Don’t Limit Yourself To The Catechism Alone

Last updated on: February 27, 2010 at 4:57 am by Henry Karlson

Don’t Limit Yourself To The Catechism Alone 2010-02-27T04:57:32-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When the Catechism of the Catholic Church was published, I remember Mother Angelica telling her audience to pick up copies of it and to use it to inform themselves of the truths of the Catholic faith. While it was right to suggest people should read it, there was coming from her the implication that we were not being told the truth by our bishops and we need this book to tell us all that we have yet to learn. She gave to many a mistrust of the teaching ability of the bishops (and this was not based upon their failings as pastors to deal with scandals like clergy sex abuse, which, though a grave scandal, has nothing to do with their doctrinal authority). Probably the most famous example of her treatment of bishops was with her criticism of Archbishop Roger Mahony. The problem was she entirely misrepresented what he had wrote and claimed, contrary to what was said in it, that he denied the real presence.[1]

What Mother Angelica was suggesting is that if we got the catechism, we would know enough about our faith that we would be able to judge the theological opinions of fellow Catholics, to judge the work of theologians, and even to know when bishops are in error. But her own example of her debate with Archbishop Mahony shows how easy it is for one following such an attitude to be wrong. It is one thing to know the basics of the faith, it is another to engage sophisticated theological arguments. The problem is, people are being told to criticize such arguments without the needed theological acumen to do so, and so, as happens with such situations, people often naively use a heretical misunderstanding of the faith to judge authentic descriptions of the faith — they are not formal heretics, they are just mistaken. But, as history shows (the Protestant Reformation), it is easy for one to go from this level of argumentation into formal heresy, and it is for this reason such work is to be taken very seriously, with humility, and with a willingness to properly understand the position of the other instead of assuming one’s understanding of it.

What I have seen in many circles is a fundamentalistic understanding of the catechism. It is for this reason many people now go looking in the catechism for their faith, and if something is not written in the catechism in any explicit sense, they think there is a freedom to make up what one wants to believe. Perhaps one of the ways this is shown is in the debates about torture: if the catechism doesn’t call waterboarding torture, then we are free to make our own decisions.

This way of using and understanding the catechism, however, is contrary to what the catechism itself says about its purpose and intent. It was never meant to be an exhaustive declaration of everything one can find in the faith. It was not meant to limit theological conversation and to stop theological development based upon the truths we do possess. Take the following text from the catechism, which has is now being quoted again and again by torture supporters as proof waterboarding is fine:

Kidnapping and hostage taking bring on a reign of terror; by means of threats they subject their victims to intolerable pressures. They are morally wrong. Terrorism threatens, wounds, and kills indiscriminately; it is gravely against justice and charity. Torture which uses physical or moral violence to extract confessions, punish the guilty, frighten opponents, or satisfy hatred is contrary to respect for the person and for human dignity. Except when performed for strictly therapeutic medical reasons, directly intended amputations, mutilations, and sterilizations performed on innocent persons are against the moral law (CCC 2297)

We are expected to be able to read that text, not by looking only at the words used, but to use our reason to develop what is said in it and to see its applicability in real world situations. Those who say they don’t see waterboarding mentioned here remind me of others who say the word “Trinity” is not in the Bible. While waterboarding of prisoners to get information out of them is not mentioned as a specific, what is done is mentioned in this general description — the use of physical violence to extract a confession. If one is unable to use reason to guide their interpretation of this text to see how waterboarding follows the general type being offered in the catechism, then it is difficult to debate and argue with them. And if one had any doubt that their argument is irrational, remember, an argument from silence is a fallacy.

But there is something else also going on. The American individualistic spirit which thinks we can do all things ourselves seems to underlie this argument. But the catechism was not meant to be taken in this fashion. It was always meant to be taken and interpreted in the light of the fullness of Christian doctrine, a fullness which transcends the catechism itself (as can be seen from the fact that the catechism consistently references documents outside of itself to show the sources of its teaching). More importantly, this interpretation is most properly to be done by the bishops, as the catechism was primarily written for them in order to help them guide and teach their flock with a sure outline of the faith. They were expected to flesh out its contents and to create particular catechisms to meet the needs the laity. Thus, we read, “This catechism is given to them that it may be a sure and authentic reference text for teaching catholic doctrine and particularly for preparing local catechisms.”[2] This point is reiterated: “This catechism is not intended to replace the local catechisms duly approved by the ecclesiastical authorities, the diocesan Bishops and the Episcopal Conferences, especially if they have been approved by the Apostolic See. It is meant to encourage and assist in the writing of new local catechisms, which take into account various situations and cultures, while carefully preserving the unity of faith and fidelity to catholic doctrine.”[3]

The quotes above should point out that as a good representation of the faith, the catechism is not meant to be an exhaustive. It was not meant to silence the truth if it is not presented in the catechism. Those who try to take the catechism as their sole reference for the faith, and to limit their faith to what is said in it, have failed to have any real faith. And when they take such silence to allow them to engage immorality, they have become legalists looking for loopholes, not people of faith who understand the faith transcends the words which we use to declare it. And if they keep up in such behavior, they put their very soul at risk.

Footnotes

[1] There are legitimate criticisms one could have had with the Archbishop, but there is no need to make false accusations — there are reasons why she had to give an apology. I myself felt more should have been done, because of her accusation of heresy was false, and she told people to give zero obedience to a Prince of the Church (which suggest she had a poor understanding of ecclesiology and authority).

[2] Pope John Paul II, Apostolic Constitution Fidei Depositum

[3] ibid.

Previous Post

February 26, 2010

Ethical Experts Love Torture

Next Post

February 27, 2010 A Mother's Song

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Ephrathah" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fruitful Holy Place Chosen Land The Lord’s House