Looking Back with Bart Stupak

Last updated on: April 26, 2017 at 11:33 am by Morning's Minion

Looking Back with Bart Stupak 2017-04-26T11:33:38-05:00 Morning's Minion

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Via Grant Gallicho, Bart Stupak looks back at his role in healthcare reform. In my book, Stupak is a hero – his dual commitment to the unborn and to universal healthcare was unwavering, and he fought an extremely tough fight to secure an expansive healthcare reform that kept its distance from abortion. It is because of him and his band of pro-life Democrats that we got healthcare reform, and we got reform that is more pro-life than anybody could have possibly imagined.

And yet, today he sounds like a broken man. On the left, he was derided for merely interjecting abortion into the debate. On the right, he was attacked as a traitor, a Judas, who had the gall of actually believing in healthcare reform. And in the current poisoned atmosphere on the right, Stupak now faces a constant flood of hate mail, harassment, and death threats.

Through all of this, I am most disappointed by the role of the USCCB. In line with the Church, Stupak and his pro-life Democrats supported universal healthcare and opposed abortion – just like the USCCB. But in today’s society, there are far too few people in this camp, even among Catholics. And the USCCB ended up pulling the rug from under its erst-while ally, because he crossed a line in the sand drawn by those who opposed healthcare reform in any event. Here is his take:

“We also put in a final call to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which had been among my strongest supporters during the fall. I was disappointed by what I heard. No, no, no, no, they said. We need statutory law. But an executive order can have the full force of law, I said. Lincoln used one to free the slaves. George W. Bush used one to block stem-cell research using human embryos. And President Obama assures me that this is “ironclad.” Besides, I said, it’s time to negotiate or lose our chance to shape the bill. Help me with it? No, they said. Won’t you at least look at it? No.

That call changed my relationship with the pro-life movement. In the 18 years I’ve been in Congress, pro-life Democrats like me have delivered, working out compromises that protect human life. Now we had the most important piece of legislation for our movement yet—with pregnancy prevention, prenatal and postnatal care, and care for kids—and we couldn’t get support.”

What went wrong? A number of issues.

First, the USCCB elevated a prudential judgement – on how the final bill would affect abortion – to a point of principle.

The USCCB read it one way, others (including Prof. Timothy Jost and, importantly, Sr. Carol Keehan) came to another conclusion. Many times, I argued in favor of the latter:

The legislation banned federal funds from covering abortions, using tried-and-tested accounting techniques – funds must be strictly segregated and audited by state insurance commissioners using GAP, OMB, and GAO accounting standards.
The real difference came down to either a supplemental policy (Stupak) or a supplemental premium in the same policy (the legislation) covering abortion, with an identical fungibility issue;
States can prohibit all plans that offer abortion from accessing the exchange – a more radical idea than even Stupak had suggested, as it would even ban coverage for people who do not receive subsidies;
The forced separate premium for all plans that cover abortion will discourage people from taking these plans, and companies from offering them;
There must be at least one plan in every exchange that does not offer abortion;
The community health centers have never offered abortion and will not be able to offer abortion, as the newly appropriated funds will not be segregated from existing funds under the auspices of the Hyde amendment;
These protections are cemented by executive order;
There is a clear connection between abortion (which is highly related to poverty) and access to healthcare – after all, what is a pregnant uninsured woman to do when childbirth costs $25,000 and up, while an abortion costs a mere $400? Indeed, there seems to be a strong link between universal healthcare and lower abortion – even after the Romney experiment in Massachusetts which is eerily similar to the current reform.

When you look at the facts, it seems pretty clear that this was a pretty decent bill on pro-life grounds, and that the protections are light-years ahead of what is available to those with employer-sponsored insurance (and where the abortion coverage is fully subsidized through the tax system). But, even with the seal of an executive order, the USCCB refused to budge.

Remember, this is a prudential issue, one based on the application of principle to fact and circumstance. The debate quickly became rather technical and complicated, related to the reading of obscure legislative language. It may well be that they are right, and I am wrong. But I firmly believe the balance of evidence is on my side.

That said, I’m not necessarily saying the USCCB should have supported this bill. They could have laid out the principles clearly and left prudence to the faithful. After all, that is what they did with the Iraq war, when the prudential case for it being just was far less certain. To put in differently, the facts and circumstances indicated that the probability of a just war was far smaller than the probability of the current healthcare reform leading to a surge in tax-payer funded abortion.

Second, the USCCB failed to distinguish valid and invalid reasons for opposing healthcare reform.

The bishops stated their principles clearly – affordable universal healthcare, no funding for abortion, no discrimination against immigrants. And yet, the Catholic opponents of healthcare readily mixed moral issues with arguments from American liberalism in ways that were often impossible to distinguish. Just peruse these sites, and you will find the abortion argument intermingled with attacks on“socialized medicine” and “government-run healthcare”, as well as hyperbola about rationing and death panels. Pro-life arguments were always suffused by other, darker, arguments – arguments stemming from a tradition alien to Catholic social teaching, from an Enlightenment -era liberalism that glorifies the supremacy of individual freedom and pours cold water over notions of solidarity.

These people were never on the same page as Stupak, as he quickly realized. They never wanted this healthcare reform to pass. They were using him, and the unborn too. It is for this reason that they turned on Stupak, and in such a nasty and vicious manner. The bishops could have taken a stronger position here. They could have put more stress on the Catholic insistence that healthcare is a right, and the government might have a valid role in this provision. They could have corrected the misinterpretation of Catholic teaching on solidarity and subsidiarity doing the rounds.

On a related point – the bishops also did not do enough to damp down the flames that engulfed the whole healthcare debate. Is it any surprise that Stupak is receiving death threats when the Palinesque tea-partiers first began combining hateful and incendiary rhetoric with lies and misinformation almost a year ago? The bishops knew as well as everyone else that the ideas behind this healthcare bill came from the right – from Romney in Massachusetts to the Republican opponents of the Clinton healthcare reform in 1994. The ideas were relatively conservative (and I use that term in its correct sense). They could have been out in front in calling for a more civil debate.

To sum up – the first mistake was to raise prudence to principle, and the second was insufficient clarity on principle.

Not exactly a recipe for success. Still, I impute no bad motives to them, and my disappointment goes along with continued respect. Like Nicholas Cafardi, I fear they were more inclined to follow rather than lead on this issue,a dn to follow the most dubious participants in the debate. For following the disingenuous National Right to Life Commitee (NRLC)- which has in the past supported government funding for private abortion plans that cover abortion – is a recipe for disaster. And the result? Bitterness among the pro-life Democrats and all who desire a consistent ethic of life. Association of the pro-life cause with an angry, bitter, and increasingly violent, fringe. A setback in the ability to persuade those open to persuasion on the abortion issue.

Of course, a “pro-life Democrat” is anathema to the NRLC and is political machinations, so they and their supposedly “pro-life” allies will no doubt appreciate this outcome (and are already exploiting it). But for the Church, for the commonweal in general, and for the unborn in particular, it’s bad news. We need more Bart Stupaks, not less.

Previous Post

May 16, 2010

So, It's An "Obscure" Part of the Law?

Next Post

May 18, 2010 Quote of the Week: Gerald O'Collins, S.J.

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Joseph's brothers sold him to traders for thirty pieces of silver.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE