We can, and do, need help from others — especially God. He gives us the possibility to interact with him, to ask for that help, and with it, we find his grace not only perfects nature, but allows us to transcend it, to do more than what we could have done if we did things entirely on our own. But his love for humanity and our freedom creates a self-imposed limit upon him; he does not want to force us to act, to turn us into puppets. He wants us to act freely, and to choose for ourselves how we will act and what it is we should like to accomplish. In this way, we see how God treats us as a loving father treats their children. Jesus’ revelation of God as father gives to us a way to understand his generous nature as well as why he does not do everything for us. He wants the best for us, but he knows that for our best to be achieved, we need some room to do things ourselves, even to make mistakes, and then to be there when we fall and help lift us up so we can do better in the future.

Our prayers should be seen under the light of our filial relationship with God. This is so beautifully expressed by Jesus in the prayer he gave to us to use: “Pray then like this: Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name” (Matt. 6:9 RSV). It is not that we should just call God father, but Jesus reveals to us how God sees us as his children, and he will respond to us like a loving father:

And I tell you, Ask, and it will be given you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For every one who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened. What father among you, if his son asks for a fish, will instead of a fish give him a serpent; or if he asks for an egg, will give him a scorpion? If you then, who are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will the heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him! (Lk 11: 9-13 RSV)

To understand what is being revealed by Jesus, we should consider the way a loving parent will take care of their children. As infants, parents give to them their every need. As infants grow, their parents will begin to ease off in what they give to their children, and will let them act and do things for themselves. Children begin to move about as they wish, with a freedom to explore the world, to learn about it, and to creatively interact with it, all under the gaze of their parents, who watch out and make sure their inquisitive natures does not lead them into any grave dangers. Nonetheless, they still cannot do all things on their own. Their parents continue to give them the food, shelter, love, and attention they need.

While it would be possible for a parent to tie up a child, and give everything they think the child should need without giving the child freedom, the child would come to realize their lack of freedom and suffer as a consequence to it. It is for this reason a parent will back away and give the child room to grow, to mature, to develop their own likes and interests. The child will begin to ask for what they would like, and not just take what is given to them. They will reveal themselves and their character. If what they want is good, their parents will help them achieve their goals. If what they want isn’t so good, their parents will try to encourage some other interest, sometimes by suggesting something else, sometimes by entirely forbidding the child from getting what they want.[2] A good parent will take into consideration their children’s desires, and give to them what they think the child is ready for, especially if it would benefit them, or at least, if they see no harm in giving it and they are able to give it. But children need guidance — a child should not be doing only what they wish, when they wish, and how they wish. If a child wants to eat twenty chocolate cakes in a given day, a good parent will deny it to them, even if the child asks for it. A good parent might give a piece of cake one day, when asked, and might give a piece of cake another day, even if the child does not ask, but he or she is unlikely to keep giving pieces of cake just because their child should ask for it. A parent wants what is good for their children, but also wants their children to develop themselves, their own interests, their own way of being. They want their children to enjoy their life, so we must think of this development as not just one for “mechanical necessity,” but of establishing a real sense of value and meaning to life and how that is achieved. Thus, while many things might appear to be useless on a purely pragmatic sense, such as the arts, they are extraordinarily needed for one’s spirit to feel fulfilled, and so many such things should be among the gifts parents give to their children.

Parenting, therefore, requires a parent to make a space for their child to develop, to find themselves, while nonetheless not abandoning the child, not making the child do all things for themselves without help. The young child will first learn about the world through the opportunities their parents open up to them. They will come to understand what their parents believe to be good. They will learn how to ask for those things from their parents, and they will come to understand when it is more likely than not that they will receive them. Initially they might ask for things at the wrong time, such as asking for a piece of cake right before supper, or they might ask for something they have no ability to use, such as a motorcycle at the age of six, and at those times, they will be denied what they ask for, not because they will always be denied them, but that they will be denied them so long as those things are being asked for at inappropriate times. Later, possibly through repetition, they might finally get what they ask for, but if they stopped asking, if they stopped showing an interest in something they once desired, their parents may or may not give it to them later. After all, one might be interested in motorbikes at six, and by ten be entirely bored by them. Indeed, if a parent offers it later, the child might even refuse it, which is why a parent does not always give to their child what their child had asked for when they believe their child is ready for it. On the other hand, they might still try, if nothing else, to show their love.

A good parent will learn when to offer something to their children, and how to offer it, especially as they get to know their child and their child’s interests. A parent and child will learn these together — and so a child might, at one time, think it wants something, ask for it, and find out they do not like it. A parent will give them such objects ( to the best of their ability to provide for them), and let the child determine if it is what they want or not; thus a parent will provide many opportunities to their children, to let their children explore and find out for themselves what exactly motivates them and their lives for themselves. They will seek to give a wide variety of gifts, some their children asked for, some which they did not but they think their children would like if exposed to it, and then back off and let their children to develop their own particular interests and to explore the gifts given to them as they should like.

Not everything will always go smoothly. There are times a parent will require a child to learn or do something for their own good, whether or not the child wants to, but the child will then learn through interaction with their parent the necessity of such activities (even if it means the child will first pout and cry and shout and complain when being told to do something they do not want to do). In such socialization, the parent will try to install ideals in their children, hoping such ideals will help shape their children’s development so that, when they are mature, they will have gained from them even if they did not appreciate the learning experience itself. Thus we see the interaction between two types of free will, with the parents determining, in part, the space in which their children develop, and yet within that realm of interplay, the children are free to come into their own, to become unique persons with unique interests and personalities. Children will ask of their parents for things, sometimes get it, sometimes not; they will also sometimes be required to do things they do not want to do, and complain when asked to do it, but find out that their complaints and not heeded. The fact that their parents do not heed complaints in one given instance does not diminish their trust in their parents, and so they will continue to relate to their parents, in a loving, filial relationship, asking their parents for their own desires to be met, revealing to their parents (and, often, to themselves) what those desires actually are. If they were not required to ask, and just had everything given to them before they asked, they would not develop a proper understanding, not only of their parents, but of themselves.[3] Parenting is a difficult task, and parents are not, of course, perfect at doing it. Yet, it is important for them to find the proper harmony between discipline and freedom, between giving and not giving, for any fault in the harmony will hinder the proper development of their children.

Footnotes

[1] Hence the expression, “there are no atheists in a foxhole.”

[2] While it can necessary, it must be remembered, many parents have found out that when they forbid something to their children, it often reinforces their children’s desire for what is forbidden. They must strive to explain why it is forbidden and to help encourage something else if they do not want their children to turn against their wishes, especially if the parent is really looking after the welfare of their children.

[3] Not only does one appreciate more what one has to struggle to get, one finds out more about oneself when one sees the things one is willing to struggle for and those things for which one is not willing to struggle. Thus, parents also find out about their children and their desires; is what the child ask just a whimsy they have which will quickly go away (as is often the case), or are they truly asking for something which they will use once they get it? Of course, some things are worth getting as quick gifts, whether or not they hold their value, but some things — some of the most important things — are best not to be given out so quickly.

Henry Karlson

Love

Prayer

Spirituality

Previous Post



June 8, 2010

More Violent "Pro-Lifers"

Next Post



June 9, 2010 Nauseating 'News'


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Persian king allowed Ezra to take Jewish exiles and gifts to Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Artaxerxes Nebuchadnezzar Darius Cyrus

Related posts from Vox Nova

Catholic

If Christ is our only King

Vox Nova

Catholic

Seeking Silence: My Life in Maundy Thursdays

Vox Nova

Catholic

An old millennial, unlearning entitlement

Vox Nova

Catholic

The Self-Protective Impulse Rears its Ugly Head Again

Vox Nova

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube